On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:31:50AM -0330, Lawrence Williams wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> I am asking for the in-kernel pwc module (Philips USB webcam) to be disabled
> by default, as it doesn't work with the majority of their webcam chipsets
Nope wrong, they ju
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Hi,
I am asking for the in-kernel pwc module (Philips USB webcam) to be disabled
by default, as it doesn't work with the majority of their webcam chipsets
commonly in use. More importantly, it also conflicts with the resulting
package built from the sourc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 339080 + pending
Bug#339080: Frequent crash in handle_IRQ_event on alpha with kernel 2.6
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:03:13PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> I think everyone agrees that a) is not a possibility. Both b) and c) require a
> non-negligible amount of work, altough b) is less work than c), but c) is the
> better solution, and also to the best of my knowledge the one which upstrea
Hi all,
I am cross posting to debian-release and debian-boot, since this will affect
them too.
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:04:45AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at least I lost track a bit, so this mail is basically a question to
> bring me up to speed.
Ok, we had a long discussion on #
Package: linux-doc-2.6.14
Severity: wishlist
It's neat, all I have to do is
install linux-image-686
which will get linux-image-2.6-686,
which will get the latest image.
Alas, there is no similar way to get the latest linux-doc. One must do
it by hand. install linux-doc-2.6 doesn't work like the a
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:43:28PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>
> > On Jan 04, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Not to mention that 2.6.15 requires a newer udev. Who knows what other
> >> newer
> >> things newer kernels might require.
> >
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 07:00:00PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 06:24:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:35:40PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:58:16PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 06:24:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:35:40PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:58:16PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:50:47PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > > Hallo,
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:35:40PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:58:16PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:50:47PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > Hallo,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:10:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 346543 linux-2.6
Bug#346543: udev netlink problems with kernel 2.6.15 on alpha
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:58:16PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:50:47PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Hallo,
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:10:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:04:45AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > Now, my que
Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:37:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux-2.6: Failed to bring up eth1.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
Severity: wishlist
File: kernel-image-2.6.8
The double click on touchpad mouse's don't function to notebook Dell
Latitude CSx model. (The same problem don't occur with
kernel-image-2.4).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Archite
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 05:27:09PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> please try against lastest 2.6.14 in unstable,
yes, eth1394 works fine now on 2.6.14
thanks, piem
> tomorrow 2.6.15 should be available.
>
> is the bug still reproducible?
>
> --
> maks
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Sunday 08 January 2006 22:50, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:23:54PM +, David Goodenough wrote:
> > Could you put in the change that was in the hostap-source since
> > 2003 and is not in the in kernel version of hostap. Line 31 (a #define)
> > is commented
Bonjour Max|Maks
maximilian attems wrote:
c'est une trop belle langue .. non ??
oui, j'imagine difficile a apprendre car tres riche, mais tres belle,
effectivement... Merci ! :-)
please test against linux-image-2.6.15 in the archive?
aboves mentioned option is disabled.
Yes I did it thi
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:51:46AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:35:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:08:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Package: linux-2.6
> > > Version: 2.6.14-7
> > > Severity: important
>
> > > Sigh, can't get a br
* Sven Luther wrote:
> matroxfb is problematic, since the matroxfb maintainer didn't agree
> on the 2.4->2.6 fbdev API change, and thus things broke all over,
> and has a huge patch that reverses the new fbdev stuff. At least
> this was the case a year or two back at least.
Last time I tried matro
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:35:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:08:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.14-7
> > Severity: important
> > Sigh, can't get a break with alpha kernel support around here. After
> > upgrading to 2.6.14 (fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #346246: Can't install nvidia drivers, which was filed against the
> linux-source-2.6.15 package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:08:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.14-7
> Severity: important
>
> Sigh, can't get a break with alpha kernel support around here. After
> upgrading to 2.6.14 (from 2.4.27), the Matrox framebuffer no longer works
> correctly on my alp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 347177 linux-2.6
Bug#347177: system Hang on linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.15'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.15' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.14-7
Severity: important
Sigh, can't get a break with alpha kernel support around here. After
upgrading to 2.6.14 (from 2.4.27), the Matrox framebuffer no longer works
correctly on my alpha with a Matrox Millenium II. The matroxfb_base module
loads without error,
Package: linux-image-2.6.15
Version: 2.6.15-1-k7-1
System hangs on send/revc data with dialup connection. Simply connect
with a dialup connection (configured with pppconfig, connected with
pon), open a Firefox browser window and open few tabs. System hangs.
Sometimes I have the same problem
25 matches
Mail list logo
