On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 12:36:38AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >- The descriptions are wrong for non-i386.
>
> I am not too happy with how the decscription stuff turned out. I think
> that the boilerplate descriptions should be generated only if the cu
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hm, anything I'm forgetting?
- The scripts dir in the linux-headers package must match the flavour.
The problem here is that some architectures (s390, powerpc and mips) are
using two d
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 04:15:39AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> - linux-headers-.*-all is no dummy package.
Bah, this package is not built anyway.
Bastian
--
You can't evaluate a man by logic alone.
-- McCoy, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
Package: kernel
Severity: important
Hello,
working on debian sarge
MB asus p4p800e deluxe
Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller seems to not
work correctly.
For example when I use a usb external DD with mirrordir I get the
following error messages :
,
| mirrordir:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Hm, anything I'm forgetting?
- The scripts dir in the linux-headers package must match the flavour.
- The descriptions are wrong for non-i386.
- Dependencies with arch spec for one-arch packages.
- linux-headers-.*-all is no dummy p
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 04:42:59PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:38:38 +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
>
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> thanks for reply. But is there no *target date* for release?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> MC
> >>
> >>
> > PS: and most important, there will be again suppor
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 09:47:49AM +0300, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 04:49 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Note that one side-effect of dropping the minor number in the source
> > > package name is that we won't be able to have
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:55:42PM +0300, Horms wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Alright folks, I think the packaging is ready to be beaten on by people.
> > So, unless anyone has any concerns/problems/etc, I'm going to assume
> > everything's a go for u
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 317982 kernel-source-2.6.8
Bug#317982: udev: Does not properly add/remove usb disk drives
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `kernel-source-2.6.8'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
reassign 317982 kernel-source-2.6.8
thanks
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 08:14:04PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> reassign 317982 kernel
> thanks
>
> On Jul 16, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > When I use that, the kernel does detect the insertion of the CF card
> > around the moment I plug
* Andres Salomon wrote:
> - there are 3 patches that were in 2.6.11 that have been dropped due to
> lack of interest; sparc, alpha, and powerpc folks should determine
> their value, at some point.
The dropped alpha patch is no longer required with 2.6.12, at least on
my systems the kernel work
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 317982 kernel
Bug#317982: udev: Does not properly add/remove usb disk drives
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `kernel'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
reassign 317982 kernel
thanks
On Jul 16, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I use that, the kernel does detect the insertion of the CF card
> around the moment I plug it in. udev creates the /dev/sda1 properly,
> but I get the following messages from the kernel too:
> usb 1-2: control
Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:53:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Was amd64 support merged in or do we still do a seperate amd64 image
>> package?
>
> Amd64 support is part of this package since the very beginning. :-)
>
> Best rega
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Alright folks, I think the packaging is ready to be beaten on by people.
> So, unless anyone has any concerns/problems/etc, I'm going to assume
> everything's a go for uploading 2.6.12.
Excellent
> The current changes and state of
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:53:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Was amd64 support merged in or do we still do a seperate amd64 image
> package?
Amd64 support is part of this package since the very beginning. :-)
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Descriptio
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alright folks, I think the packaging is ready to be beaten on by people.
> So, unless anyone has any concerns/problems/etc, I'm going to assume
> everything's a go for uploading 2.6.12.
Was amd64 support merged in or do we still do a seperate amd64 im
Alright folks, I think the packaging is ready to be beaten on by people.
So, unless anyone has any concerns/problems/etc, I'm going to assume
everything's a go for uploading 2.6.12.
The current changes and state of the packaging:
- source package is called linux-2.6
- binary image packages ha
"Ci-ialis Softabs" is better than Pfizer Viiagrra
and normal Ci-ialis because:
- Guaaraantees 36 hours lasting
- Safe to take, no side effects at all
- Boost and increase se-xual performance
- Haarder e-rectiions and quick recharge
- Proven and certified by experts and doctors
- only $3.99 per ta
How to save on yo receptionroom ur MEDlCATIONS over 70%.
Phar strath mShop - Successfull and Proven W cancerous ay to save your mo locksmith ney.
authorize V
uneasiness AG
A besmear L
l mustang U
unshaken l
R impartible A undaunted
20 matches
Mail list logo
