Hi Greg,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:17:49PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> I can arrange an account with sudo access.
> As long as we do the account info off-bug.
> On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 18:06 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Apologies for the dormancy on this bug; yours is one o
Looks like I may have spoken a bit too soon. The problem is partially fixed,
but I'm still having a few problems. After the system was up I ran cardctl
eject 0 to stop and let me remove my Ethernet card and I got the follow
error:
eth0: no IPv6 routers present
irq 10: nobody cared!
[] __report_ba
Looks like the patch fixed the problem. What are the chances of getting this
included in sarge?
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: maximilian attems [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 12:07
> To: Jefferson Cow
Does this bug also occur when using the cifs driver instead of the smbfs
driver? It's my impression that the smbfs driver is no longer
well-maintained upstream in 2.6, and that the cifs driver is a better
choice. I'm not sure if we should consider this bug release-critical when
there are lots of
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:34:00PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> If Debian was at least consistent.
>
> Why has Debian a much more liberal interpretation of MP3 patent issues
> than RedHat?
It's impossible to treat patents consistently.
The U.S. patent office, at least, has granted patents on nat
The same for me:
# lspci | grep audio
:00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: ALi Corporation M5451 PCI
AC-Link Controller Audio Device (rev 02)
I get these warnings when execute alsa daemon:
# /etc/init.d/alsa restart
Shutting down ALSA...done.
Setting up ALSA.../etc/init.d/alsa: Warning: 'a
Hello,
32bit i386 iptables does currently not work with an amd64 64bit kernel.
This issue is reported to the upstream developers, and still pending.
A fix for sarge is not planned at the moment.
As a workaround, you can:
1. build a patched iptables package, using the patch found in
http://bu
please note the message "XFree86: vm86 mode not supported on 64 bit
kernel" at the end of the log. I have just noticed it. May this issue
be related to XFree86?
dmesg on the amd64 flavoured kernel :
Bootdata ok (command line is BOOT_IMAGE=Linux ro root=801)
Linux version 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 ([EMAIL
lsmod on the amd64-k8 kernel :
Module Size Used by
af_packet 23308 2
forcedeth 18432 0
amd74xx14768 1
ehci_hcd 30788 0
ohci_hcd 21252 0
eth139421840 0
ne2k_pci 10336 0
8390
* dmesg of 2.6.8-2-386 after boot and its lsmod :
v2.0 (20020519)
ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040326
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (00:00)
PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
PCI: Transparent bridge - :00:09.0
ACPI: PCI Interrupt R
* lspci -vv (with 2.6.8-2-386)
:00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 005e (rev a3)
Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.: Unknown device 7125
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Sta
Hi,
there are a few issues still open that we need to fix in sarge's kernel
images. Also, we need to solve a few procedural issues:
* How do we track which issues needs to be resolved?
* How do we track which packages need a rebuild after any change?
* Which updates are acceptable to push thro
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:42:51PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 à 19:34 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
>> GFDL documentation will still be available in the non-free archive.
>
> Assuming you have an online connection and a frie
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
> Thanks for the response.
>
> maximilian attems - Let me know when the kernel is built and I'll go ahead
> and try that.
the patch easy applied to 2.6.11 (1 line offset, easy to fix).
you'll find this kernel with the posted patch at
-> http://charm.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 303777 kernel
Bug#303777: kernel-image: Bind9 from woody fails to start; capset failed:
Operation not permitted
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image' to `kernel'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Pl
Package: kernel-image
Version: 2.6.11-3
Severity: important
Bind9 from Debian woody will not start when run with this kernel. It does work
with kernel 2.6.10 and previous.
#/etc/iniit.d/bind9 start
Starting domain name service: namednamed: capset failed: Operation not permitted
-- System Info
That should be debian kernel 2.6.11-3
which patches to 2.6.11.7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 Ã 20:01 +0200, Adrian Bunk a Ãcrit :
> > Because we already know that patents on MP3 decoders are not
> > enforceable. Furthermore, the holders of these patents have repeatedly
>
> How do you know the patents aren't enforceable?
Because decoding a MP3 is a trivial operat
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:42:51PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 à 19:34 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > > When there are several possible interpretations, you have to pick up the
> > > more conservative one, as it's not up to us to make the interpretation,
> > > but t
This bug still exists in kernel-image-2.6.11.7 and I would say is
release critical.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:22:00AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 à 23:07 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > > You are mixing apples and oranges. The fact that the GFDL sucks has
> > > nothing to do with the firmware issue. With the current situation of
> > > firmwares in the
Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 Ã 19:34 +0200, Adrian Bunk a Ãcrit :
> > When there are several possible interpretations, you have to pick up the
> > more conservative one, as it's not up to us to make the interpretation,
> > but to a court.
>
> If Debian was at least consistent.
>
> Why has Debian a m
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:54:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:31:36AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:05:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:56:47PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >...
> > > > If your statement was true
tags 303550 moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005, Philippe BOURCIER wrote:
> Apr 6 19:54:47 ile kernel: Linux version 2.6.11-1-686 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8)) #1 Sun Apr 3 06:20:48 EDT 2005
> Apr 6 19:55:15 ile kernel: eth0: flipped to 10baseT
> Apr 6 19:55:19
tags 303640 moreinfo
stop
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005, David Robin wrote:
> Subject: kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8: Xfree86 fails to find a VESA chipset
..
> I just installed Debian testing on a new Athlon64/nForce4 machine.
> This machine boots correctly with the default i386 (2.6.8-2) kernel installed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 303550 moreinfo
Bug#303550: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: irq11 makes eth0 problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 303640 moreinfo
Bug#303640: kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8: Xfree86 fails to find a VESA chipset
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Hi,
I'm using the testing branch and iptables-1.2.11-8.
