On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:53:45PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:10:18 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:13:32PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >> OTOH, I have hardware that's already not supported by sarge (VIA video
> >> chipset that's only suppor
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:38:44 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line CAN-2005-0530 not in 2.4.27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:41:41PM +, J. Grant wrote:
> Hi Horms,
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> >Yes, thanks. I have made the same changes for 2.6.
> >If you could review the attached patch, which has
> >been included in SVN and should show up in the
> >next release of the respective patc
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6.10-9-amd64-generic_2.6.10-5_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64/kernel-headers-2.6.10-9-amd64-generic_2.6.10-5_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.10-5_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64/kernel-headers-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:47:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#276988: fixed in kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 102
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-generic_102_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-amd64/kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-generic_102_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_102_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-amd64/kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_102_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-amd
kernel-latest-2.6-amd64_102_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-latest-2.6-amd64_102.dsc
kernel-latest-2.6-amd64_102.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-generic_102_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-generic_102_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-k8_102_i3
kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64_2.6.10-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64_2.6.10-5.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64_2.6.10-5.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.10-9_2.6.10-5_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.10-5_i386.deb
kerne
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:10:18 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:13:32PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>> OTOH, I have hardware that's already not supported by sarge (VIA video
>> chipset that's only supported by xorg). As much as the security team is
>> loathe to support multip
The same with my Sony VAIO PCG-FR215.
But I can get my battery status again running this:
# rmmod battery
# /etc/init.d/acipd restart
Hope this help..
kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 (2.6.10-6)
acpi (0.07-3)
acpid (1.0.4-1)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 05:07:08PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:35:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - Add the security fix in before sarge's release, with a change to the
> > package names to reflect the ABI change. This will probably require at
> > least a
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:35:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > RC3 of Debian Installer is already being finalized, with only the CD builds
> > to finish up today and tomorrow; the ABI change is being held of testing in
> > th
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:13:32PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> OTOH, I have hardware that's already not supported by sarge (VIA video
> chipset that's only supported by xorg). As much as the security team is
> loathe to support multiple kernels, it does seem like having multiple
> kernels in d-
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.6.8-2_2.6.8-15_sparc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc/kernel-build-2.6.8-2_2.6.8-15_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-sparc32_2.6.8-15_sparc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc/kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-sparc32_2.6.8-15_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2
Hi Horms,
Thank you for your email.
Yes, thanks. I have made the same changes for 2.6.
If you could review the attached patch, which has
been included in SVN and should show up in the
next release of the respective patchages, that would
be great.
They look perfect to me. Thank you for making this
kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc_2.6.8-15_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc_2.6.8-15.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc_2.6.8-15.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2_2.6.8-15_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-sparc32_2.6.8-15_sparc.deb
kernel-image
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:27:20 +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>> How big is the chance that we will have another ABI change during
>> sarge's lifetime (100%?). So it can't hurd to figure out the problems
>> with that now independentl
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:27:20PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > How big is the chance that we will have another ABI change during
> > sarge's lifetime (100%?). So it can't hurd to figure out the problems
> > with that now inde
* Andres Salomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050323 20:00]:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:30:38 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Humberto Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-23 10:25]:
> >> Important question: is sarge *really* being released in the next 1 or 2
> >> months? If not, there is no good reason
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> How big is the chance that we will have another ABI change during
> sarge's lifetime (100%?). So it can't hurd to figure out the problems
> with that now independently of our decision in this matter...
Absolutely. It's bound to
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:30:38 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Humberto Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-23 10:25]:
>> Important question: is sarge *really* being released in the next 1 or 2
>> months? If not, there is no good reason not to do this. All the other
>> stuff that is going on in s
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 16:09, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> My experience with the whole kernel stuff is limited so excuse the
> question: Where is the bottleneck? Building the kernels, testing the
> kernels or whatever else?
