Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 329989 confirmed
Bug#329989: snd_usb_audio unknown symbols
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
tags 329989 confirmed
thanks
Hi,
I have reproduced that bug. And it is not inlining problem, because I
tried building it with all inline functions in sound/usb/usbaudio.c
replaced by #define's, and it did not help. I'll try to dig further.
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:31:12PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 04:15 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:49:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj
Subject: linux-image-2.6.12-1-alpha-smp: trying to kill interrupt handler
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-alpha-smp
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
at boot tile, I can see a kernel panic with message:
trying t
> the title says it all...
-> linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 loads every ide pci module at boot time
This is a know problem since around 2.6.10. The problem is
that due to some broken locking semantics inside the kernel,
it is not safe to unload the ide modules, and more to the point,
the kernel doesn'
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:31:12PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 04:15 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:49:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:41:40AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> reassign 258043 linux-2.6
> stop
>
> [2.6.7 is no longer in any release, reassigning to linux-2.6.]
>
> Today we have a general policy for what patches go into the Debian
> source: http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelPatchAcceptance
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 05:42:15PM +0200, Uwe Mesecke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since the kernel-upgrade there were no more crashes in a result of that
> "kernel bug" but we also figured out that most of the crashes the days
> before were caused by a dead cpu cooler so I cannot say wether the new
> kern
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 04:15 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:49:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > So we are taki
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:49:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
> > > couple of change
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:49:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
> > > couple of change
Dear friends,
We are sending this letter to invite you to inform about the project of the
Humanist Center of Cultures that we have launched in neighborhoods throughout
New York City and Cities world wide to respond to the growing difficulties and
concerns among the diversity of people and our c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 330583 important
Bug#330583: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: pdc202xx - system doesn't boot with kernel
2.6.12
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing he
[re-adding debian-kernel to the cc list, with Mark's permission]
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 11:28 -0700, Allyn, Mark A wrote:
> Dann:
>
> I am curious, what happens if I submit patches only to www.kernel.org
> (the upstream) and wait?
If they're accepted, they'll probably end up in a Debian kernel
au
I've worked around this in 2.6.12-10 by making the -mckinley & -itanium
flavors the same as their -smp counterparts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
> > couple of changes to it an uploading? Whynot just take the very
> > latest version of ker
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
> couple of changes to it an uploading? Whynot just take the very
> latest version of kernel-package and put that in t-p-u?
Because we are aiming volatile
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After installing kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-7 the system doesn't boot
anymore giving the following error messages:
hdh: dma_intr: status = 0x51 { DriveReady SeekCompleteError}
hdh:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: normal
Hi all,
I am running an IBM Laptop Thinkpad R40 2681-HSG with Debian
Unstable. With kernel-2.6.12-1 something seems to be broken wit
apm: when I send the laptop into suspend using "apm -s" the
laptop sleeps for roughly 3-4 min
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 10:10 -0700, Allyn, Mark A wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I have been recently put into a position where I might need
> to add and/or change device drivers in the kernel.
>
> I have some questions about protocol and preferences within
> the Debian community.
>
> First of all, I do un
Folks:
I have been recently put into a position where I might need
to add and/or change device drivers in the kernel.
I have some questions about protocol and preferences within
the Debian community.
First of all, I do understand that anything I submit to be
added to Debian must be covered by t
reassign 258043 linux-2.6
stop
[2.6.7 is no longer in any release, reassigning to linux-2.6.]
Today we have a general policy for what patches go into the Debian
source: http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
And, all patches are now split up and available in the
linux-pat
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:25:59 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> user debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-kernel@lists.debian.org (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> usertag 319979 dkt-pending-new-upstream
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: dkt-pending-new-upstream.
> reassign 319979 linux-2.6
Bug
user debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
usertag 319979 dkt-pending-new-upstream
reassign 319979 linux-2.6
stop
Its clear that this bug shouldn't be fixed in sarge, whose only updates
will be security or potentially other fixes deemed important enough to
enter a stable release. 2.6.8 will soon be remo
This bug hasn't been reported by anyone else, and no more information
was provided by the submitter in a number of months, so I'm closing it.
My guess is the submitter was out of disk space, fwiw.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> user debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-kernel@lists.debian.org (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> usertag 330520 + dkt-pending-package-removal
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: dkt-pending-package-removal.
