Package: kernel
Tags: patch
After switching from a 2.4.27 to 2.6.8 kernel for an old desktop Iuse as
a server, I noticed the following messages on console and kern.log.
Note: the errors are not harmful, just ugly; the system boots normally.
kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.6.8-2-686
kernel:
Maximilian Attems wrote:
> as this seems the same machine concerned by another bug.
> did you try newer 2.6.12 from unstable?
yes, no change and same problems.
I'm also testing the current development git-kernel snapshots with still
no change.
Follow this thread I've started on the kernel-dev list
Maximilian Attems wrote:
> the kernelversion of the dmesg you posted and the initial bugreport
> are different. the dmesg seems to be selfcompiled.
Oh that can be but it's the same problem with a selfcompiled kernel and
a debian kernel.
> did you try latest 2.6.12 from unstable?
> did it help?
y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 284213 -1
Bug#284213: system noise when using ACPI module processor
Bug 284213 cloned as bug 320366.
> reassign -1 kernel-source-2.6.11
Bug#320366: system noise when using ACPI module processor
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.8' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 320053 !
Bug#320053: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686: Installing it with sarge leads to failing
at booting next time
Bug#287411: 2.4/2.6 kernel oops on load of i810_audio in hp pavilion ze4900
laptop
Bug#298623: kernel oops on load of i810_audio in gat
owner 320053 !
thanks
On Thursday 28 July 2005 08:48, Horms wrote:
> > i don't see why this bug is related to me...
> > another developer just mailed me and showed me this bugreport:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298623
> >
> > and this is exactly my problem g
>
> Yes, I thi
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:49:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>> I tend to aggree, though I believe Franz Pop, or perhaps some of the
>> other d-i team members have reason for keeping these images separate.
>> Perhaps they could reiterate them here.
>
> Mostly
reassign 319546 kernel-image-2.6.12-i386
thanks
On Jul 23, Paolo Alexis Falcone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using the stock Debian 2.6.12-1-686-smp kernel, the upload firmware
> sequence for the isl3890 (as used by the prism54 module) fails when
> udev 0.063-1 is installed. The firmware loads n
More info. I have a couple of other kernels that I tend to forget because
they break my sound config. One is a custom build with IDE DMA and
realtime-lsm support, and more interestingly the other is a stock Debian
2.6.8-2-k7. I realized sometime in the middle of the night that looking
at the loa
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:49:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> I tend to aggree, though I believe Franz Pop, or perhaps some of the
> other d-i team members have reason for keeping these images separate.
> Perhaps they could reiterate them here.
Mostly two reasons:
- Changes in the d-i packages don't tr
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The problem is that the DAK will update linux-2.6, kernel-tree-x.y.z-n
> and kernel-image packages without any regards to linux-kernel-di. They
> will become out of sync and end up without source -> GPL violation.
Last I check
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: critical
In sarge I was unable to take any lvm snapshots until I manually
loaded the dm-snapshot kernel module with modprobe.
I took a snapshot of my /usr filesystem, but didn't remove the
snapshot with lvremove before rebooting.
Afte
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:05:25AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Well all I know is "tell upstream that 2.6 proc_usb_info.txt needs
> those blank lines if they aren't there already"... as I am unfamiliar
> with upstream.
I took a closer look at your patch, and to be honest, other than the
last thre
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Horms wrote:
> And I do wonder if this script should be on the initrd image at all.
> Could you poke around for difference between your working initrd
> image for kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386 and the broken one for
> kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386?
There are some--probably best I just
reassign 298623 kernel-source-2.6.8
reassign 320053 kernel-source-2.6.8
severity 320053 normal
merge 298623 320053
thanks
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:40:59PM +0200, stefan wrote:
> hi thx for your answer...
>
> i don't see why this bug is related to me...
> another developer just mailed me and sho
I tried to build this kernel on a newer PIV. This dos *not* build with
gcc 4.0 or gcc 3.4, but *does* build with gcc 3.3
I'll try this on the target machine, and let you know.
--
Emmanuel Charpentier[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 06:07:06PM -0500, Chris Howie wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686
> Version: 2.6.11-7
> Followup-For: Bug #312973
>
> I tested with 2.6.12, and it still drifts. There appears to be no difference
> in how the drift amount is "selected" on boot; sometimes it drifts a
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:08:53AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 18:29 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:45:20AM +0200, David MartÃnez Moreno wrote:
> > > El Martes, 26 de Julio de 2005 05:20, Drew Parsons escribió:
> > > > Intel video driver (855GM etc) suppor
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We seem to be running around in circles here. If an image package
> > depends on kernel-tree-x.y.z-N, then kernel-source-x.y.z can be
> > updated and the image can still be rebuilt, verb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 298623 kernel-source-2.6.8
Bug#298623: kernel oops on load of i810_audio in gateway 7320GZ laptop
Bug#287411: 2.4/2.6 kernel oops on load of i810_audio in hp pavilion ze4900
laptop
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `kernel-source-2.6.8'.
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319657: fixed in kernel-package 9.004
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
21 matches
Mail list logo
