Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:33:02 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line worked for me too
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
> build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk
> space available.
Thanks for that information. I think Dannf was plaining to
do a binary-upload. B
This built fine for me in a fresh sid pbuilder chroot. I've uploaded
the result of that build.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-2.6_2.6.12-10_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-10_sparc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-sparc64_2.6.12-10_sparc.deb
linux-image-2.6.12-1-sparc64_2.6.12-10_sparc.deb
linux-image-sparc64_2.6.12-10_sparc.deb
linux-image-2.6
tags 330412 + wontfix
thanks
After discussion on IRC, we think it would be best for the submitter to
work directly with upstream to come up with an appropriate solution.
Its not possible for us to know when a Documentation file was last
modified - that would require an addition to upstream subm
linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk
space available.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 330455 dkt-work-in-progress-upstream
usertag 330455 dkt-work-in-progress
tag 330455 +upstream
severity 330455 wishlist
reassign 330455 linux-2.6
thanks
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:05:21AM +0200, Christophe Branchereau wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
> Version: 2.6.12-6
> Severity
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:05:21AM +0200, Christophe Branchereau wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
> Version: 2.6.12-6
> Severity: important
Known problem, will be fixed by the use of yaird instead of initrd-tools. not
sure how initramfs behaves in this way.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 316809 + pending
Bug#316809: kernel-source-2.6.11: tell where to find the Debian .config
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
tags 316809 + pending
thanks
This is fixed in svn for both 2.6.12 & 2.6.13.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=f
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:42:13 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 330445 kernel-package
Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
Bug reassigned from package
`linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc,linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6,kernel-package' to
`kernel-package'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
reassign 330445 kernel-package
thanks
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:22:38PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
> Package:
> linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc,linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6,kernel-package
> Severity: serious
>
> The problem:
> * linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 build-depends on kernel images.
> * build d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 330446 + pending
Bug#330446: fails to purge if module utilities are not installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 330412 + wontfix
Bug#330412: linux-doc: often no date info on when documents were written
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
tags 330446 + pending
thanks
I've comitted the following patch to svn.
--- debian/initrd-tools.postrm (revision 4292)
+++ debian/initrd-tools.postrm (working copy)
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
if [ "$1" = purge ]; then
rm -rf /etc/mkinitrd
- update-modules
+ if [ -x /sbin/update-module
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:50:12PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As others have pointed out, 2.6.12 kernels require newer udev, which is
> not present in sarge. Unless the problem may be reproduced in an
> up-to-date sid environment, I don't see a reason for this bug report to be
> opene
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:03:01AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 05:43:45AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
> > Version: 2.6.12-2
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: upstream
> >
> > Gentlemen, Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt.gz,
> > and the relevant Doc
Hi Lior,
Sorry that it took so long to react to your request. Did you have a chance
to test that patch and can confirm that it solves your problem?
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C9
Hi,
As others have pointed out, 2.6.12 kernels require newer udev, which is
not present in sarge. Unless the problem may be reproduced in an
up-to-date sid environment, I don't see a reason for this bug report to be
opened. I plan to close it in two weeks from today, unless some new
informati
Hell`o [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Would you like at least $[1500.00 to $}3500.00 per day just for returning phone
calls?
I do!
If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for this
program.
Give Us A Call 1 800 839 9032
this is a great opp%ortunlty for those who want to stay h
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.82
Severity: serious
sh-3.00# dpkg -P --pending
(Reading database ... 8535 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing initrd-tools ...
Purging configuration files for initrd-tools ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/initrd-tools.postrm: line 7: update-modules: comma
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc,linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6,kernel-package
Severity: serious
The problem:
* linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 build-depends on kernel images.
* build daemons install packages in noninteractive mode
* the kernel images do not install successfully in noninteractive mo
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 05:43:45AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
> Version: 2.6.12-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: upstream
>
> Gentlemen, Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt.gz,
> and the relevant Documentation/*/*/*ACPI*/ document (that I cannot
> find), should both emp
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:23:33PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2005 05:11, Horms wrote:
> > We spoke about this last month (or was it earlier this month,
> > I forget), and at that time 2.6.8 was still being used by d-i.
> > It seems that the transition to 2.6.12 is going pret
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 04:30:09PM +0100, Alexander Fisher wrote:
> On 9/27/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SNIP
> > > BTW am I better off making this sort of request on this list, or
> > > filing a wishlist bug against the source package?
> >
> > Filing a bug report.
