On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:29:17PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Horms wrote:
> > I have uploaded some 2.4.26-6 source and 386 packages to
> > http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/ for people to take a look at.
>
> Doesn't build on woody with gcc 2.95:
>
> /usr/bin/make -C atm modules
> make
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 10:50:11PM +0200, Jan-Jaap van der Heijden wrote:
> >
> >hmm, we should enable CONFIG_KALLSYMS to get useful backtraces on alpha,
> >I'd love to see where this oops comes from.
> >
> Could you enlighten me? CONFIG_KALLSYMS is set in the kernel config.
> /sbin/kallsyms is abl
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:14:22AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:52:20PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > We won't modify upstream names. There's a bunch of controllers that use
> > this style of names, and it'll remain so until devfs will be phased out
> > not
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686
Version: 2.6.7-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The sidewinder module is compile with debuging, so each time you move
the joystick, the write some value in the log. Quickly the logs are full
of uneeded value...
Matthieu
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:56:16 +0200, botio wrote:
> Just for information, this issue seems to be specific to recent intel
> motherboards and is discussed here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125841
Actually, looks like it's already in 2.6.8-rc4. Once my colo box is
fixed,
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Have you guys seen this advisory yet? It looks rather serious:
http://isec.pl/vulnerabilities/isec-0016-procleaks.txt
Apparently this is fixed in 2.4.27-rc5 (don't know about 2.6 series):
http://lwn.net/Articles/96485/
The fix should probably go into Debian kernels in sarge
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:56:16 +0200, botio wrote:
> Just for information, this issue seems to be specific to recent intel
> motherboards and is discussed here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125841
Thanks. I can throw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?i
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:08:45PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I think you're mistaken. The known bug in the DV scsi core was fixed
> 9 weeks ago (according to Linus' bkweb). There's still at least one
> other bug which Dann can replicate at will on one of his machines.
> Last I heard, he was
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:08:45PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I think you're mistaken. The known bug in the DV scsi core was fixed
> 9 weeks ago (according to Linus' bkweb).
I know there's one thing that James fixed after 2.6.7.
> BTW, sym2 is currently the only driver making use of the DV c
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:22:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:12:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > The only ones that aren't already upstream, afaict, are:
> > sym53c8xx_revert.patch - The new domain validation stuff mysteriously
> >
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:22:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:12:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > The only ones that aren't already upstream, afaict, are:
> > sym53c8xx_revert.patch - The new domain validation stuff mysteriously
> >
* Horms wrote:
> I have uploaded some 2.4.26-6 source and 386 packages to
> http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/ for people to take a look at.
Doesn't build on woody with gcc 2.95:
/usr/bin/make -C atm modules
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/tretkowski/kernel-image-2.4.26-i386-2.4.26/kernel-im
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 07:45:56PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>* Merged in device mapper patch from devmapper-1.00.19
> (after discussion on this list)
>See:
> http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/kernel-source-2.4.26-2.4.26/kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-6_i386.changes
Does it provide biarch io
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:12:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> The only ones that aren't already upstream, afaict, are:
> sym53c8xx_revert.patch - The new domain validation stuff mysteriously
>breaks on one of my test boxes - I suggested to
>
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:03:12PM -0300, Peter Cordes wrote:
> Good idea. I think that makes a lot of sense. It doesn't say it's a 64bit
> kernel, but that's what arch fields in packages are for, so it doesn't have
> to, right?
The flavours where all renamed to amd64-* to not clash with other
Hi,
I have uploaded some 2.4.26-6 source and 386 packages to
http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/ for people to take a look at.
In a nutshell the changes are:
kernel-source-2.4.26-6
* Fix for CAN-2004-0415
(http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED] +
http://linux.bkbi
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:52:20PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> We won't modify upstream names. There's a bunch of controllers that use
> this style of names, and it'll remain so until devfs will be phased out
> not too long in the future.
Is somewhere a list of all such controllers and t
17 matches
Mail list logo
