Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> merge 303401 298727
Bug#298727: initrd-tools: After updating libdevmapper, no initrd can be built
Bug#303401: mkinitrd fails with cryptsetup and libdevmapper1.01
Merged 298727 303401.
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line don't substitute sym53c8xx for ncr53c8xx
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 04:46:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> The reason that the correct module is not included in the initrd seems to
> be a known problem [1].
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266239
Hmm, the information in that bug report is incorrect, because discover1-d
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686
Version: 2.6.11-2
Severity: normal
File: kernel-image-2.6.11
I get around 10 messages which say something like
"ERROR Removing module 'x'" where is a name of some module
just before init starts
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:36:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301701: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7: System catatonic when
tryingtowrite DVD or CD as user
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
It appears the ide-scsi module is broken in kernels since 2.6.9.
Recent versions of cdrecord and growisofs can talk to atapi devices
directly without first going through the ide-scsi abstraction layer when
using 2.6. But they appear only to do this if the ide-scsi abstraction
layer module is not li
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:22:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303777: kernel-image: Bind9 from woody fails to start;
capset failed: Operation not permitted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Nick Hill wrote:
>
> Everything I have checked points to the conclusion the version of
> CDrecord on my system is the current debian version.
ok your snipped the cd-record -version output, i couldnt guess that.
urrgs you shouldn't use scsi emulation for your ide drives,
re
reassign 303640 xserver-xfree86
thanks
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005, David Robin wrote:
> please note the message "XFree86: vm86 mode not supported on 64 bit
> kernel" at the end of the log. I have just noticed it. May this issue
> be related to XFree86?
thanks for pointing out that, seems so.
i'll reass
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:17:47PM +0200, David Robin wrote:
> please note the message "XFree86: vm86 mode not supported on 64 bit
> kernel" at the end of the log. I have just noticed it. May this issue
> be related to XFree86?
I'm assuming that this is using the amd64 kernel with a i386
userland?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 303640 xserver-xfree86
Bug#303640: kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8: Xfree86 fails to find a VESA chipset
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8' to
`xserver-xfree86'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-8_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha/kernel-build-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-8_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-generic_2.4.27-8_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha/kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-generic_2.4.27-8_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-generic_2.6.8-8_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha/kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-generic_2.6.8-8_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-smp_2.6.8-8_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha/kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-smp_2.6.8-8_alpha.deb
kernel-headers
kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha_2.6.8-8_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha_2.6.8-8.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha_2.6.8-8.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2_2.6.8-8_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-smp_2.6.8-8_alpha.deb
kernel-image-2.6.8-2-
kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha_2.4.27-8_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha_2.4.27-8.dsc
kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha_2.4.27-8.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-8_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-smp_2.4.27-8_alpha.deb
kernel-imag
I don't seem to be having any problems with this latest kernel. However as I
haven't been able to reproduce that error on the first patched 2.6.11, I
can't really be sure.
At this point it looks like all these bugs are fixed, so the bug can
probably be closed as soon as these are integrated into
maximilian attems wrote:
as debian sarge will release with 2.6.8,
it's not so much of a trouble it may be the selinux stuff,
dont know that cpset module?
modprobe capability
and entering the line
capability
in /etc/modules
allows bind9 to start.
#/etc/iniit.d/bind9 start
Starting domain name se
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc
Version: 2.6.8-12
Severity: important
The kernel image fails to boot on IBM RS/6000 Model 43P-140, which is a PreP
machine. The kernel doesn't post any message on the console. A self-compiled
2.6.11.6 works fine. Note that I use serial console as the IBM graph
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:36:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Problems with kernel-headers on sparc32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
maximilian attems wrote:
> you don't seem to use the debian cdrecord package,
try out, self compiled binaries are not supported by debian.
debian's cdrecord -version shows an different input.
if it still doesn't work, please provide full debian version with
$ dpkg -l
for example
dpkg -l cdrecord
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2005 10:32:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289995: fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.78
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Accepted:
initrd-tools_0.1.78.dsc
to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.78.dsc
initrd-tools_0.1.78.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.78.tar.gz
initrd-tools_0.1.78_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.78_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 01:20 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 02:49:56AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > > Bad news... I can't reproduce this problem, even on your machine. :) Can
> > > you tell me what kernel you were running at the time you saw the problem?
