On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:24:51AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:51:52AM +, Horms wrote:
> > Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh look, why are you still fighting about this? It seems to me that the
> > > real problem is that the via module doesn't d
Holger Levsen wrote:
>> * Unfortunatly, nobody from the kernel team is really interested in
>> working on 2.4 anymore. They do security fixes for the 2.4 kernels
>> in woody and sarge, for which I'm very thankful, but that's about it.
>>
>> Even though 2.4 is moving very slowly nowada
also sprach Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.05.2306 +0100]:
> Ah, ... then yaird should work then.
I am not going to try it on a server that's a couple of hundred
kilometres away.
> Not sure if fixes to initrd-tools are considered for sarge updates though.
Probably not, that's why I gav
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:59:18PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:36:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 04:05:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > I see the above error when running mkinitrd, and I think it's
> > > related. FYI, the followin
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:36:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 04:05:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > I see the above error when running mkinitrd, and I think it's
> > related. FYI, the following patch to /usr/sbin/mkinitrd works,
> > tested for 3w-, but it should
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 04:05:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I see the above error when running mkinitrd, and I think it's
> related. FYI, the following patch to /usr/sbin/mkinitrd works,
> tested for 3w-, but it should be the same for 3w-9xxx. Just
> changed the echo line...
initrd-tool
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 03:33:31AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> > reassign 349354 initramfs-tools,kernel-2.6,udev
> Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev depend
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 03:57:45PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 29 January 2006 00:30, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > There are several reasons why 2.4 is still interesting:
> > - Kernel 2.6 is still a moving target...
>
> As Marco d'Itri pointed out, this will stay this way,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> reassign 310455 kernel
Bug#310455: debian-installer: ugly font on laptop
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Your message dated Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:24:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 351523 udev
Bug#351523: initramfs-tools: Add support for filesystem labels and uuid's
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `udev'.
> tags 351523 patch
Bug#351523: initramfs-tools: Add support for filesystem labels and uuid's
Tags w
reassign 351523 udev
tags 351523 patch
thanks
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 03:20:47PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
>
> By adding /sbin/vol_id to the generated initramfs image, udev is able to
> create the persistent device nodes under /dev/disk such as
> /dev/disk/by-label/rootpartition which means
I see the above error when running mkinitrd, and I think it's
related. FYI, the following patch to /usr/sbin/mkinitrd works,
tested for 3w-, but it should be the same for 3w-9xxx. Just
changed the echo line...
However, this is a dirty workaround and should *not* be included
with a package (it
On Sunday 05 February 2006 15:57, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hhpa has dropped 2.4 support for sarge... s390 also doesnt seem
> sensible.
2.6 support for S/390 has missing pieces (mainly hardware configuration
stuff). Waldi has been working on this recently, but a full switch to 2.6
is not yet an opt
Hi,
On Sunday 29 January 2006 00:30, Holger Levsen wrote:
> There are several reasons why 2.4 is still interesting:
> - Kernel 2.6 is still a moving target...
As Marco d'Itri pointed out, this will stay this way, so I'm confirmed, that
some people will continue to want to use 2.4 instead
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.51
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
By adding /sbin/vol_id to the generated initramfs image, udev is able to
create the persistent device nodes under /dev/disk such as
/dev/disk/by-label/rootpartition which means that the kernel can be
booted with an argument
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 349354 serious
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
severity 349354 serious
thanks
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 01:01:09PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> as discussed with vorlon this needs to be resolved soon.
as not discussed with the kernel team, this is a problem and the release
team can decide to overwrite this on there own.
Bastian
--
Ahead
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> severity 349354 serious
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
severity 349354 important
stop dude
as discussed with vorlon this needs to be resolved soon.
but latest klibc in testing needs that i-t release,
so let it slip for now, or we'll break to many systems.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 349354 important
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Severity set to `important'.
> stop dude
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 349765 patch
Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> reassign 349354 initramfs-tools,linux-2.6,udev
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools,linux-2.6,udev' to
`initramfs-t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> # wrong package name
> reassign 349354 initramfs-tools,linux-2.6,udev
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-2.6'
Bug reassigned
tags 349765 patch
thanks
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 01:48:21AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > After changing addr to value, compiles fine; prctl -q runs ok now, prctl
> > --unaligned=signal doesn't have any effect. You say that it's going to be
> > the prctl() function in the kernel that needs furt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> reassign 349354 initramfs-tools,kernel-2.6,udev
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-2.6'
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 317386 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686: Oops with USB webcam module loaded
Bug#317386: Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
Changed Bug title.
> severity 317386 normal
Bug#317386: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686: Oops with USB webcam module loaded
Severity s
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 03:14:38AM -0500, Tristan Plumb wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
> Version: 2.6.15-4
>
> When installing linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 with the initramfs-tools from
> testing, during the initramfs generation I got the following messages:
>
> ...
> Setting up linux-ima
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-4
When installing linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 with the initramfs-tools from
testing, during the initramfs generation I got the following messages:
...
Setting up linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 (2.6.15-4) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
29 matches
Mail list logo
