Horms wrote:
> Holger kindly reminded me on IRC yesterday that its been
> a long time since a new 2.4.27 was uploaded into Sarge.
> He pointed out that there are a number of valuable fixes
> in SVN.
Is there any reason why you're sticking with 2.4.27+patches rather than
following the 2.4 series u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, Sven, do not cc me: I am subscribed to the kernel list!
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 02:48:01 +0100
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:13:50 +0100
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328534 grave
Bug#328534: Kernel panic on Adaptec 2100S on boot
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 335656 grave
Bug#335656: linux-image-2.6.13-1-386: PCI error
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 337974 grave
Bug#337974: linux-image-2.6.12-1-
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:13:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hi all, ...
>
> Well, fs uploaded 2.6.14-4, and i think now is a good time to examine the
> current situation and make a status summary, and plan for the future.
Ok, i did a bit of cleanup of the RC bugs, and there seems to be the fol
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:13:50 +0100
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jonas, maybe you would feel like adding a wiki page with the arch
> > status or something ?
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 286756 important
Bug#286756: udev gets tmpfs kernel support test wrong
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:13:50 +0100
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonas, maybe you would feel like adding a wiki page with the arch
> status or something ?
Sorry - I don't understand - what do you want different from the arch
status notes o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310244 important
Bug#310244: kernel-source-2.6.11: Kernel BUG at kernel/timer.c:473!
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 07:15:22PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:13:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Anyway, i will start with the powerpc situation :
> >
>
> parisc:
> - klibc will work after this patch is applied:
> http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2005-Nov
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:13:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Anyway, i will start with the powerpc situation :
>
parisc:
- klibc will work after this patch is applied:
http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2005-November/001174.html
- I haven't (and won't for the next month) have t
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-3
Severity: normal
The linux kernel now does not boot for me. This is with udev 0.076-1
installed, and with hotplug purged. The IDE subsystem seems to be
initialized correctly, but /dev/hda1 does not exist. I get (copied by
hand):
hda: FUJITS
I have a NetRAID-1M and have been trying to use it in a 2.6.11 or
greater kernel. Google has not helped, and neither has the linux-scsi
ml. Is this patch ready or is more modification still needed?
Thanks for any pointers!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Hi all, ...
Well, fs uploaded 2.6.14-4, and i think now is a good time to examine the
current situation and make a status summary, and plan for the future.
We would like 2.6.15 to be uploaded soon after it is released, and for that to
happen, we need to either push 2.6.14 into testing (and kill t
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The devices
Bus 004 Device 003: ID 068e:00ff CH Products, Inc. Flight Sim Yoke
Bus 004 Device 002: ID 068e:00f2 CH Products, Inc. Flight Sim Pedals
on my machine get recognized but they don't work. cat'ting the
relevant /d
I've been working with this problem over the weekend, and I have the
following facts to add to the mix.
(1) As far as I can tell, this is a problem with udev, not with 2.6.14
only. I tried to boot my machine using udev on 2.6.12, and ran into what
seems to be the same problem:
/sbin/init: 43
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.40
Severity: grave
udev 0.76 failed to queue events correctly and didn't populate /dev at
all using initramfs-tools. I only got a /dev/.udev/failed.
No devices in /dev lead to failure to find root and no boot.
To get up and running again I had to build a new i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Although the original report says, "After 250 days, the jiffies overflow
and ipt_recent do not work anymore" and is for 2.4, I've actually found
that the code included in 2.6.8 (and probably any kernel version that
includes ipt_recent) causes unexpect
Jurij,
I am re-sending this email because I just checked the bug report and I do
not see it listed -- so I assume it went astray.
That's probably my fault, even though I would think that if Makefile would
be written correctly, and fixdep binary already present (and it is
present), then it wo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 340953 linux-2.6
Bug#340953: linux-2.6: oops when asking ipv6 route when no public address?
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8'
Bug reassigned from packa
hi all,
I had the following problem:
description: CardBus bridge
product: PCI1250
vendor: Texas Instruments
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:12:59PM +0200, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 02:26:17AM +0200, Daniel Ritz wrote:
> > On Tuesda
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
H> If you know more, please add your knowledge below.
[skip]
2.6.14-2 still enables the outdated ieee80211 :(
Fixing this is simply a matter of disabling CONFIG_IEEE80211. This
will allow to use ipw2200 (ipw2100 also) drivers built using
module-assistant as befo
Frederik Schueler writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 02:17:46PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: PCI DMA: High address but no IOMMU
>
> Did you activate the IOMMU in the bios?
I can't see any option with that name (or anything similar in the
BIOS).
22 matches
Mail list logo
