On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:56:54AM -0500, Micah wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hey all,
>
> CAN-2005-2555[1] reads:
>
> Linux kernel 2.6.x does not properly restrict socket policy access to
> users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability, which could allow local users
Horms wrote:
> Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> > There is a symbolic link at /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source
> > which points to someone's home directory (horms). The horms
> > home directory does not exist on a new installation.
> >
> > This is in the stable (Sarge) release.
>
> Thanks, I'll take a look
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:47:16PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Aug 20 2005, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > Keep in mind that the *next* kernel will be even bigger. Sooner or
> > later, even the fully modularized minimum configuration isn't going
> > fit on a single floppy.
>
> There is current discu
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:27:50PM +0100, Alex Owen wrote:
> tag 283919 - fixed
> tag 283919 - pending
> thanks
>
> This proposed patch (or somthing verry simmilar) was applied to
> initrd-tools shortly before the sarge release. However the application
> of the "fix" caused a release critical bug.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:50:32AM -0700, Keith Schweikhard wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to build a 2.6.11 kernel with I2C options enabled. I started the
> build process using the configuration file I had for my 2.6.10 kernel. I
> added the following I2C flags to the existing kernel configurat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After searching through the debian-kernel list archive, this report
appears to be a duplicate of #323702. I won't merge them as the
debian-kernel team may prefer to do that themselves based on their
judgement. For those who need a fix for this issue
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:22:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Thanks, I'll take a look into fixing it and get it in the
> >next Sarge update. Incidently, that link isn't used for anything
> >much, so it shouldn't do much harm.
> Anything except every half-decent out
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 07:56:13PM +0200, Simon Schoar wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.81.1
> Severity: normal
>
> Files with "." (a.a/a.sh) in their names in /etc/mkinitrd/scripts are ignored
> my mkinitrd.
>
> Is this documented anywhere ?
No, I do not believe so.
I did a quick
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:26:13PM +0200, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
> Version: 2.6.10-6
> Severity: important
>
> I cannot build the kernel 2.6.10 with gcc 4.0.1-3 and
> linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1_i386.deb.
>
> I have the following error:
>
> In file incl
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Stromek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering why every kernel-image-2.6 meta-package in testing is dependent
> on 2.6.8 and not on 2.6.11 kernel package.
We are in the process of fixing that, but taking a bit longer than
expected because of wanting to change t
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: normal
There is not much value in shipping kernel images supporting
a CPU no longer supported by Debian since Debian 3.1 .
Renaming the kernel image and letting the compiler optimize it
for the 486 would also give your 486 and 586 use
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 21 August 2005 03:56, Horms wrote:
> > I've put the following in SVN, so this
> > should be resolved in the next release.
>
> I noticed on IRC that you put a "closes: #322723" in the changelog.
> I'm wondering if that is correc
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-6
Severity: important
I cannot build the kernel 2.6.10 with gcc 4.0.1-3 and
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1_i386.deb.
I have the following error:
In file included from drivers/video/fbmem.c:48:
include/linux/fb.h:860: error: array type has inco
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.81.1
Severity: normal
Files with "." (a.a/a.sh) in their names in /etc/mkinitrd/scripts are ignored
my mkinitrd.
Is this documented anywhere ?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
CAN-2005-2555[1] reads:
Linux kernel 2.6.x does not properly restrict socket policy access to
users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability, which could allow local users
to conduct unauthorized activities via (1) ipv4/ip_sockglue.c and (2)
ipv6/
Hi,
I'm wondering why every kernel-image-2.6 meta-package in testing is dependent
on 2.6.8 and not on 2.6.11 kernel package.
I have also found that there is no 2.6.11 kernel-source package in
testing. Haven't been 2.6.11 fully accepted into testing yet? There is 2.6.11 in
unstable.
Thanks for a
tag 283919 - fixed
tag 283919 - pending
thanks
This proposed patch (or somthing verry simmilar) was applied to
initrd-tools shortly before the sarge release. However the application
of the "fix" caused a release critical bug... #310316 which caused the
patch to be reverted. That is why I'm now rem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 283919 - fixed
Bug#283919: initrd-tools: Should warn if root device is not found
Tags were: fixed pending
Tags removed: fixed
> tag 283919 - pending
Bug#283919: initrd-tools: Should warn if root device is not found
Tags were: pending
Tags removed:
Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: minor
In previous versions of *-doc-2.6.*, the README.Debian file
contained the same information as the README.Debian.1st file in
corresponding *-image-2.6.* packages. In linux-doc-2.6.12, the file
now holds a licence text similar to the copyri
No this wishlist bug has not been fixed... The original reasoning in
the original bug report still stands...
The full story is that the #307471 wishlist patch was applied at the
same time as the wishlist patch for bug #283919 during the sarge
Freeze in the final few weeks before release. The patch
On Sunday 21 August 2005 03:56, Horms wrote:
> I've put the following in SVN, so this
> should be resolved in the next release.
I noticed on IRC that you put a "closes: #322723" in the changelog.
I'm wondering if that is correct as I would say there still is a bad bug
in gcc-4.0 causing the kerne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Thanks, I'll take a look into fixing it and get it in the
>next Sarge update. Incidently, that link isn't used for anything
>much, so it shouldn't do much harm.
Anything except every half-decent out of tree driver...
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Csillag Kristof wrote:
> 2005-08-12, p keltezéssel 10.50-kor Maximilian Attems ezt írta:
> > this seems to be a known upstream bug:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4773
> >
> > unfortunately i don't see a resolution yet.
> > could you test latest -rc6 from linu
Hello,
I am trying to build a 2.6.11 kernel with I2C options enabled. I started the
build process using the configuration file I had for my 2.6.10 kernel. I
added the following I2C flags to the existing kernel configuration:
I2C Support
I2C Device Interfaces
Intel 801
ACPI is selected in the
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:33:00AM +0100, Alex Owen wrote:
> tag 307471 - pending
> thanks
>
> 3 months on... time to remove the pending tag!
The code currently looks like this:
if [ $rootdev != 256 ]; then
mount_root
cd mnt
[ $DEVFS ] && mount -nt devfs devfs dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 307471 - pending
Bug#307471: initrd-tools: wish init would not run mount_root if rootdev=255 (ie
nfs root).
Tags were: pending patch
Tags removed: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
tag 307471 - pending
thanks
3 months on... time to remove the pending tag!
Alex Owen
27 matches
Mail list logo
