On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:29:51PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:08:29AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:15:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:38:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:33 +0900,
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:03:41PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2005, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> >
> >Can I build kernel-headers-2.6.11-1 as an m68k.deb or does that conflict
> >with other arches?
> >Do I need a separate kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-m68k package? m68k is doing
> >fine
Accepted:
kernel-doc-2.6.11_2.6.11-5_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.11/kernel-doc-2.6.11_2.6.11-5_all.deb
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11_2.6.11-5_all.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.11/kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11_2.6.11-5_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-5.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-5.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11_2.6.11-5_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-5_all.deb
kernel-tree-2.6.11_2.6.11-5_all.deb
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Can I build kernel-headers-2.6.11-1 as an m68k.deb or does that conflict
with other arches?
Do I need a separate kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-m68k package? m68k is doing
fine without any 2.6 kernel headers so far, the buildds use a generic k-h
package.
I
Package: kernel-build-2.6.11-powerpc
Version: 2.6.11-2
Severity: important
kernel-build-2.6.11-powerpc 2.6.11-2 conflicts with
kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc 2.6.11-1:
Unpacking kernel-build-2.6.11-powerpc (from
.../kernel-build-2.6.11-powerpc_2.6.11-2_powerpc.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/c
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 04:19:00PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> Then why is CONFIG_PREEMPT disabled in 2.6.11 ? The real problem is
> preempt is enabled.
Because it doesn't provide much benefits while letting broken code
explode. That doesn't mean you should file such reports against against
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:00:41PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:33:42PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
> > Version: 2.6.8-13
> > Severity: important
> >
> > I got the following oops today on a machine with openafs-modules-1.
Your message dated Mon, 16 May 2005 23:00:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309378: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: CONFIG_PREEMPT is
set, and seems to cause oop'es with openafs.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:33:42PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
> Version: 2.6.8-13
> Severity: important
>
> I got the following oops today on a machine with openafs-modules-1.3.81:
>
> afs_put_inode: ino 6501078 (0xf68cdc00) has count 2
> afs_put_inode:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: important
I got the following oops today on a machine with openafs-modules-1.3.81:
afs_put_inode: ino 6501078 (0xf68cdc00) has count 2
afs_put_inode: ino 6432306 (0xf6818400) has count 2
afs_put_inode: ino 6501042 (0xf6f0fc00) has
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:08:21PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:52:19PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> >
> > I have a couple of questions regarding kernel-headers. The 2.6 packages for
> > m68k do not build kernel-headers yet, but they will once I upload 2.6.11.
>
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:10:13PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:39:14PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> >
> > kernel-headers-$(version)-$(abiname)
> > This is arch-specific headers package containing all the common
> > headers/configs/Makefiles, etc.
>
> In the thre
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:41:48PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:08:21PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:52:19PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a couple of questions regarding kernel-headers. The 2.6 packages
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 283919 pending
Bug#283919: initrd-tools: Should warn if root device is not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 264839 pending
Bug#264839: initrd-tools: mkinitrd should include keyboard modules (i8042,
atkbd) in case an early
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:52:19PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:10:13PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:39:14PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > >
> > > kernel-headers-$(version)-$(abiname)
> > > This is arch-specific headers package con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 309308 sarge-ignore
Bug#309308: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: null pointer oops on udp packets
Tags were: security
Tags added: sarge-ignore
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 309307 sarge-ignore
Bug#309307: kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc in sarge lacks security fixes from
kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9
Tags were: sarge security
Tags added: sarge-ignore
>
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: breaks the whole system
kernel oops while trying to do a snmpwalk from a remote host. the entire
udp stack becomes unresponsive and reboot fails when trying to bring
down network interfaces. u
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc
Version: 2.4.27-2
Severity: critical
Tags: security, sarge
The package in sarge lacks the security fixes from
kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9 .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any Software just in under $15-$99, Xp-adobe etc
http://bnu.fmjuiefqcpx4ugx.turuntale.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
