Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7
Version: 2.6.10-4
Severity: normal
lib/modules/2.6.10-1-k7/source points to maintainer's build directory.
This is a problem when compiling non-debian kernel modules with
debian stock image and debian kernel sources.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
AP
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:35:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 04:12:06PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > the kernel team asks for an irc meeting regarding
> > the chosen kernel for the sarge release.
> > the meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 02. Feb 18h UT.
>
> > i
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:01:48PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> Wow - I didn't realize we hadn't even finished -2 yet; looks like hppa
> (and possibly m68k - can't say, they don't use kernel-tree) still
> haven't been built against the source w/ the new ABI.
>
Sorry, I've been exceptionally busy.
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 12:03 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > I pointed this out on IRC, but just to make sure it hits the list...
> > Turning of PREEMPT will change the module ABI. ia64 also has PREEMPT
> > turned on in 2.6.8 (following suit w/ x86), and I've left it on for this
>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 08:46:35PM +, Greg Kochanski wrote:
> Unexpectedly, it is reproducible.
>
> Here's the relevant bit of ps -e -F . This was taken
> a minute or so after I started the strace find .
>
> gpk 16650 16555 0 646 1480 0 20:35 pts/700:00:00 bash
> gpk 1665
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 08:32:39PM +, Greg Kochanski wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 04:38:05PM +, Greg Kochanski wrote:
> >
> >>Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> >>Version: 2.6.8-12
> >>Severity: important
> >>
> >>
> >>Load average is reported very high, but it ain't so
dann frazier wrote:
> I pointed this out on IRC, but just to make sure it hits the list...
> Turning of PREEMPT will change the module ABI. ia64 also has PREEMPT
> turned on in 2.6.8 (following suit w/ x86), and I've left it on for this
> reason.
Guys, if you change the ABI on me again right now,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 04:12:06PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> the kernel team asks for an irc meeting regarding
> the chosen kernel for the sarge release.
> the meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 02. Feb 18h UT.
> if that time is very inconvenient for you please speak up,
> Friday 04. Feb 1
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, AKL. Mantas Kriauciunas wrote:
> I can't boot 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 kernels on my system while 2.6.7 was
> installed on same system and starts without problems few months ago.
>
> I got the same error like others - cannot open dev/console, preceded
> by a message from pivot_root w
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > the kernel team asks for an irc meeting regarding
> > the chosen kernel for the sarge release.
> > the meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 02. Feb 18h UT.
> >
> > if that time is very inconvenient fo
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686
Version: 2.6.10-4
Severity: normal
My Intel NIC (uses e100 module) stop to work suddenly.
Nothing is reported to syslog ou dmesg. It just stop to work.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture
Unexpectedly, it is reproducible.
Here's the relevant bit of ps -e -F . This was taken
a minute or so after I started the strace find .
gpk 16650 16555 0 646 1480 0 20:35 pts/700:00:00 bash
gpk 16659 16650 1 428 572 0 20:36 pts/700:00:01 strace
find . -name #cvs
gpk
Horms wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 04:38:05PM +, Greg Kochanski wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-12
Severity: important
Load average is reported very high, but it ain't so.
$ cat /proc/loadavg
52.80 51.80 50.81 4/202 8431
$
The system is currently unloaded and quite res
Quoting maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> the kernel team asks for an irc meeting regarding
> the chosen kernel for the sarge release.
> the meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 02. Feb 18h UT.
>
> if that time is very inconvenient for you please speak up,
> Friday 04. Feb 18h UT would also b
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:56:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#284783: kernel-image-2.6.9-1-686-smp: Kernel oops possibly
related to kswapd
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I have in the past suggested alternative IRC networks. One such would
> be OFTC, a network that is also under the SPI umbrella. I'm open to
> other suggestions, but Feenode is unacceptable to me.
oftc sounds good,
seems like in my announce i forgot t
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 4:51 pm, maximilian attems wrote:
> severity 284783 serious
> thanks
>
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Sean O'Dubhghaill wrote:
> > I'm now running 2.6.10 (not from unstable though it's vanilla with ac1
> > patches) and I haven't had a single kernel opps since. I've attached a
> > dmes
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:20:56PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Matthew Wilcox]
> > I will not subject myself to the whims of Rob Levin.