> tag 330520 + pending
user debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
usertag 330520 + dkt-pending-package-removal
tag 330520 + pending
thanks
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 16:04 +0200, Rainer Birkenmaier wrote:
> Package: kernel-headers-2.6.8-2
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: important
>
> When compiling external modules that use includ
Hi,
since the kernel-upgrade there were no more crashes in a result of that
"kernel bug" but we also figured out that most of the crashes the days
before were caused by a dead cpu cooler so I cannot say wether the new
kernel really fixed the bug or not.
Regards
Uwe
pgprxw1eVWeEH.pgp
Descript
CLIENT ID - 7595
Contact Attempt #: 2
After finalizing your mort-refinance application we
are sorry to inform you that we cannot finance you for
the 3.67% rate we quoted. We however can try
to finance your home at a rate of 4.14%.
We apologize for this inconvenience.
Reassessment & Confirmatio
Package: kernel-headers-2.6.8-2
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: important
When compiling external modules that use include/asm-i386/processor.h
there is the following error
include/asm/processor.h:87: error: array type has incomplete element type
The patch to solve this is the following:
Hi,
So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
couple of changes to it an uploading? Whynot just take the very
latest version of kernel-package and put that in t-p-u?
manoj
--
An object never serves the same function as its image -- or its
name. Rene Magritte
Mano
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:34:11 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Sven Luther has prepared an update of kernel-package that fixes some
> minor problems that prevent the sarge version from being able to
> compile linux-2.6, which we would like to get included in volatile.
> I'm writing t
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 05:43:45AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
> Version: 2.6.12-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: upstream
>
> Gentlemen, Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt.gz,
> and the relevant Documentation/*/*/*ACPI*/ document (that I cannot
> find), should both emp
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.12-10_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.12-10_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-atari_2.6.12-10_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-atari_2.6.12-10_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-bvme6000_2.6.12-10_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l
linux-2.6_2.6.12-10_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-10_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-10_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-10_m68k.deb
linux-image-amiga_2.6.12-10_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6-amiga_2.6.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Unfortunately 2.6.12-9 had a FTBS on hppa (##330157).
> > > I'll likely release -10 tomorrow, so best old off for that.
> > > With a bit of luck we can produce a kernel that actually builds :-)
> >
> > Hi Michael, 2.6.12-10 seem
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:36:24AM +0200, Eric Lavarde - Debian Bugs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried with the given kernel and the result is:
> - exactly the same symptons as in 2.6.8
Ok, thanks for checking.
> - the backported kernel is built with gcc 4.0.2 (not sure about the
> subdigits) which are n
> > Unfortunately 2.6.12-9 had a FTBS on hppa (##330157).
> > I'll likely release -10 tomorrow, so best old off for that.
> > With a bit of luck we can produce a kernel that actually builds :-)
>
> Hi Michael, 2.6.12-10 seems to be going pretty well,
> could you kick of a build of that?
I'll fetch
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 23:50 -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:35:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > > linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
> > > build should be requeued, preferably on a
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:26:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Chapter 4 of the file hiearchy standard says that /usr should not be
> written to. The unpacking of the source into /usr in a postinst would
> create data that lives outside of the dpkg database, so unpacking source
> there automatica
Hi,
I tried with the given kernel and the result is:
- exactly the same symptons as in 2.6.8
- the backported kernel is built with gcc 4.0.2 (not sure about the
subdigits) which are not part of Sarge, making building of additional
modules impossible. Such a backported kernel should be built with g
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:42:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:31:49PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > I have uploaded linux-2.6 2.6.12-9 just now, its currently in incoming
> > and should get into the archive in the next day. Sven Luther
> > asked me to let you kn
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:31:04PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > I have uploaded linux-2.6 2.6.12-9 just now, its currently in incoming
> > and should get into the archive in the next day. Sven Luther asked me to
> > let you know when this happens so you can kick of a cross compile on
> > m68k.
Chapter 4 of the file hiearchy standard says that /usr should not be
written to. The unpacking of the source into /usr in a postinst would
create data that lives outside of the dpkg database, so unpacking source
there automatically would be a violation of the FHS, in my opinion.
Creation of data
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-sparc64-smp_2.6.12-10_sparc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-sparc64-smp_2.6.12-10_sparc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-sparc64_2.6.12-10_sparc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-sparc64_2.6.12-10_sparc.deb
linux-headers-2.6-sparc64-smp_2.6.12-10_sparc.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:35:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
> > build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk
> > space available.
>
> Thanks for th
47 matches
Mail list logo
