On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:57:59 +0200 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 10:35:45PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > But please wait doing too much about that. I'd like to have it setup
> > > differ
Hi Marco,
The original report states that downgrading udev and using it with the
*same* kernel fixes the situation. How can it be a kernel bug?
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03
Accepted:
yaird_0.0.11-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-6.diff.gz
yaird_0.0.11-6.dsc
to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-6.dsc
yaird_0.0.11-6_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-6_powerpc.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for your contribu
yaird_0.0.11-6_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yaird_0.0.11-6.dsc
yaird_0.0.11-6.diff.gz
yaird_0.0.11-6_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 10:05:32PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > backup your data, aboves is a drive failure.
>
> Well, at first I thought the same, but when I went back to 2.6.12 for
> another reason the message disappeared. That's kind of stran
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 23:07 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Any comments?
Martin Wilck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0. the module loading tool runs during boot with PID 1.
I do not understand how this can happen. request_module() cannot occur
until usermodehelper_init() is called. This is only don
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 334104 linux-2.6
Bug#334104: udev upgrade breaks networking (Davicom NIC)
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 334104 tulip driver advertises support for non-working card
Bug#334104: udev upgrade breaks networking (Davi
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.31.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.31.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.31.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.31.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.31_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.31_all.deb
Announcing to debian-deve
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333755: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.31
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
initramfs-tools_0.31_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.31.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.31.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.31_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 334348 + wontfix
Bug#334348: kernel-kbuild-2.6-3: Warning for mismatched gcc versions suggested
Tags were: patch
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
tags 334348 + wontfix
thanks
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:13:40PM -0400, Marv Stodolsky wrote:
> Package: kernel-kbuild-2.6-3
> Version: 2.6.8-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> kernel-kbuild is used for building modem drivers and others.
> But a properly compiled module will under 2.6.n fail
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:23:57 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I had a quick look at the yaird diff, but it uses getopt vs getopts
> > (or vice-versa), and this would mean changing initramfs-tools (and
> > initr
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:55:35AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Sorry, my fault. I sent in the wrong oops. Actually the oops made me try
> nv again and since it works correctly with my card now I was finally
> able to get rid of nvidia.
Even this oops shows a tainted kernel.
Bastian
--
Ahead
Package: kernel-kbuild-2.6-3
Version: 2.6.8-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
kernel-kbuild is used for building modem drivers and others.
But a properly compiled module will under 2.6.n fail to load if the
gcc versions of driver and host kernel are not adequately matched.
Perhaps put a warning in
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:02:07PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:46:40 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You just joined the wrong network, we are on oftc, no more on
> > freenode due to their stupid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:46:40 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You just joined the wrong network, we are on oftc, no more on
> freenode due to their stupid policies.
Oh no. I don't know how to join multiple networks simultanously :-(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:23:57 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a quick look at the yaird diff, but it uses getopt vs getopts
> (or vice-versa), and this would mean changing initramfs-tools (and
> initrd-tools) beyond what i am confo
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:31:00AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:31:20 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Exactly. So you do read my mind after all :-D
> >
> > Oh, and BTW, we usually hang around on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:31:20 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Exactly. So you do read my mind after all :-D
>
> Oh, and BTW, we usually hang around on #debian-kernel on
> irc.oftc.net, in case you are irc inclined.
Oh, you not only r
Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17388
This issue is also valid in debian AFAIK, please manage this controller
adding both modules to the initramfs image. Of course, a workaround
is adding the right module to /etc/mkinitramfs/modules by hand.
-
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Anyway, i think this is well suited for you to use, but less so if
> > Erik wants to use the repo for upstream work too, so you two have to
> > discuss what you want to obtain exactly.
>
> Ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:57:59 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 10:35:45PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > But please wait doing too much about that. I'd like to have it setup
> > differently - or at least discu
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 10:05:32PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> backup your data, aboves is a drive failure.
Well, at first I thought the same, but when I went back to 2.6.12 for
another reason the message disappeared. That's kind of strange. I do not
get any ide error message with 2.6.12 and
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 08:45:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 08:18:49PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Oct 16 19:04:15 feivel kernel: EIP:0060:[sysfs_release+59/128]
> > Tainted: PF VLI
>
> Proprietary module and forced module load. Fix that first.
Sorry,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:18:02AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:52:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > - initramfs-tools needs to be uploaded, it seems to wait for mklibs in
> > NEW,
> > but i was able to build it just fine, no idea what is going on here.
>
> This
>From the too many branches dept.
Sven and I have decided to move 2.6.14-rc4 into trunk/linux-2.6, there
seems no reason not to do that, and hopefully we can move that to 2.6.14
the moment it comes out. Sven tells me there are a few broken patches,
but it should be ok. This was previously trunk/l
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:52:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> - initramfs-tools needs to be uploaded, it seems to wait for mklibs in NEW,
> but i was able to build it just fine, no idea what is going on here.
This is fixed since yesterday.
Bastian
--
It is undignified for a woman to play
28 matches
Mail list logo
