Hi,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:35:29PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> There have been some reports of gcc-3.4 miscompiling the kernel but I
> think that was fixed.
It was the gcc-3.3 version with activated hammer branch for amd64
creating broken kernels.
gcc-3.4 is fine for building Linux
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I spent some time talking with the glibc maintainers about this. These
> are all my own opinions, but the others seemed to agree with me.
>
> I think this would be a very good idea.
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp
Severity: normal
On a newly-installed Dell PowerEdge 2600 I get the following on boot:
hw_random hardware driver 1.0.0 loaded
kobject_register failed for aic79xx (-17)
[kobject_register+91/96] kobject_register+0x5b/0x60
[bus_add_driver+80/176] bus_add_drive
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:53:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> mailine kernels build out of the box. The additional early printk
> support in the ia64 patch has been replaced with something better in
> mainline, leaving only a completly unrelated and unexplainable usb
> change in david's pat
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now.
and gcc-3.3 also because of libstdc++5...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Gnu
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:28:23PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now.
Oops. OK, it would have to be a separate GCC source package or depend
on a new version of toolchain-source then. We could do this just for
sarge and build it from gcc-3.4 i
gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now.
Daniel
--
/ Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---\
| We are Debian of Borg.|
| You will be packaged.
I spent some time talking with the glibc maintainers about this. These
are all my own opinions, but the others seemed to agree with me.
I think this would be a very good idea.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> given the current sarge deadline and th
Accepted:
kernel-doc-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.26/kernel-doc-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.26/kernel-patch-debian-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb
kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/
kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-5.dsc
kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-5.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb
kernel-tree-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb
kernel-doc-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb
reopen 253871
thanks
Because of #262540, this bug is still valid for current kernel images.
Norbert
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 253871
Bug#253871: CAN-2004-0554 user application can hang the kernel
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
* Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Norbert Tretkowski writes:
>> I just discovered that CAN-2004-0554 is still valid, at least for
>> kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 2.4.26-4 from unstable. I tested it on
>> two machines, and both machines crashed when running crash.c.
>
> This is related to Bug#262540. In fact
Hi,
Norbert Tretkowski writes:
> I just discovered that CAN-2004-0554 is still valid, at least for
> kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 2.4.26-4 from unstable. I tested it on
> two machines, and both machines crashed when running crash.c.
This is related to Bug#262540. In fact, patch-2.4.26-3 has not b
Hi,
I just discovered that CAN-2004-0554 is still valid, at least for
kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 2.4.26-4 from unstable. I tested it on
two machines, and both machines crashed when running crash.c.
Norbert
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.72
Severity: grave
mkinitrd fails if the specified storage modules are compiled into the
kernel. This makes it unusable on s390 as any current kernels have them
compiled in.
| /usr/sbin/mkinitrd: add_modules_dep_2_5: modprobe failed
| FATAL: Module dasd_eckd_mod
Hi,
Ingo Juergensmann writes:
> Anyway, regarding to other mails regarding to this bugreport, I think you
> can now close this bug.
It's tagged as pending and will be closed on the next upload of
kernel-patch-powerpc. If anybody feels the need for it, feel free to
reassign to that package, or
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:04:21AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:36:20AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>
> > Update to 2.6.8-rc2 or later and it applies fine. And when the patch
> > is applied, the kernel compiles...
>
> I already used the latest available kernel-sourc
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:36:20AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Update to 2.6.8-rc2 or later and it applies fine. And when the patch
> is applied, the kernel compiles...
I already used the latest available kernel-source and kernel-patch for my
subarch (i.e. PegasosII). I think, if 2.6.8-rc2 would
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:38:57AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> As I said, a working patch is in svn. Since you seem in need of it, I
> will also attach it to this message.
Well, "needing" is too strong... after compiling the kernel with old
binutils and actually running it, I just wanted to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> > With a 2.6.8-rc2-bk9 kernel things work fine right now, no CRC
> > errors so far.
Today I had CRC errors again :(
They occured while copying data from /dev/hde to /dev/hdf.
When having only hde active, I get no CRC errors.
So the problem does
unsubscribe
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s)
and to other interested parties to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
Jens Schmalzing:
> I have no idea how to construct those nifty URLs that you can click
> on,
Got it :)
http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/kernel/trunk/kernel/powerpc/kernel-
patch-powerpc-2.6.7-2.6.7/patches/binutils.diff?view=auto>
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux
Hi,
Ingo Juergensmann writes:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109130201415594&w=2 is a
> better URL, because it doesn't trash patches.
I wouldn't be so sure about this, seeing the following result :)
> Anyway, the result:
>
> muaddib:/usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.7# patch -p1 <
tags 263057 pending
thanks
Hi,
Ingo Juergensmann writes:
> c&p'ed that patch to ppc-patch:
Obviously, the list archive interface ate a number of vital spaces.
> Please supply a working patch file
It's in svn now. I have no idea how to construct those nifty URLs
that you can click on, anyway
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.72
mkinitrd does not detect some SCSI modules to add them to
the loadmodules file on the initrd, e.g. sata_sil. At boot
time these modules are not loaded, which might break access
to the root disk.
Attached you can find a patch.
Regards
Harri
--- /usr/sbin/mkinitr
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s)
and to other interested parties to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:23:12PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>
>> Please try the patch in:
>> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0407.3/1810.html
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109130201415594&w=2 is a
> better URL, bec
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:23:12PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Please try the patch in:
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0407.3/1810.html
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109130201415594&w=2 is a
better URL, because it doesn't trash patches.
Anyway, the result:
mua
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:23:12PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Please try the patch in:
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0407.3/1810.html
c&p'ed that patch to ppc-patch:
muaddib:/usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.7# patch -p1 < ../ppc-patch
patching file arch/ppc/Makefile
patch: malf
tags 263058 pending
thanks
Hi,
Troy Benjegerdes writes:
> I've confirmed that setting CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE=y resolves the
> problem.
Thanks for investigating this. I've checked the change into svn.
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 263058 pending
Bug#263058: kernel-image-2.6.7-powerpc: Early G4 Xserve does not init ide
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
33 matches
Mail list logo
