On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 02:18:07AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Aug 22 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:23:39AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > > So, I do think that it would be possible to get it smaller. Want to
> > > see my .config? I just posted it to linux-kernel in
On Aug 22 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:23:39AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > So, I do think that it would be possible to get it smaller. Want to
> > see my .config? I just posted it to linux-kernel in a reply to
> > Andrew Morton.
>
> Remember the debian kernel is generi
At Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:54:13 +0900,
Horms wrote:
> > So the dependency isn't on e2fsprogs, per-se, but rather that
> > e2fsprogs's initrd script has to filter out the linux-gate.so.1 entry,
> > but if you have a newer than a certain glibc, it is incompatible with
> > e2fsprogs 1.35-2, and you need
* dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 11:58 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > 2.4.27 is building.
>
> And done:
> http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel/sparc/2.4.27
Works fine on my sparc64.
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:31:37PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:48:53AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:47:14PM -0700, Tony Godshall wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Looks like building the initrd required an upgraded
> > > Depends: directly or ind
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:48:53AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:47:14PM -0700, Tony Godshall wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Looks like building the initrd required an upgraded
> > Depends: directly or indirectly to e2fsprogs.
> >
> > Not sure the minimum version required, but I h
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:47:42PM +0200, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:50:20 +0900
> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Its an issue with the kernel. 2.6.10 does not compile cleanly
> > with gcc-4.0. 2.6.10 is being debricated and is no longer supported,
> > please cons
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:47:14PM -0700, Tony Godshall wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Looks like building the initrd required an upgraded
> Depends: directly or indirectly to e2fsprogs.
>
> Not sure the minimum version required, but I had
> 1.35-6 when installing linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 failed
> and 1.38
tags 324591 +pending
thanks
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:29:56PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Severity: serious
> Version: 2.4.27-11
>
> >From my build log (reproduced using pbuilder in an i386 chroot):
>
> ...
> make[5]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/kernel-so
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 11:58 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 15:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 14:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:21 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 09:30 +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wro
Hi.
Looks like building the initrd required an upgraded
Depends: directly or indirectly to e2fsprogs.
Not sure the minimum version required, but I had
1.35-6 when installing linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 failed
and 1.38-1.1 when installing linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
succeeded.
Best Regards,
Tony
Package: kernel
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: important
Hi,
I was installing a package with dpkg when the kernel had a GPF. dpkg
was then stuck and I had to reboot the system. This is with the
Debian provided linux-image:
$ uname -a
Linux jophur 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 #1 Thu Aug 18 03:05:27 CEST 200
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Severity: serious
Version: 2.4.27-11
>From my build log (reproduced using pbuilder in an i386 chroot):
...
make[5]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/kernel-source-2.4.27-2.4.27/scripts'
gcc-3.3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -c -o docproc.o
docpro
Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: important
Somehow the @upstream@ and @version@ macros didn't get expanded in
debian/bin/unpatch and debian/bin/apply which causes
PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES make-kpkg cleab
to fail with the following message:
/usr/bin/make -f /usr/shar
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:23:39AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Aug 22 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > A bit of reality check here, we have around 1.3MB space on the miboot
> > floppies, and current compressed miboot floppies arer 1.6MB or so, so
> > we just need to unbloat it further 200/300kb (c
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:50:20 +0900
Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its an issue with the kernel. 2.6.10 does not compile cleanly
> with gcc-4.0. 2.6.10 is being debricated and is no longer supported,
> please consider using 2.6.12 or later. If you really need to
> compile 2.6.10 for some reas
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: important
sena:~# apt-get -V install linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Suggested packages:
lilo (22.6.1-6.2)
The following NEW packages will be installed:
linux-image-2.6.12-1
Quoting Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No, I do not believe so.
> but it is documented in run-parts(8). Perhaps this
> should be reflected in mknitrd(8). Do you want
I tried to fix that, see attached patch.
--
Simon
173c173,175
< Scripts in this directory are run just before the image is generated
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 15:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 14:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:21 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 09:30 +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > > * Horms wrote:
> > > > > 2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stab
Here in the University other machines with the same NIC, have
the same problems with newer kernels.
I have tried using netperf to see if the NIC stops to send or receive
network traffic, but it worked without problems for 12 hours in each test.
The best I can do to reproduce the problem is: In o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Horms,
> Thanks as always.
Thanks to you for the quick reply!
> I have added [X] to SVN.
> - In the linux-2.6 directory in trunk
> *This should appear in linux-2.6 2.6.12-6 in unstable.
Noted.
> - In the linux-2.6-devel (perhaps renamed linux-2
Package: linux-source-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-100-amd64-k8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECT
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc
Version: 2.4.27-9
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
* Change default ramdisk size for sparc to 16,384K to accomodate a fatter
d-i initrd for netboot installs.
(Joshua Kwan)
This change has been made for the 2.6 kernel, but 2.4 is still using the old
8 mb i
On Aug 22 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> A bit of reality check here, we have around 1.3MB space on the miboot
> floppies, and current compressed miboot floppies arer 1.6MB or so, so
> we just need to unbloat it further 200/300kb (compressed though),
> which should be possible by modularizing lot of st
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:56:09PM +0530, Rachita Kothiyal wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> As Vivek discussed with you in OLS regarding saving dump images
> from initrd, I have come up with an initial patch to mkinitrd on
> Debian unstable. This modifies the mkinitrd script to generate a
> custom initrd
2005-08-21, v keltezéssel 12.12-kor maximilian attems ezt írta:
> urrgs, but that seem to match upstream bugs thread.
I don't know whether I should be happy about this..
> could you try out that bios workaround:
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0403.1/1537.html
I can test it on tues
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 03:19:05PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Alright folks, I think the packaging is ready to be beaten on by people.
> > So, unless anyone has any concerns/problems/etc, I'm going to assume
> > everything's a go for uploading 2.6.12.
> >
> > The curr
I'm getting really confused.
I can't install anything but Vanilla kernel 2.2.20 because 3.0ra5 and 3.1
hand during install on my advancesys scsi card.
And i want to run a raid drive, mdadm keeps telling me it needs ver 0.9 of
summat.
So i got the file kernel-patch-2.2.20-raid_4_all.deb.
i was
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:58:51PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:24:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > General problems:
> > > - The 2.6 (instead of 2.6.12 etc.) versioning means previous versions
> > > are thrown out of the archive, anything which isn't ready until t
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:59:51AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ok, this is a mess, so we probably need to hold a little flamewar about how we
> want the tree organized or something, before we start moving stuff back and
> fort.
>
> I believe that the trunk is for main development, and it is import
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:24:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > General problems:
> > - The 2.6 (instead of 2.6.12 etc.) versioning means previous versions
> > are thrown out of the archive, anything which isn't ready until then
> > will lose support.
> > It is IMHO not realistic to expect t
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:24:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:59:51AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, this is a mess, so we probably need to hold a little flamewar about how
> > we
> > want the tree organized or something, before we start moving stuff back and
>
On Aug 22, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was under the impression that /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/build/
> was used rather than /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/source/
>
> Is this incorrect?
No, you are right.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Maybe give a _warning_ (rather than an error) if "$rootdev = 0" but
this is not great for the case that $rootdev should be zero (see bug
#310316). Alternativly we could wait untill after the call to
mount_root (or whatever it is) and check that a root filesystem has
been mounted on /mnt. Something
34 matches
Mail list logo
