Hi Hendrik,
The problems with kernel-headers which you have reported in bug 284194
now appear to be fixed:
* The file include/asm-sparc/asm_offsets.h is present in the
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-sparc32 packages with version 2.4.27-2 (in
sarge) and 2.4.27-9 (in sid).
* Problem with compilati
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:55:23 -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
>> The way this works in practice is; I get i386 in shape, release k-s
>> 2.6.x-1. Svenl gets powerpc ready, and dannf gets ia64 ready (though
>> they don't coordinate), and Sven releases k-s 2.
Hi Wouter,
I have failed to reproduce the bug 277942 (oops/panic when
loading or running with ipv6 module) with a recent kernel
kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 version 2.4.27-9 (currently in sid).
My machine is Ultra5 with Happy Meal network card as well (TP
connection though). Could you please che
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:36:58PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> It seems that I missunderstood the preferences expressed
> by Steve Langasek in my discussions with him. As it turns
> out he feels that it would be best to get 0.37-2 ready,
> as 0.37-1 is currently in sarge and has been beaten
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-386
Version: 2.6.11-2
Severity: normal
/lib/modules/2.6.11-1-386 as installed has the following symbolic link:
source ->
/home/dilinger/src/kernel/kernel-image/2.6.11-2/kernel-image-2.6.11-i386-2.6.11/install-386
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT p
maximilian attems wrote:
which version of cdrecord or growisofs package are you using?
Both are listed in both the Debian and kernel.org bug along with plenty
of other info.
Cdrecord-Clone 2.01.01a01
* growisofs by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, version 5.21
> cant duplicate your problem with 2.6.11 and n
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, maximilian attems wrote:
disagreed,
all the archs managed in the d-k svn got their updates steadily.
problems are the trees outside of it as well d-i udebs relying
on a stable abi, which is easily broken on many security fixes.
Quite on the contrary, with the current way of doin
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Don't you think that the way you described (and that's the way it works
> now) is the major reason behind the very long times it takes to push
> through the security updates on all architectures? That way it make take
> people a long time to make k-i e
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Andres Salomon wrote:
The way this works in practice is; I get i386 in shape, release k-s
2.6.x-1. Svenl gets powerpc ready, and dannf gets ia64 ready (though
they don't coordinate), and Sven releases k-s 2.6.x-2. Horms throws some
security fixes in SVN; Joshk gets sparc ready
> > It's impossible to treat patents consistently.
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 04:38:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Even RedHat with a stronger financial background than Debian considered
> the MP3 patents being serious enough to remove MP3 support.
It's silly to treat financial risk as being a on
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:12:57 -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think it would be really useful if whoever is planning the next
> kernel-source upload would give at least 24-hour advance warning by
> e-mailing debian-kernel that such upload is planned. That would give
> people a chance to
On Saturday 09 April 2005 05:24, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
> Looks like I may have spoken a bit too soon. The problem is partially fixed,
> but I'm still having a few problems. After the system was up I ran cardctl
> eject 0 to stop and let me remove my Ethernet card and I got the follow
> error:
>
Hello,
I think it would be really useful if whoever is planning the next
kernel-source upload would give at least 24-hour advance warning by
e-mailing debian-kernel that such upload is planned. That would give
people a chance to review their patches, make last-minute additions and
build a test
please don't drop from cc the bug report. :)
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> first, thanks a lot for looking to this problem
ok, let's look if he can get nail that down.
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 06:34:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > Apr 6 19:54:47 ile kernel: Lin
Hi,
make sure you havce the crc32 module compiled and then:
$modprobe crc32
-James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Forwarded message from Philippe Bourcier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:51:37 +0200
From: Philippe Bourcier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#303550: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: irq11 makes eth0
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: kernel-image
> Version: 2.6.11-3
> Severity: important
>
> Bind9 from Debian woody will not start when run with this kernel. It does
> work
> with kernel 2.6.10 and previous.
as debian sarge will release with 2.6.8,
it's not so much of a
reassign 303926 initrd-tools
thanks
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
>
> Not sure if this is a kernel bug or not... Would like to remove unused modules
> if possable
it has to do with the reorganisation of the semi-broken modular ide patch,
that debian carried around. upstream ide-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 303926 initrd-tools
Bug#303926: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: Loads IDE Modules permanently
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686' to `initrd-tools'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
please don't forget to cc your bug reports!
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Nick Hill wrote:
> I have demonstrated this bug with a vanilla kernel.org kernel. I have
> found a similar blocking bug submitted on 20th February and appended a
> copy of the Debian bug.
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.c
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686
Version: 2.6.11-2
Severity: normal
Not sure if this is a kernel bug or not... Would like to remove unused modules
if possable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-i386
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Debian Kernel Maintainers,
Alan Cox has a patch against 2.6.10 that supports the IT 8212 RAID
Controller, which is found on some motherboards.
This patch (http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/28/79) applied with no
problem against the
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.77
Followup-For: Bug #270898
Today I experienced the same bug.
I installed 3 years ago a woody server with the same cd with xfs support.
It seems to be a kernel bug, because after downloading a new 2.4.30
kernel, compiling it and booting I've been able to insta
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
> Looks like I may have spoken a bit too soon. The problem is partially fixed,
> but I'm still having a few problems. After the system was up I ran cardctl
> eject 0 to stop and let me remove my Ethernet card and I got the follow
> error:
>
> eth0: no
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:31:22PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:34:00PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If Debian was at least consistent.
> >
> > Why has Debian a much more liberal interpretation of MP3 patent issues
> > than RedHat?
>
> It's impossible to treat patents
Accepted:
kernel-doc-2.6.11_2.6.11-3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.11/kernel-doc-2.6.11_2.6.11-3_all.deb
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11_2.6.11-3_all.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.11/kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11_2.6.11-3_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-3.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-3.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11_2.6.11-3_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-3_all.deb
kernel-tree-2.6.11_2.6.11-3_all.
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-3.diff.gz
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-3.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-3_all.deb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 303844 kernel-source-2.6.11
Bug#303844: resolve "device xxx is grabbed by another driver"
Bug reassigned from package `sl-modem-source' to `kernel-source-2.6.11'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
I have demonstrated this bug with a vanilla kernel.org kernel. I have
found a similar blocking bug submitted on 20th February and appended a
copy of the Debian bug.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4234
Given the severity of the bug, I am surprised it has survived two kernel
versions.
Resend Sorry. Forgot the bug.
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 23:16 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:17:49PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > I can arrange an account with sudo access.
>
> > As long as we do the account info off-bug.
>
> > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 18:06 -0
31 matches
Mail list logo
