Bug#349472: Tagging experimental, pending

tag 349472 experimental pending thanks Hi, This bug has been fixed in svn by commit 5759. As it only affects experimental and is going to be fixed by the next upload to experimental, tagging appropriately. Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] K

Processed: Tagging experimental, pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 349472 experimental pending Bug#349472: kernel-package - generates broken versions Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible Tags added: experimental, pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Processed: Missing linux-doc is going to be fixed in the next upload

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 348332 pending Bug#348332: linux-image-2.6.15-1-sparc64: suggests non-existent package There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#348332: Missing linux-doc is going to be fixed in the next upload

tags 348332 pending thanks Hi, The linux-doc package does exist, but was not built due to a kernel-package bug. It's going to be fixed in the next upload. See #352000 for more information. Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.woo

Kernel-handbook - opinions/comments wanted

Hi, I've recently finished the chapter on the recommended practices for reporting bugs in the kernel packages. It can be found at http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-bugs.html I would like to hear any opinions/comments/criticisms regarding it, so that this part of the handbook is agree

Bug#353651: linux-2.6: [powerpc] cannot probe macio devices during boot--breaks eth0 on upgrade from 2.4

Package: linux-2.6 Severity: important Tags: patch -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI

Bug#353516: marked as done (linux-2.6: ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP should be different)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:32:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 353516 Bug#353516: linux-2.6: ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP should be different Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks, control, and have a nice day Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Bug#353516: Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3

reopen 353516 thanks, control, and have a nice day On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 14:53 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > bits/errno.h says: Linux has no ENOTSUP error code. > and linux themself don't specify this. I understand that. However, SUSv3 requires that it exist[0]: The header shall provide a de

Bug#353516: marked as done (linux-2.6: ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP should be different)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:53:23 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Processed: Re: Bug#353457: linux-source-2.6.15-4: CIFS_CLIENT locks system with multiple, parallel file access

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 353457 important Bug#353457: linux-source-2.6.15-4: CIFS_CLIENT locks system with multiple, parallel file access Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Bug#353457: linux-source-2.6.15-4: CIFS_CLIENT locks system with multiple, parallel file access

severity 353457 important thanks On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 06:31:52PM +0100, Juergen Pfennig wrote: > Justification: renders package unusable No, it does not. > This bug is easy to reproduce: try to run synaptic against a cache that is > accessed via > cifs. synaptic /or dpkg?/ would download mu

Re: renaming kernel-patch-* to linux-patch-* ?

#include * Filippo Giunchedi [Sat, Feb 18 2006, 06:29:40PM]: > Hi, > I was wondering if it would sensible to rename kernel-patch-* to > linux-patch-* to follow current rename from kernel- to linux- (sorry if > this has been discussed before, pointers welcome) > This rename would be good only for l

Bug#353461: [2.6.16-rc3,powerpc] asm/highmem.h not found (ARCH=ppc vs. ARCH=powerpc)

On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 06:52:41PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Severity: important > Version: 2.6.15+2.6.16-rc3-0experimental.0snapshot.5916 > > [ Sven tells me to file a bug here; although this package is unofficial > and not-in-Debian I'll do so. complain at him if you th

Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 227386 important Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3 Severity set to `important'. > clone 227386 -1 Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3 Bug 227386 cloned as bug 353516. > reassign -1 l