On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:04:07AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:17:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Andres Salomon wrote:
> >> > [snip]
> >> >> > It is IM
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your patch. I'm not sure that documentation patches
are appropriate for 2.6.8 which is really just in maintenence mode.
Actually, I'm not sure if anything other than security
fixes will ever make it into the 2.6.8 for sarge.
Do you know which upstream version this was included
Package: kernel
Severity: important
"Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
[http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/07/msg00304.html]:
Sven> Oh, darn, thsis means something is broken. or something
Sven> else,, please can you comment on a real bugreporty
Sven> (
Intel video driver (855GM etc) support is broken in Debian
(linux-tree-2.6 v2.6.12-1, xserver-xorg v6.8.2.dfsg.1-4) at the moment.
That's the i810 Xserver driver using the i915 kernel drm module.
After a suspend/resume cycle, any OpenGL programs fail, e.g.
$ glxgears
intelWaitIrq: drmI830IrqWait
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:52:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 12:45:48AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:51:22PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
>
> > for this P120 (whatever) i have *shudder* had to use a
> > 2.2.10-compact-pci ke
Package: kernel-doc-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-10
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-2.6.8/Documentation/usb/proc_usb_info.txt.gz
Tags: upstream patch
Please forward to upstream maintainer.
Added blank lines to reflect current format.
Nobody can read that jumble without them.
Removed traili
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
hi jurij,
i invite you to think ahead to when the 2.4 kernel is no longer
maintained.
i invite you to consider where debian will stand at that time with
respect to older hardware.
should debian be possible to install on older hardw
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 12:45:48AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:51:22PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> for this P120 (whatever) i have *shudder* had to use a
> 2.2.10-compact-pci kernel.
> there exists a kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4 (which i might try at s
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:06:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Incidentally, I have no idea why this bug was filed against
> kernel-image-2.6-686;
... because i believed it to be a... wossisname... dummy package
(2.6.N ... 2.6.NN)
oops.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:51:22PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes...
> > i invite you to think ahead to when the 2.4 kernel is no longer
> > maintained.
> > i invite you to consider where debian will stand at that time with
> > respect to older hardware.
> > sho
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:03:48PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Luke,
>
> Sorry for the previous terse replies to your bug reports #319878 and #319823.
> The debian-kernel team gets a lot of email/bugs and sometimes is quick to
> response/close bugs without a lot of explanation.
*sigh* yeh i k
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:51:22PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> It would probably be a good idea to record what ought to work in any given
> release and maybe have an ongoing idea what it should be. The answer might be
> architecture specific? ISTR either the d-i team or apt/dpkg/aptitude tryin
debian-release cc'd due to minimum system requirement stuff mentioned in a
previous message...
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes...
> my bug report invites you to consider the impact that such
> a policy decision "roll your own or install 2.4 on anything
> with <= 48mb of ram", made by mr h
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 04:17:10PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> debian-release cc'd due to minimum system requirement stuff mentioned in a
> previous message...
>
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes...
>
> > my bug report invites you to consider the impact that such
> > a policy decision "ro
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes...
> i invite you to think ahead to when the 2.4 kernel is no longer
> maintained.
>
> i invite you to consider where debian will stand at that time with
> respect to older hardware.
>
> should debian be possible to install on older hardware in two,
> three y
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:56:21AM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimar?es wrote:
> ** Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ::
>
> > telling people to "roll their own" kernel (mr horms) isn't an
> > acceptable option, either. i may be able to do that (mr horms)
> > but other people won't be able to.
> >
> > you
hi jurij,
i invite you to think ahead to when the 2.4 kernel is no longer
maintained.
i invite you to consider where debian will stand at that time with
respect to older hardware.
should debian be possible to install on older hardware in two,
three years time, or should people who are not as for
Jurij Smakov writes...
> Honestly, it's a volunteer project and if you want support for something
> that's not there, the best way is just to roll up your sleeves. Flaming
> people will never get you anywhere.
"Our priorities are our users and free software"
The user's original bug report was
Luke,
Sorry for the previous terse replies to your bug reports #319878 and #319823.
The debian-kernel team gets a lot of email/bugs and sometimes is quick to
response/close bugs without a lot of explanation.
I think what horms was trying to say was that your bug report listed 2.6.5 as
the kern
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> merge 319823 319878
Bug#319823: kernel-image-2.6-686: 2.6 debian kernels do not install on m/cs
with <= 48mb RAM!!!
Bug#319878: kernel-image-2.6-686: the entire range of 2.6 debian k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> submitter 319823 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319823: kernel-image-2.6-686: 2.6 debian kernels do not install on m/cs
with <= 48mb RAM!!!
Changed Bug submitter from merge to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reopen 319823 merge
Bug#319823: kernel-image-2.6-686: 2.6 debian kernels do not install on m/cs
with <= 48mb RAM!!!
Bug reopened, originator set to merge.
>
End of message, stopping
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
telling people to "roll their own" kernel (mr horms) isn't an
acceptable option, either. i may be able to do that (mr horms)
but other people won't be able to.
you going (mr horms) to tell me and people like me that i
should throw away p
Identical to the brandname drugs, low prices, international shipping.
http://socialist.vaiium.com/ph/dir/
No one in the world needs a mink coat but a mink.
Anger is a bad counselor.
Custom is the great guide of human life.
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Severity: important
All the linux-image-2.6.12-1-* packages don't have a "Depends:" header
in their package control file, which may be fatal if someone uses
debfoster and deinstalls initrd-tools after installing this kernel.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Alberto Maurizi wrote:
Thank you for you suggestions, but I already have
build-essential and libc6-dev packages in my system (see below).
Let me know I I can help with this bug.
Regards,
Alberto
Then please check that the files rep
** Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ::
> telling people to "roll their own" kernel (mr horms) isn't an
> acceptable option, either. i may be able to do that (mr horms)
> but other people won't be able to.
>
> you going (mr horms) to tell me and people like me that i
> should throw away perfectly goo
Package: kernel-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.5-2
Severity: normal
not one single one of the 2.6 kernels - 2.6.5, 2.6.6, 2.6.7, 2.6.8,
2.6.9, 2.6.10, 2.6.11 nor 2.6.12 - can be installed on a system with
less than 48mb of RAM - because of the hungry memory requirements
of the initial ram disk.
righ
Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To test whether the problems you are
> experiencing are due to the wrong MCLK value, you can try setting it
> by adding a kernel boot argument
>
> video=atyfb:mclk=100
The framebuffer output is similar, just in bigger characters (fewer
lines per screen).
tag 319457 +wontfix
thanks
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:38:47AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: important
>
>
> hi
>
> I just bought a DVD Burner; I wanted to burn stuff, so I loaded
> ide-scsi (since this was the way to go some years ago
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 319457 +wontfix
Bug#319457: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7: DVD Burning with ide-scsi : oops the
kernel, hangs ide-scsi
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
tag 319629 +patch
thanks
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:42:24AM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-10
> Severity: normal
> Tags: security
>
> http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1768 reads:
>
> Race condition in the ia32 compatibilit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 319629 +patch
Bug#319629: [CAN-2005-1768]: Race condition in ia32 compatability code for
execve causes local DoS
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:59:03 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319823: kernel-image-2.6-686: 2.6 debian kernels do not
install on m/cs with <= 48mb RAM!!!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
34 matches
Mail list logo
