On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:48:11AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > That means that jonas's fear of breaking self-built kernels is vastly
> > unfunded, and that he should remove those hacks, include a mention of
> > the broken kernels in the README file, and maybe propos
Hi,
I've run a test build of 2.6.16-rc6, using dists/trunk/linux-2.6. It
appears that each flavor gets built twice, which is a huge waste of
resources. First build is peformed during 'make-kpkg build', second one -
during 'make-kpkg kernel-image'. Anybody else seeing this? I'm not sure
whethe
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 13:56 -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:38:58AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> >
> > hey Ryan,
> > Your best bet is to continue to push for upstream acceptance:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
>
> What about the f
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.15+2.6.16-rc5-0experimental.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source since some configure values
weren't defined.
| Automatic build of linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc5-0experimental.1 on meitner by
sbuild/hppa 79
| Build started at 200
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:19 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, dann frazier wrote:
>
> > sorry; this is just another occurrence of #341181. I thought this had
> > been fixed for some reason[1]. I'll go ahead and close this one and
> > undo [1] for ia64.
> >
> > [1] svn diff
* Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-12 12:46]:
> mips-linus-merge-post-rc5
> The last one contains a part, modifying include/asm-mips/atomic.h. It
> appears that there were some additional changes to that file, so patch in
> svn does not match the upstream sources now. Please review it to
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, dann frazier wrote:
> sorry; this is just another occurrence of #341181. I thought this had
> been fixed for some reason[1]. I'll go ahead and close this one and
> undo [1] for ia64.
>
> [1] svn diff svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel -r5595:5597
hmm indeed there is the segfa
hello dannf,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:00:35PM +, Dann Frazier wrote:
> Log:
> * [ia64] use yaird on ia64 until #341181 is fixed
hm indeed the bug itself is not closed.
can you please verify that this bug is still relevant for your decision?
#341181 is about ia64 shared klibc.
since klibc 1
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:11:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356544: No sound in sarge with kernel 2.4 of woody
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
I pruned 2.6.16-rc6, the (signed) orig tarball is to be found here:
http://people.debian.org/~fs/linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc6.orig.tar.gz
http://people.debian.org/~fs/linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc6.orig.tar.gz.sha1.asc
Thanks to tbm for pointin
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:38:58AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>
> hey Ryan,
> Your best bet is to continue to push for upstream acceptance:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
What about the fact that bigphysarea was included in Debian's 2.4
kernel? That causes
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:49:32 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:14:04 +0100
> Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > it seems this works again with 2.6.15
> > +2.6.16-rc5-0experimental.1snapshot.6069
>
> Hmm - ok.
Actually, I now suspect you ran
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:55:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line sorry - duplicate
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
sorry; this is just another occurrence of #341181. I thought this had
been fixed for some reason[1]. I'll go ahead and close this one and
undo [1] for ia64.
[1] svn diff svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel -r5595:5597
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Package: kernel-image-2.4-386
Version: 2.4
Hi Debian,
I am on an old laptop compaq armada 1592DT.
I installed woody 1 year ago and upgraded to Sarge stable 3 months ago.
On woody, I had the kernel 2.4 and I never got sound, I have only beeps on games
or on shell.
I installed modules in kernel from
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 23:45 -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> Hi debian-kernel,
>
> I asked a little while ago why Debian doesn't include the bigphysarea
> patch:
> http://pv105234.reshsg.uci.edu/~jfeise/Downloads/zr36120/
> This is necessary for hardware which doesn't support scatter gather DMA.
> I
Package: linux-headers-2.6.15-1
Version: 2.6.15-8
Severity: important
I could not compile bttv module from linux-headers package.
Also missing from same dir (drivers/media/video/):
bt848.h
btcx-risc.h
[ this is for compiling lirc_gpio driver, other headers could be
missing, ask to lirc maintai
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:39:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug no longer present
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
18 matches
Mail list logo