I have just upgraded one of our production boxes from
kernel-image-2.4.26-2-686 to kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 - partly
because we just upgraded to an AMD64 processor.
However, after booting on the new kernel, iptables will not run:
ipt
Hi…
I think we had correspondence a long time ago if it was not you I am sorry.
If it was I could not answer you because my Mozilla mail manager was down for a
long time and I could not fix it only with my friend's help I got the emails
address out for me ..:)
I hope it was whom we were cor
Hi,
Ludovic Courtes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, there doesn't seem to be any `kernel-image-2.4.26-*' package in
> `testing' as said in [3]. The `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc32' package
> in there depends on `libc6' which is known to depend on a 2.4.21 or
> newer kernel.
[...]
> [3] http
hello,
the list you posted to are about debian kernels
and it's issue.
you'll get more info at the mailinglists of kernelnewbies.org
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, cmd.exe wrote:
> i configure a very small kernel, compile it and install,
> when i reboot, it stop after print
> Rebooting system...
>
> i d
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>Hi,
Hi.
>Humberto Massa wrote:
>
>>First, there is *NOT* any requirement in the GPL at all that requires
>>making compilers available. Otherwise it would not be possible, for
>>instance, have a Visual Basic GPL'd application. And yes, it is
>>possible.
>
>
>From section 3 of
tags 291386 patch
thanks
Hi all,
After poking at this, I believe the attached patch represents the best
available heuristic for choosing lvm10 vs. lvm2 for the initrd, given that
(AIUI) there is no apparent way to query the type of an individual volume
from userspace.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 09:08 -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >Debian doesn't seem to care much about the possible legal problems of
> >patents.
You have lots of "possible legal problems" of any kind. Basically
everyone can sue you for (almost) whatever he wants almost all ofth
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 291386 patch
Bug#291386: creates initrd that cannot use lvm 2 volumes if both lvm2 and lvm10
are installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Debian doesn't seem to care much about the possible legal problems of
patents.
The possible legal problem of software patents is, up to the present
time, AFAICT, not producing effects yet in Europe, and is a non-problem
in jurisdictions like mine (down here neither business
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:07:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:05:07PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le lundi 04 avril 2005 à 21:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:05:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > > On Apr 04, Greg KH <[EMAIL PRO
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:32:01AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Ok, I'll try and be a little more specific. Do you know of any
> > machines that are available to kernel team members, or more
> > generally debian developers, to do ppc buil
On Fri, 8 April 2005 09:22:00 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 à 23:07 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
>
> > As a contrast, read the discussion between Christoph and Arjan in a part
> > of this thread how to move firmware out of kernel drivers without
> > problems for the use
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:36:58PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> It seems that I missunderstood the preferences expressed
> by Steve Langasek in my discussions with him. As it turns
> out he feels that it would be best to get 0.37-2 ready,
> as 0.37-1 is currently in sarge and has been beaten
Hi,
Humberto Massa wrote:
> First, there is *NOT* any requirement in the GPL at all that requires
> making compilers available. Otherwise it would not be possible, for
> instance, have a Visual Basic GPL'd application. And yes, it is
> possible.
>From section 3 of the GNU GPL, version 2:
Th
Hi,
On ven, avr 08, 2005, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:31:01PM +0200, Timo Veith wrote:
> > But when booting linux26, hardware detection fails. No disks are found. I
> > can report another bug, if anybody considers this as important.
Timo, as you guessed this is a separate
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:54:06AM +0200, Luca Corti wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:46 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > The bug almost certainly lies in the source code, which is
> > contained in kernel-source-2.6.8, lets track it there
> > rather than fragmenting the bug report.
>
> Ok, but it
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Ok, I'll try and be a little more specific. Do you know of any
> machines that are available to kernel team members, or more
> generally debian developers, to do ppc builds?
trick.rz.uni-augsburg.de, a power5 machine, is open on request.
B
Hi,
Exactly the same for me with intel8x0 soundcard :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsmod|grep snd
snd_intel8x0m 18500 4
snd_intel8x0 33216 3
snd_ac97_codec 78360 2 snd_intel8x0m,snd_intel8x0
snd_pcm_oss53344 0
snd_mixer_oss 19872 3 snd_pcm_oss
snd_pcm
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 04:15:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 à 09:03 -0400, Richard B. Johnson a écrit :
> > Well it doesn't make any difference. If GPL has degenerated to
> > where one can't upload microcode to a device as part of its
> > initialization, without havin
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:46 +0900, Horms wrote:
> The bug almost certainly lies in the source code, which is
> contained in kernel-source-2.6.8, lets track it there
> rather than fragmenting the bug report.
Ok, but it applies also to subsequent versions of the kernel source
packages, so bugs cou
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:03:01AM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Humberto Massa wrote:
>
> >David Schmitt wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday 07 April 2005 09:25, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >>
> >>>[snip] I got it from Alteon under a written agreement stating I
> >>>could distribute th
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:50:14PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> >The fact is also that mixing them with a GPLed software gives
> >an result you can't redistribute - although it seems many people
> >disagree with that assertion now.
>
> This is only true if the result
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:50:54AM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Humberto Massa wrote:
>
> >Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >
> >>You are mixing apples and oranges. The fact that the GFDL sucks has
> >>nothing to do with the firmware issue. With the current situation of
> >>firm
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:55:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Horms,
> > The current d-i kernel image is linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 0.05.
> > I am not sure which version of kernel-source this is based on,
> > as a quick glance of the .dsc seems to indicate that the
> > source dependancy is not v
Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 à 23:07 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > You are mixing apples and oranges. The fact that the GFDL sucks has
> > nothing to do with the firmware issue. With the current situation of
> > firmwares in the kernel, it is illegal to redistribute binary images of
> > the kernel. Fu
52 matches
Mail list logo