>
> Why do you believe others are interested in your conflict with some
> (to me at least) unknown person Rob Levin?
He runs Freenode. "whois freenode.
> I've tried using "mkinitrd" and adding "md" and "raid1" to the
> /etc/mkinitrd/modules.conf file, but no change.
I included "ext3" as well (since thats the fs on the root partition) in
this list but that didn't make any difference either.
Searching the web, I found several references to this pi
[Matthew Wilcox]
> I will not subject myself to the whims of Rob Levin.
Why do you believe others are interested in your conflict with some
(to me at least) unknown person Rob Levin?
If you wanted to be constructive, you might have suggested an
alternative network, and provided some explanation o
I too am getting this problem, but with a PC using nothing but IDE drives.
I suspect that the trouble stems from the fact I'm trying to set up a RAID1
mirror as my root disk.
I've tried using "mkinitrd" and adding "md" and "raid1" to the
/etc/mkinitrd/modules.conf file, but no change.
The 2.4 ker
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 04:12:06PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> arch Maintainer please attend, to have your opinion voiced.
I will only attend if the meeting is hosted on a different IRC network.
I will not subject myself to the whims of Rob Levin.
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap l
the kernel team asks for an irc meeting regarding
the chosen kernel for the sarge release.
the meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 02. Feb 18h UT.
if that time is very inconvenient for you please speak up,
Friday 04. Feb 18h UT would also be possible,
but Wednesday would be preferred.
arch Maintai
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 292221
Bug#292221: d-i: mkinitrd STILL omits medley.o (see also #265424)
Bug#265424: installation-reports: mkinitrd omits medley module needed to mount
root
Disconnected #292221 from all other report(s).
> clone 292221 -1
Bug#292221: d-i: mkin
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.01.28.2220 +0100]:
> My sincere thanks to Martin Krafft for guiding me through this.
My sincere thanks to Russell for following up on this and posting
the summary.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`.
if someone is willing to put the effort in to get it working.
FYI, the patch provided above works fine for me.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mon 2005-01-31 at 13:30 +0300 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > [1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01/msg00171.html
> Is gconfig even maintained upstream?
Dunno, but 2.6.10-ac5 has the following changelog entry that might
be wo
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:09:20 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292797: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 checksum mismatches
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:48:02 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291995: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386: Sound driver Advanced
Logic (ALS4000) doesn't work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 04:38:05PM +, Greg Kochanski wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> Version: 2.6.8-12
> Severity: important
>
>
> Load average is reported very high, but it ain't so.
>
> $ cat /proc/loadavg
> 52.80 51.80 50.81 4/202 8431
> $
>
> The system is currently unloade
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 06:38:57PM +0200, AKL. Mantas Kriauciunas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't boot 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 kernels on my system while 2.6.7 was
> installed on same system and starts without problems few months ago.
>
> I got the same error like others - cannot open dev/console, preceded
> b
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 02:21:10PM +0100, Lockenvitz Jan EXT wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.77
>
> when installing the initrd-tools it finishes with some errors in post-install.
> It seems som files are missing:
>
> /etc/mkinitrd/mkinitrd.conf
> /etc/mkinitrd/modules
> /etc/default
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Followup-For: Bug #292601
>
> Does this[1] help?
>
> Regards
> /Jocke
>
> [1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01/msg00171.html
Is gconfig even maintained upstream?
Generally the kernel team doesn
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 03:06:43PM +, Greg Kochanski wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> Version: 2.6.8-12
> Severity: normal
>
>
> A process hung, and was not killable, even with kill -9.
>
> The process was started as
> find . -name '#cvs*'
>
> Here's an attempt to kill it:
It i
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 10:46:30AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: kernel-headers-2.6.10-1
> Version: 2.6.10-4
>
> The DVB headers from dvb-core are not being included in the headers package;
> this confuses the video4linux snapshots. Copying them out of the source
> package fixes th
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:36:09 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292651: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7: timeout in zero-length
accesses to samba shares, dmesg: "smb_trans2: invalid data, [..]"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means
36 matches
Mail list logo
