Hello,
I think it should be time we did a 2.6.12-7 upload, with all the fixes that
those bring in, especially the powerpc64 nvidiafb disabling one, before we do
2.6.13-1.
Not so sure about the 2.6.13-1 status, it should work just fine with yaird (i
am using it here now), and i was really impress
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 07:50:38AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:53:30AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > If the kernel team would really like to handle issues like detecting
> > whether an i386 machine running a UP kernel is SMP, I'd be very happy
> > for the code for t
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:34:30AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 09:21:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 07:49:06PM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> > > the culprit was CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA, which should not be set. the following
> > > changes fix the boot on Power
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Horms wrote:
I just took a quick glance, and that patch does seem
to be in Linus's Git Tree, and possibly a release.
I'll poke further, but thats probably reason enough
to put it into the Debian kernels. Well, that and
it solving your problem.
Jurij, any objections, this is
I just took a quick glance, and that patch does seem
to be in Linus's Git Tree, and possibly a release.
I'll poke further, but thats probably reason enough
to put it into the Debian kernels. Well, that and
it solving your problem.
Jurij, any objections, this is pretty much your corner of the feild
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 328784 kernel-package
Bug#328784: Give warnings during preconfigure, not during install
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6-686' to `kernel-package'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 04:36:41PM -0500, Mike Hicks wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
>
> Hi.
>
> I got snippy at the maintainer of udev earlier today because I didn't
> see any kernel-image-2.6.12-* packages in my friendly neighborhood
> Debian repository or on any other one I could find, yet current
reassign 328784 kernel-package
thanks
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:23:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 02:45:40PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> > Version: 2.6.12-6
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > When installing/upgrading a lot of packages, it is
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:48:01PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
> Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > If the problem lies in another package, would you be so kind as to
> > > refile it for me?
>
> > reassign 328685 linux-2.6
>
> Marco, gracie mille.
Here is the text of the bug in case
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 09:21:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 07:49:06PM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> > the culprit was CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA, which should not be set. the following
> > changes fix the boot on PowerMac 7,2, and add support for the soundcard.
>
> Thanks very mu
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andres Salomon:
>
> > How can you tell? The mitre description is absolutely useless. I
> > fucking hate this stupid vendor-sec/mitre non-disclosure policy,
>
> In most cases, MITRE does not have access to pre-disclosure
> infor
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 10:11:04AM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
> Version: 2.6.11-4
> Severity: normal
>
>
> UDEV requires a kernel version >= 2.6.12, however the amd64 kernel
> provided in debian/i386 is at most 2.6.11. Could you package a newer
> version
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:53:30AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> If the kernel team would really like to handle issues like detecting
> whether an i386 machine running a UP kernel is SMP, I'd be very happy
> for the code for that to move there. However, I don't think the 1:1
> subarch mapping you de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322734 + patch
Bug#322734: linux-image-2.6.12-1-sparc64: oops while loading sungem(?) on sun
blade 100
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
tags 322734 + patch
quit
The patch appears to fix the problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:36 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:34:22PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:24 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:25:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Alright, I think I'm a f
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:24 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:25:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
> >
> > Alright, I think I'm a fan of #2. The module maintainers upload their
> > packages to sid, with the binary package -source in there. We
> > have a package called
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:34:22PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:24 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:25:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> [...]
> > >
> > > Alright, I think I'm a fan of #2. The module maintainers upload their
> > > packages to s
I haven't tested this.
diff -ur linux-2.6.13/drivers/net/sungem.c linux-2.6.13.2/drivers/net/sungem.c
--- linux-2.6.13/drivers/net/sungem.c 2005-08-28 19:41:01.0 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.13.2/drivers/net/sungem.c 2005-09-16 21:02:12.0 -0400
@@ -2816,7 +2816,7 @@
#if (!defined(__spa
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
Version: 2.4.27-10
Followup-For: Bug #315110
Hi,
after some time, I tried to work under kernel 2.6.8 and I don't even get
the module to work.
* dmesg complains the following:
found SMC SuperIO Chip (devid=0x5a rev=00 base=0x004e): LPC47N227
smsc_superio_flat(
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:09:50PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > what happened to the patch producing the small busybox deb
> > that iniramfs-tools needs?
>
> What is the problem with using the udeb?
>
> > did you accept the patch from jeff bail
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:09:50PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> what happened to the patch producing the small busybox deb
> that iniramfs-tools needs?
What is the problem with using the udeb?
> did you accept the patch from jeff bailey?
I don't find a patch or even bugreport in the bts.
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:25:12PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Why do we need klibc for initramfs?
> > small size.
>
> LVM and multipath-tools are not built against klibc and the first don't
> su
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:56:25PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
> Version: 2.6.12-6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I would like CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR to be enabled so that the beagle
> desktop search and indexing daemon is faster. Also, when 2.6.13 is
> uploaded, be sure
24 matches
Mail list logo
