Hi,
we've suffered a few build problems on hppa and as a result 2.6.10-8 and
-9 FTBS. What I had prepared as -10 seems to also have been broken in
that regards. Fortuately I noticed this halfway through uploading, and
have withdrawn the upload.
Right now I am preparing 2.6.10-10 again. This incl
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:27:56AM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
>
> Horms writes...
>
> > We have a build problem with the kernel on hppa and I was hoping to
> > use paer.debian.org to do some test builds. If there is a better machine
> > please let me know.
>
> paer is the correct machine.
Thank
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:23:48PM +0300, Ilkka Pietikäinen wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
>
> Our userspace software uses QUEUE target with iptables. We have reports from
> our
> customers that their debian systems ar
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:33:11AM -0500, Jason Martens wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp
> Version: 2.6.12-6
> Severity: normal
>
> With this linux-image, DMA does not work with my cdrom burners. If I
> try to enable it, I get the following message:
> morpheus:~# hdparm -d1 /dev/hdb
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:54:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> So, i guess there is some uncleanliness in the serial_core.c hppa patch, or
> maybe someting else. Simon Horman mentioned that part of the hppa patch should
> be separated and rejoin the main debian patches instead of keeping such a
Hi,
We spoke about this last month (or was it earlier this month,
I forget), and at that time 2.6.8 was still being used by d-i.
It seems that the transition to 2.6.12 is going pretty well,
is the d-i team happy for 2.6.8 to be removed from the archive,
or would they like it left there for a bit l
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:04:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:35:00PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > > * Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > > > I'm working on a backport o
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:51:18PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> The biggest headache with maintaining the ia64 kernel has probably been
> with the non-SMP flavours. Generic/non-SMP configs seem to not get much
> attention upstream. This makes sense given that most ia64 machines are
> SMP capable.
I got this to work now by placing amd74xx as first entry
in /etc/modules. I'm not sure if that sort of manual intervention is
the normal solution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-8
Severity: important
hi,
for some reason the sbp2 module will not load properly -- it gives
errors about unknown symbols, viz.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo modprobe sbp2
sbp2: Unknown symbol bus_to_virt
FATAL: Error inserting sbp2
(/lib/mo
The biggest headache with maintaining the ia64 kernel has probably been
with the non-SMP flavours. Generic/non-SMP configs seem to not get much
attention upstream. This makes sense given that most ia64 machines are
SMP capable. In fact, I don't think there's a non-SMP capable ia64
machine on the
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Our userspace software uses QUEUE target with iptables. We have reports from our
customers that their debian systems are chrashing (with panics). With other
distrubutions
we have detected similar behavi
Horms writes...
> We have a build problem with the kernel on hppa and I was hoping to
> use paer.debian.org to do some test builds. If there is a better machine
> please let me know.
paer is the correct machine.
> Otherwise, would it be possible to get the following
> build dependancies install
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 06:18:55PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Arthur H. Johnson II [Mon, Sep 26 2005, 12:13:41PM]:
> >
> > cdrecord -v -dao -data dev=2,0,0 fs=12M speed=4 whatever.iso
>
> Google says it is an ATAPI device. Don't use the ide-scsi driver with
> kernel 2.6, it is not
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:17:56PM -0400, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Maximilian Attems wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:26:05AM -0400, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
> > > Version: 2.6.12-7
> > >
> > > I have an HP 8100 burner. ke
#include
* Arthur H. Johnson II [Mon, Sep 26 2005, 12:13:41PM]:
>
> cdrecord -v -dao -data dev=2,0,0 fs=12M speed=4 whatever.iso
Google says it is an ATAPI device. Don't use the ide-scsi driver with
kernel 2.6, it is not supported by upstream. See README.ATAPI.setup for
details and use something
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:26:05AM -0400, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
> > Version: 2.6.12-7
> >
> > I have an HP 8100 burner. kernel-image-2.6.6-1-k7 is burning CD's just
> > fine. When I upgraded to linux-image
cdrecord -v -dao -data dev=2,0,0 fs=12M speed=4 whatever.iso
This same command produces usable CD burns under 2.6.6 with cdrecord
2.01+01a03-2. There was an error in dmesg when I tried mounting the
2.6.12 burns, something about mounting past the limit? Windows won't
recognize the CD at all.
As
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:26:05AM -0400, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
> Version: 2.6.12-7
>
> I have an HP 8100 burner. kernel-image-2.6.6-1-k7 is burning CD's just
> fine. When I upgraded to linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 cd's appear to burn and
> fixate without erro
Hi!
just wanted to report, that the linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 has the same problems:
snd_usb_audio: Unknown symbol __compound_literal.170
snd_usb_audio: Unknown symbol __compound_literal.89
snd_usb_audio: Unknown symbol __compound_literal.173
snd_usb_audio: Unknown symbol __compound_literal.112
snd
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Version: 2.6.12-7
I have an HP 8100 burner. kernel-image-2.6.6-1-k7 is burning CD's just
fine. When I upgraded to linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 cd's appear to burn and
fixate without errors, however Linux and Windows can't mount the created
CD. Essentially ever cd wri
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: normal
With this linux-image, DMA does not work with my cdrom burners. If I
try to enable it, I get the following message:
morpheus:~# hdparm -d1 /dev/hdb
/dev/hdb:
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not pe
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-atari_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-atari_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-bvme6000_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linu
linux-2.6_2.6.12-8_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
linux-image-amiga_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6-amiga_2.6.12-8_
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:35:00PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > * Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > > I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is
> > > > to not have it require an
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:31:04PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > I have uploaded linux-2.6 2.6.12-9 just now, its currently in incoming
> > and should get into the archive in the next day. Sven Luther asked me to
> > let you know when this happens so you can kick of a cross compile on
> > m68k.
* Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is
> > > to not have it require any further backports.
> >
> > Just for info, I already prepared a backport of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 330157 +pending
Bug#330157: linux-2.6: [hppa] FTBFS -- hppa patch doesn't apply cleanly.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
tag 330157 +pending
thanks
I have fixed this in SVN by removing the spurious
drivers/serial/serial_core.c.orig portion of hppa.patch.
Kyle is doing a test build on hppa, and I will
upload tomorrow if that goes to plan.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
CLIENT ID - 7509
Contact Attempt #: 2
After finalizing your mort-refinance application we
are sorry to inform you that we cannot finance you for
the 3.68% rate we quoted. We however can try
to finance your home at a rate of 4.11%.
We apologize for this inconvenience.
Reassessment & Confirmatio
> I have uploaded linux-2.6 2.6.12-9 just now, its currently in incoming
> and should get into the archive in the next day. Sven Luther asked me to
> let you know when this happens so you can kick of a cross compile on
> m68k.
Thanks; I'll discard the -8 source then and fetch -9 out of incoming.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:31:49PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I have uploaded linux-2.6 2.6.12-9 just now, its currently in incoming
> and should get into the archive in the next day. Sven Luther
> asked me to let you know when this happens so you can kick
> of a cross compile on m68k.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Andres Salomon wrote:
> > I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to
> > not have it require any further backports.
>
> Just for info, I already prepared a backport of linux-2.6 for
> backports.org, bu
Hi,
We have a build problem with the kernel on hppa and I was hoping to
use paer.debian.org to do some test builds. If there is a better machine
please let me know. Otherwise, would it be possible to get the following
build dependancies installed in the sid chroot?
gcc-4.0-hppa64
module-init-too
* Andres Salomon wrote:
> I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to
> not have it require any further backports.
Just for info, I already prepared a backport of linux-2.6 for
backports.org, but I used a backported kernel-package for the build.
http://www.backports.org/pe
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.12-9
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi all, it seems our 2.6.12-9 upload failed on hppa, the log is at :
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=linux-2.6&ver=2.6.12-9&arch=hppa&stamp=1127729724&file=log&as=raw
And the extract of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 329614 +patch
Bug#329614: -o relative-file puts it inside the build directory, which gets
deleted
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 05:16:24AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> Package: linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686
> Severity: minor
> Version: 2.6.12-6
>
> A module collection that just uses:
> @$(MAKE) -C $(KERNEL_SOURCES) SUBDIRS=$(shell pwd) modules_install
> to install its kernel modules will try to p
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 06:55:19PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> [Restored the original Cc list, please keep the @bugs.debian.org]
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:43:52PM +0200, Guillaume Delacour wrote:
> > I tryed with a 2.6.11.9 kernel, but i run debian stable, and i really
> > want to run debi
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:14:45AM -0500, Zach Lowry wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: important
> File: kernel-image-2.6.8-2
>
> Hello!
>
> On the 2.6.8-2 kernel-tree, apparently there were a number of NFSv3
> problems introduced which Linux later fix
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:35:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:57:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:53:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:36:01PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > > Ok, looks like people seem to want pyt
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:07:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:28:01AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to not
> > have it require any further backports.
>
> As discussed on irc, this is useless non-sense.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:32:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 04:17:58PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:26:02PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Matthew Wilcox has advised me on IRC that #329888 (FTBS on hppa)
> > > is in fact a kernel pr
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 05:29:28PM +0100, Steve Homer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just recompiled kernel 2.6.8 to move siimage to a module and remove the
> initrd functionality.
>
> Everything works fine except for sshd which now is bouncing connects just
> responding with a "connection closed" error.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 03:58:31PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:58:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 07:02:57PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I attended a product briefing at Computer Associates on Thursday, and one
> > >
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:06:52PM +0200, Sébastien Platel wrote:
> I have the same problem trying to compile some modules from
> linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686, here is my final output:
>
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686'
> scripts/Makefile.build:13: scripts/basic/M
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:15:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:58:45AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Joey, what are the estimated schedule for a release ?
> >
> > I don't know. Why does the powerpc image build fail with E: Couldn't
> > find packag
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:58:45AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Joey, what are the estimated schedule for a release ?
>
> I don't know. Why does the powerpc image build fail with E: Couldn't
> find package firewire-core-modules-2.6.12-1-powerpc-miboot-di, since
> linux-kernel-
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-9_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-9_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kern
linux-2.6_2.6.12-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.12-9.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.12-9.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-9_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-9_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-9_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-9_all.deb
Sven Luther wrote:
> Joey, what are the estimated schedule for a release ?
I don't know. Why does the powerpc image build fail with E: Couldn't
find package firewire-core-modules-2.6.12-1-powerpc-miboot-di, since
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 only provides
nic-extra-modules-2.6.12-1-powerpc-miboot-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 330003 bzip2 1.0.2-8.1
Bug#330003: kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27-11
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.4.27' to `bzip2'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
reassign 330003 bzip2 1.0.2-8.1
thanks
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:51:11PM -0700, Fenrir wrote:
> Hm... how odd, never had the problem with the kernel packages before, but
> that fixed it. Thanks for all the time, and sorry for the trouble.
Yeah, that tells me it's not a bug in the kernel package,
53 matches
Mail list logo