> >
> > Friendly,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 330353 kernel-source-2.6.8: CAN-2005-3053
Bug#330353: linux-2.6: Two more local DoS vulnerabilities
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 330353 kernel-source-2.6.8
Bug#330353: kernel-source-2.6.8: CAN-2005-3053
Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6'
Yes, this was a typo -a missing '\n' in the control file. I committed a
fix last night.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: important
Hello,
The problem here is that if I configure the bios so that PINA to PIND use
IRQ11, wich is the BIOS default, yenta_socket, loaded by the pcmcia_cs package
or by hand, seems to load fine, here is the relevant part of d
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.27.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.27.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.27.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.27.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.27_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.27_all.deb
Announcing to debian-deve
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:22:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315654: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 17:51 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:29:49AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: no longer builds from source
> >
> >
> > Seems like 2.6.12-10 fails to build on sparc
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.p
Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-2
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.12/Documentation
Tags: upstream
Files like stable_api_nonsense.txt.gz should have the date at the top,
like many others there do. We are lucky to see he mentions kernel 2.6,
thus getting some idea of
Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-2
Severity: minor
File:
/usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.12/Documentation/cpu-freq/cpufreq-stats.txt.gz
cpufreq-stats.txt.gz mentions time_in_state total_trans trans_table,
however we Debian users, or me at least only see the first two.
Perhaps instructions
Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-2
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.12/Buildinfo.gz
I notice this file would be shorter uncompressed.
$ f=/usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.12/Buildinfo.gz
$ zcat $f|wc -c - $f
51 -
81 /usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.12/Buildinfo.gz
Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-2
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.12/Documentation/sysrq.txt.gz
Tags: upstream
sysrq.txt.gz should say more about "oom_kill". One doesn't know where
to look to learn more.
P.S., and please pass this to who is in charge:
When we try
Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Gentlemen, Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt.gz,
and the relevant Documentation/*/*/*ACPI*/ document (that I cannot
find), should both emphasize that
/proc/acpi/processor/CPU/throttling
and
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cp
retitle 330353 kernel-source-2.6.8: CAN-2005-3053
reassign 330353 kernel-source-2.6.8
tags 330353 + sarge
thanks
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 19:37 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: important
> Tags: security
>
> Two more local denial-of-service vulnerabilities have been
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 13:38 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:00 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > Do you mean that kexec doesn't work in SMP situations ? I am not sure
> > > what you
> > > mean about test situations and the
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 12:44 -0700, Richard Harke wrote:
> On Tue September 27 2005 11:00, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Do you mean that kexec doesn't work in SMP situations ? I am not sure
> > > what you mean about test situations and the SMP kernel sho
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 10:09 +0200, Emeric Maschino wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Isn't the hp workstation zx2000 a strictly monoprocessor system? I agree
> this model isn't for sale anymore.
>
> http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11665_na/11665_na.HTML
(re-adding debian-kernel to the cc list; I
> "Dann" == dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dann> The only concern I had prior to starting this thread is the
Dann> performance overhead; I'm interested in any benchmarks that
Dann> might be able to demonstrate a difference here.
Several years ago I did some benchmarking to decide wh
On Tue September 27 2005 11:00, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Do you mean that kexec doesn't work in SMP situations ? I am not sure
> > what you mean about test situations and the SMP kernel should work just
> > well in virtualized environments, but i have s
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 10:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2005 10:18 am, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > > > non-SMP kernels may be useful for a number of specialized uses. Think
> > > > about kexec, test situations, low memo
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:00 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Do you mean that kexec doesn't work in SMP situations ? I am not sure what
> > you
> > mean about test situations and the SMP kernel should work just well in
> > virtualized environments, b
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:00:27AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Do you mean that kexec doesn't work in SMP situations ? I am not sure what
> > you
> > mean about test situations and the SMP kernel should work just well in
> > virtualized environm
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Do you mean that kexec doesn't work in SMP situations ? I am not sure what you
> mean about test situations and the SMP kernel should work just well in
> virtualized environments, but i have some trouble equating ia64 machines with
> low memory situations
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 04:30:09PM +0100, Alexander Fisher wrote:
> On 9/27/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SNIP
> > > BTW am I better off making this sort of request on this list, or
> > > filing a wishlist bug against the source package?
> >
> > Filing a bug report.
> >
> > Friendly,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, dann frazier wrote:
>
> > The biggest headache with maintaining the ia64 kernel has probably been
> > with the non-SMP flavours. Generic/non-SMP configs seem to not get much
> > attention upstream. This mak
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Tags: security
Two more local denial-of-service vulnerabilities have been
found in the Linux 2.6 kernel:
CAN-2005-3055:
Linux kernel 2.6.8 to 2.6.14-rc2 allows local users to cause a denial of service
(kernel OOPS) via a userspace process that issues a USB R
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 05:11, Horms wrote:
> We spoke about this last month (or was it earlier this month,
> I forget), and at that time 2.6.8 was still being used by d-i.