IMHO the main problem is that currently loads of other patches are stil
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-6
Severity: normal
After untarring 2.6.10-6 and recompiling (w/o changing my
configuration), snd no longer works. Downgrading to my previous kernel
(compiled from 2.6.10-5) fixes the problem. I see the following error
message on startup:
Mar 23 10:16
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:35:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> - Add the security fix in before sarge's release, with a change to the
> package names to reflect the ABI change. This will probably require at
> least a month to get all kernel images rebuilt and integrated into a
> debian-in
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:35:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> RC3 of Debian Installer is already being finalized, with only the CD builds
> to finish up today and tomorrow; the ABI change is being held of testing in
> the meantime. This leaves the following possible options:
>
> - Add the sec
* Humberto Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-23 10:25]:
> Important question: is sarge *really* being released in the next 1 or 2
> months? If not, there is no good reason not to do this. All the other
> stuff that is going on in sarge can be done in parallel with this, and
> d-i won't be the bot
Steve Langasek wrote, among other stuff:
>As I touched on briefly on IRC, there is an upcoming kernel security
>fix that requires a bit of discussion. It appears that one of the
>security fixes that was included in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-14 (and
>backed out, at least temporarily, in 2.6.8-15),
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:33:05AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am finally nearing the bottom of my todo list for the
> > up and coming release of kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9.
> > And to date, the only ABI change I have is for CAN-2005-0449,
> > as per my mail
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7
Version: 2.6.8-13
I ran 'ifconfig eth0' which crashed with segfault. Before, I did a
modprobe -r ip_gre
which was successful. GRE-Tunnels were configured some time ago, but
removed at the time of the ifconfig.
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual addr
clone 299875 -1
reassign -1 ppp
retitle -1 ppp_2.4.3 pppd hangs on re-connect
tags -1 - patch
tags -1 - security
severity -1 important
thanks
The security issue does not seem relevant to this bug, according to
the submitter. Hence reassign to ppp, where downgrading "solves" the
issue.
This might
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 299875 -1
Bug#299875: CAN-2005-0384: Remote Linux DoS on ppp servers
Bug 299875 cloned as bug 301018.
> reassign -1 ppp
Bug#301018: CAN-2005-0384: Remote Linux DoS on ppp servers
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `ppp'.
> retitle -1 ppp_2.
Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am finally nearing the bottom of my todo list for the
> up and coming release of kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9.
> And to date, the only ABI change I have is for CAN-2005-0449,
> as per my mail yesterday.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2005/03/msg00689.html
>
tag 296639 +pending
thanks
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:16:12PM +, Edward Miller wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-8
> Followup-For: Bug #296639
>
> I have been monitoring kernel.org for any problems caused by the timer
> override patch that I submitted earlier and that i
Hi,
I am finally nearing the bottom of my todo list for the
up and coming release of kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9.
And to date, the only ABI change I have is for CAN-2005-0449,
as per my mail yesterday.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2005/03/msg00689.html
To the best of my knowledge 2.6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 296639 +pending
Bug#296639: kernel-source-2.4.27: nforce[23] backport of
acpi_skip_timer_override
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:44:11PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to advise that kernel-source-2.4.27 is
> vulnerable to CAN-2005-0449 and that the fix requires
> an ABI change. This is the same situation as kernel-source-2.6.8,
> and the patch is almost identical.
>
> CAN-2005-0449 i
Hi Joey,
As I touched on briefly on IRC, there is an upcoming kernel security fix
that requires a bit of discussion. It appears that one of the security
fixes that was included in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-14 (and backed out, at
least temporarily, in 2.6.8-15), changes the kernel module ABI for a
tag 300163 +pending
thanks
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:42:28PM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> Version: 2.6.8-14
> Severity: normal
> Tags: security patch
>
> CAN-2004-1191 reads:
>
> Race condition ... when run on SMP systems that have more than 4GB of
> memory, cou
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:42:28PM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> Version: 2.6.8-14
> Severity: normal
> Tags: security patch
>
> CAN-2004-1191 reads:
>
> Race condition ... when run on SMP systems that have more than 4GB of
> memory, could allow local users to read
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:56:19PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:42:28PM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> > Version: 2.6.8-14
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: security patch
> >
> > CAN-2004-1191 reads:
> >
> > Race condition ... when run on SMP sys
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:01:15 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300495: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386: i810_audio.o fails at
load
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 300163 +pending
Bug#300163: [CAN-2004-1191]: Race condition could allow local users to read
unauthorized memory from "foreign memory pages."
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:19:09PM +, J. Grant wrote:
> Ok Revised 2.4 entries:
>
> Revised: http://packages.debian.org/testing/base/kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k7
> ===
> This package contains the Linux kernel image for version 2.4.27 targeted
> for 32bit AMD Du
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Perhaps this could be solved with some kind of ticket system handling
email to the official roles in debian? I'm not sure if BTS is the
best option to handle emails to ftpmaster, leader and others. Perhaps
request-tracker is a better option? We use it at work, and it s
44 matches
Mail list logo
