Bug#319657: Cloning, reassigning to kernel-package, tagging pending

2005-07-23 Thread Jurij Smakov
clone 319657 -1 reassign -1 kernel-package tags -1 pending tags 319657 pending thanks Hi, This is bug in kernel-package, maintainer is aware of the problem and will upload a fixed version (9.004) as soon as the ftp-master is functional again (Monday, at the latest). We'll have to re-upload the

Processed: Cloning, reassigning to kernel-package, tagging pending

2005-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 319657 -1 Bug#319657: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: /vmlinuz and /initrd symlinks were botched after installing 2.6.12 Bug 319657 cloned as bug 319664. > reassign -1 kernel-package Bug#319664: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: /vmlinuz and /initrd symlinks

Bug#319657: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: /vmlinuz and /initrd symlinks were botched after installing 2.6.12

2005-07-23 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 23 July 2005 20:47, Andrew Moise wrote: > After installing linux-image, the automatic run of lilo failed. I > found that that had been because my /vmlinuz symlink pointed to > '/boot/-2.6' and my /initrd.img to '/boot/-2.6'. That should probably be '/boot-2.6' in both cases. At leas

Bug#319657: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: /vmlinuz and /initrd symlinks were botched after installing 2.6.12

2005-07-23 Thread Andrew Moise
Just to be clear, regardless of what it _should_ be, it's definitely not correct on my system: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /vmlinuz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2005-07-23 09:56 /vmlinuz -> /boot/-2.6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /initrd.img lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2005-07-23 09:56 /initrd.img -

Bug#319657: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: /vmlinuz and /initrd symlinks were botched after installing 2.6.12

2005-07-23 Thread Andrew Moise
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 Version: 2.6.12-1 Severity: normal After installing linux-image, the automatic run of lilo failed. I found that that had been because my /vmlinuz symlink pointed to '/boot/-2.6' and my /initrd.img to '/boot/-2.6'. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing

Bug#319646: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp: please include 6PACK module on for -686-smp build

2005-07-23 Thread Juergen Rinas
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp Version: 2.6.12-1 Severity: minor please consider including include the 6PACK driver in the kernel package for -686-smp machines. This driver has been fixed for SMP in kernel version 2.6.12.3 (see changelog.Debian.gz) mni tnx Jürgen -- System Information

Bug#304608: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.11: Continuity errors with TDA10021-based dvb-cards)

2005-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:02:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304608: kernel-source-2.6.11: Continuity errors with TDA10021-based dvb-cards has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Re: Bug#304608: kernel-source-2.6.11: Continuity errors with TDA10021-based dvb-cards

2005-07-23 Thread Heikki Henriksen
> Please apply the attached patch in debians 2.6.11-tree. > It fixes continuity errors, which makes TDA10021-based dvb-cards almost > unusable. The patch is already applied upstream in 2.6.12-rc2, but it > would be great to have it in debians 2.6.11-images. Closing as this is fixed in > 2.6.12, an

Bug#319629: [CAN-2005-1768]: Race condition in ia32 compatability code for execve causes local DoS

2005-07-23 Thread Micah Anderson
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 Version: 2.4.27-10 Severity: normal Tags: security http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1768 reads: Race condition in the ia32 compatibility code for the execve system call in Linux kernel 2.4 before 2.4.31 and 2.6 before 2.6.6 allows local user

Re: Bug#319515: new kernel-package creates ridiculous symlinks in /boot

2005-07-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
tags 319515 unreproducible severity 319515 important thanks Hi, I can't reproduce this problem. Can you send me the kernel image postinst? This could be something that is ppc specific, I think. manoj -- Almost anything derogatory you could say about today's software design w

Re: CRITICAL: Don't remove kernels 2.4.x, anybody upgraded hsflinmodem to 2.6.x?

2005-07-23 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 12:52:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Apparently, according to Francesco P. Lovergine , the latest version of > hsflinmodem (5.03.27) was not free at all, it was a beta. Can anybody > confirm this, since both 5.0327lnxbeta and 5.0327 versions exist... AFAIK they are