On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:50:58PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> I have committed the patch for this problem to svn. The fix will be
> included into the 2.6.12-7 upload of kernel packages.
I hope you pulled the patch from the git archive.
Bastian
--
"We have the right to survive!"
Package: linux-source-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm not sure the kernel is responsible of this problem, this can be lvm as well.
I've 2.6.12 with lvm over a software raid1.
All the filesystems are xfs.
The architecture is X86_64 on an athlon 64 3500+. The system has been crea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 328534 pending
Bug#328534: Kernel panic on Adaptec 2100S on boot
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
tags 328534 pending
thanks
Hi,
I have committed the patch for this problem to svn. The fix will be
included into the 2.6.12-7 upload of kernel packages.
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ Key
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not really a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Steve has confirmed that this bug is still present in 2.6.12-6.
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in current kernel packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The kernel fails to compile with the following error:
/usr/bin/make CFLAGS="-D__KERNEL__
-I/home/marlow/src/kernel/kernel-source-2.4.27/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 319986 323724
Bug#319986: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64 fails on dual G5 PowerMac7,3
Bug#323724: [powerpc] linux-image-2.6.12.1-powerpc64: does not boot on
PowerMac7,2
Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac
merge 319986 323724
thanks
Hi.
Just a short note to confirm that recompiling with the default
configuration file arch/ppc64/defconfig, i could boot this kernel.
I also added support for sound, the modified defconfig is attached.
I used this command to compile linux-source-2.6.12 2.6.12-6:
make-
Want to find somebody to have se-x with right now?
Find a female (or male) friend that just wants to f-uck!
There are also a few who want a serious relationship though
So if you want a long-termer, or a one-nighter, you got it ;)
Whatever floats your boat pretty much!
http://www.achucklehead.com
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If the problem lies in another package, would you be so kind as to
> > refile it for me?
> reassign 328685 linux-2.6
Marco, gracie mille.
--
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FA
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 328685 linux-2.6
Bug#328685: udev: main: action, subsystem or devpath missing
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 09:07 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:00:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > I have done a second build, with the following changes, as
> > > 2.6.12-5.99.sarge2
> > > Only the first change is relevant, URL as immediately above :)
> > >
> > >* Change ker
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 10:55 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:30:33PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> >
> > dann frazier writes...
> >
> > > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:19 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > I'm thinging that if the use of the BTS is really to allow
> > > > users to track all pr
* Andres Salomon:
> How can you tell? The mitre description is absolutely useless. I
> fucking hate this stupid vendor-sec/mitre non-disclosure policy,
In most cases, MITRE does not have access to pre-disclosure
information. They just hand out unique names, and update the database
based on pub
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:28:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line problem found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
kernel: 2.6.12
Hello,
module ohci_hcd fails with message "USB HC TakeOver failed!".
Reason is the section in ohci-hcd.c with the switch #define IR_DISABLE.
With defined IR_DISABLE, ohci_hcd runs without error.
CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP does not seems the right switch for the machine.
The machine has no I
Accepted:
mkvmlinuz_14.dsc
to pool/main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_14.dsc
mkvmlinuz_14.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_14.tar.gz
mkvmlinuz_14_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_14_powerpc.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for your contributi
mkvmlinuz_14_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mkvmlinuz_14.dsc
mkvmlinuz_14.tar.gz
mkvmlinuz_14_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:38:21AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Out of interest, what is a good way to check dependancies across all
> architectures and distributions? I know that apt-cache can do this based on
> the sources it knows about, but thats usually only for the current
> arch and distro.
I use
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:06:56AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:23:08PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 08:02:05AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 11:06:38AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:54:19PM +0200, Sven
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:29:20PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 11:03 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Now that 2.6.12 is finally in testing and work is well underway to
> > > remove 2.6.8, I think we can switch to tracking security holes in the
>
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:23:08PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 08:02:05AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 11:06:38AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:54:19PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > the /etc/kernel/postinst.d script, provided by
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:32:30PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Franz subsequently mentioned to me that the transition to 2.6.12 seems
> to be going well, now those kernels have finally made it into testing.
> So hopefully we can get rid of 2.6.8 sooner rather than later.
>
> If there are other issues, a
25 matches
Mail list logo