> It seems that the transition to 2.6.12 is going pretty well,
> is the d-i team happy for 2.6.8 to be removed from the a
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 10:18 am, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> > > non-SMP kernels may be useful for a number of specialized uses. Think
> > > about kexec, test situations, low memory situations and running a
> > > kernel in a virtualized environ
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > non-SMP kernels may be useful for a number of specialized uses. Think
> > about kexec, test situations, low memory situations and running a
> > kernel in a virtualized environment.
>
> Should Debian be burdened with supplying kernels for these sit
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, dann frazier wrote:
>
> > The biggest headache with maintaining the ia64 kernel has probably been
> > with the non-SMP flavours. Generic/non-SMP configs seem to not get much
> > attention upstream. This mak
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, dann frazier wrote:
> The biggest headache with maintaining the ia64 kernel has probably been
> with the non-SMP flavours. Generic/non-SMP configs seem to not get much
> attention upstream. This makes sense given that most ia64 machines are
> SMP capable. In fact, I don't t
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:29:49AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
>
> Seems like 2.6.12-10 fails to build on sparc
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=linux-2.6&ver=2.6.12-10&arch=sparc&stamp=1127830883&file=log&a
On 9/27/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SNIP
> > BTW am I better off making this sort of request on this list, or
> > filing a wishlist bug against the source package?
>
> Filing a bug report.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
Thanks, I was about to when I spotted this ...
http://bugs.deb
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 04:44:56PM +0200, Vincent CATROS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build my own "2.6.8" kernel-image package based
> on "kernel-source-2.6.8" package.
>
> Everything seems ok except I didn't find how to instruct
> make-kpkg to add vesafb.ko (or other) to
> "/lib/modules/2.6.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 03:07:33PM +0100, Alexander Fisher wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> Any chance of enabling CONFIG_VIDEO_CX88 in time for the 2.6.13 kernel
> image packages? Its needed for the newer Hauppauge Nova-T DVB cards
> which are quite popular in the UK at least. I'm pretty sure that
> ext
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Seems like 2.6.12-10 fails to build on sparc
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=linux-2.6&ver=2.6.12-10&arch=sparc&stamp=1127830883&file=log&as=raw
LD sound/usb/usx2y/built-in.o
CC net/socket.o
Hi,
I am trying to build my own "2.6.8" kernel-image package based
on "kernel-source-2.6.8" package.
Everything seems ok except I didn't find how to instruct
make-kpkg to add vesafb.ko (or other) to
"/lib/modules/2.6.8-xxx/" as it is done in the official
kernel-image.
Any idea?
Regards.
Vincen
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 03:07:33PM +0100, Alexander Fisher wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> Any chance of enabling CONFIG_VIDEO_CX88 in time for the 2.6.13 kernel
> image packages? Its needed for the newer Hauppauge Nova-T DVB cards
> which are quite popular in the UK at least. I'm pretty sure that
> ext
Hi there.
Any chance of enabling CONFIG_VIDEO_CX88 in time for the 2.6.13 kernel
image packages? Its needed for the newer Hauppauge Nova-T DVB cards
which are quite popular in the UK at least. I'm pretty sure that
extra DVB patches haven't been needed since at least 2.6.12.
Many Thanks,
Alex
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:21:10PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > severity 330191 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
> >
> > > klibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> > > pbuilder. It also failed on some othe
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > adding cc to debian-kernel to investigate the mips/mipsel failure:
> > E: Couldn't find package linux-headers-2.6.12-1
>
> The mips/mipsel packages are only in experimental ATM. I hope to
> prepare an unstable upload t
test message
WBR spammer.. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maximilian attems wrote:
> severity 330191 serious
> thanks
>
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
>
> > klibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> > pbuilder. It also failed on some other buildds.
>
> thanks for your report and duplicating, will look into it.
>
>
severity 330191 serious
thanks
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
> klibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> pbuilder. It also failed on some other buildds.
thanks for your report and duplicating, will look into it.
the mips and mipsel failures are expected as t
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-10_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-10_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 02:17:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330157: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Tags: patch security
CAN-2005-3055 Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio
I beleive this applies to 2.6.12 and 2.6.13, we should put the patch
into whichever we release next. I'll try and get to that shortly.
Link with patch: http://marc.theaimsgroup
linux-2.6_2.6.12-10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.12-10.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.12-10.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-10_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-10_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-10_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-10_
73 matches
Mail list logo
