Hi Dave,
I've tried to look at the diff between 2.6.8 and 2.6.11/12 atyfb driver,
and it's pretty huge, so I wasn't able to get any useful information that
way. To test whether the problems you are experiencing are due to the
wrong MCLK value, you can try setting it by adding a kernel boot arg
How have you been, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you like watching cable T.V.?
PPV : Sports, Movies, Adult Channels, HBO ,Cinemax,
Starz, OnDemand, Ect. And the best part is you can
have all these channels with our product!
Our website : filtersppv.com
If you don't want this anymore, add /r to the doma
Have you seen the new 2005 digital cable filters?
With new technology it's the only bypass method working on all digital cable
systems.
Stop paying high prices for channels that should be included in your cable bill.
With your remote you will be able to order channels for free such as:
*-Pay-
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:56:01AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:55:42 +0300, Horms wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I need to do something about the fact that users go and
> > grab kernel-source-2.4.27 and it doesn't compile with the
> > default gcc any more. Here are three solutio
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 08:13:41PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:49:12 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> > Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> > Version: 2.6.8-16
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:17:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Andres Salomon wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> > It is IMHO not realistic to expect the rest of the world to wait for
> >> > some obscure subarchitecture.
> >>
> >> Who said we're go
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686-smp
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Nice Day,
I make a normal 'monthly or so' upgrade of a server running sarge.
At upgrade
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> As you all know the hsflinmodem packages are non-free and crippled to
>> 14.4 kbps. Has anybody ported the hsflinmodem-5.03.27 (the latest free
>> versions) to work for kernels 2.6.x?? In case not, the removal of kernels
>> 2.4.x is a very BAD ide
Hi,
after reading other bug reports regarding symptoms with a crazy clock, I
think the behaviour I described is the same as in #284477 and #298301.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284477
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298301
Martin
--
SULFURCELL Solartechni
Hi,
I can reproduce this bug on the ThinkCentres here and will try the
solutions mentioned in this bug report.
Additionally, I read somewhere on debian-user the proposal to disable
X86_UP_IOAPIC and will try this too.
Best regards,
Martin
--
SULFURCELL Solartechnik GmbH
Martin Stigge
Barba
Hi,
I think this is the same problem as described in 284477, maybe you can
try some of the ideas in this bugreport
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284477)...
Martin
--
SULFURCELL Solartechnik GmbH
Martin Stigge
Barbara-McClintock-Str. 11
12489 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andres Salomon wrote:
> [snip]
>> > It is IMHO not realistic to expect the rest of the world to wait for
>> > some obscure subarchitecture.
>>
>> Who said we're going to wait for some obscure subarchitecture? We're
>> going to keep working on kerne
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:03:39 +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>> The bootloader dependencies need to be per flavour. It makes no sense
>> to depend on N bootloaders for an architecture where N-1 are unusable
>> for the specific flavour's kernel image.
>>
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