> > > Your initia
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2005 10:32:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#284961: fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.78
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
initrd-tools_0.1.78_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initrd-tools_0.1.78.dsc
initrd-tools_0.1.78.tar.gz
initrd-tools_0.1.78_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 301486 kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha
Bug#301486: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-generic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
Bug reassigned from package `discover1' to `kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
hi all,
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:52:53PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> please don't drop from cc the bug report. :)
sorry: this one is my first bug report :P
> On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 06:34:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > >
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Dear Debian Kernel Maintainers,
>
> Alan Cox has a patch against 2.6.10 that supports the IT 8212 RAID
> Controller, which is found on some motherboards.
just checked it's not in 2.6.12-rc2 nor in the ide-dev tree.
i guess alan hasn't submitted it y
reassign 301486 discover1
thanks
* Florian Hars wrote:
> It wasn't a initrd problem at all, /etc/rcS/S36discover was the
> culprit. If I disable qlogicisp for discover, 2.6.8-2 boots.
Alright, thanks for feedback and reporting!
So I'm reassigning this bugreport to discover1, see #289995 for
deta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 301486 discover1
Bug#301486: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-generic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-2-generic' to `discover1'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
> I can send them to you, but as I mentioned in my last e-mail I can't figure
> out how to reproduce the problem. Additionally it looks like Daniel Ritz
> already has a patch that he thinks fixes it. Do you still want me to try to
> get that data or jus
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Nick Hill wrote:
> >which version of cdrecord or growisofs package are you using?
>
> Both are listed in both the Debian and kernel.org bug along with plenty
> of other info.
you don't seem to use the debian cdrecord package,
try out, self compiled binaries are not supported
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:42:17 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Every book in my book shelf is software?
>
> If you digitalize it, yes.
AFAIK software only refers to programs, not to arbitrary sequences of
bytes. An MP3 file isn't "software". Although it surely isn't hardware
either.
--
Giusepp
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-generic
Version: 2.6.8-7
Severity: important
If I boot into 2.6.8-2, I have no mouse. Compare:
Linux alpha 2.4.27-2-generic #1 Tue Feb 15 01:56:26 UTC 2005 alpha
GNU/Linux
1:900 XT-PIC keyboard
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
7:
It wasn't a initrd problem at all, /etc/rcS/S36discover was the culprit.
If I disable qlogicisp for discover, 2.6.8-2 boots. See further bug
reports.
Yours, Florian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 289995 grave
Bug#289995: initrd-tools: use qla1280 on 2.6/alpha instead qlogicisp
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Additional information about my system:
Motherboard: Abit NF7-S2
Memory: 1024 MB
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : AMD Sempron(tm) 3000+
stepping: 0
cpu MHz : 2000.023
cache size
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: normal
Now two times my system has just hung. Only reboot with a power switch
has been possible. /var/log/syslog says this:
The first time:
Apr 9 22:19:23 mithlond kernel: [ cut here ]
Apr 9 22:19:23 mithlo
Moin David!
David Liontooth schrieb am Sonntag, den 10. April 2005:
> Jacques Goldberg writes the patch submitted with this bugreport is a
> poor solution to the problem and should not be used.
Any details?
> I request the bugreport be closed; a solution is in the works in the
> mainline kerne
I can send them to you, but as I mentioned in my last e-mail I can't figure
out how to reproduce the problem. Additionally it looks like Daniel Ritz
already has a patch that he thinks fixes it. Do you still want me to try to
get that data or just work with the new patch?
Thanks
J
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 02:49:56AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Bad news... I can't reproduce this problem, even on your machine. :) Can
> > you tell me what kernel you were running at the time you saw the problem?
> > Your initial report was from a machine that was running 2.4.27-1-smp, so I
>
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:12:35AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:14:42AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > Could you please check that the problem is still present for you?
>
> Will do.
The system is now running 2.4.27-2-sparc64, and has not failed in the
way it did when
For the sake of being accurrate:
Who am I to judge "poor" the working solution almost instantly provided
by Sasha Khapyorsky?
Obtaining the same effect with a loadable module will be better because
it will not require compilation of the kernel, just of the module. But
when?
Any TRAINED
Jacques Goldberg writes the patch submitted with this bugreport is a
poor solution to the problem and should not be used.
I request the bugreport be closed; a solution is in the works in the
mainline kernel.
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:14:42AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi Wouter,
>
> I have failed to reproduce the bug 277942 (oops/panic when
> loading or running with ipv6 module) with a recent kernel
> kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 version 2.4.27-9 (currently in sid).
> My machine is Ultra5 with H
45 matches
Mail list logo
