On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 04:45:57 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[...]
>
> Aren't experimental and unstable in different override files?
>
Quoting AJ:
"For people uploading to experimental, you should be aware of the
following:
* experimental uses the same overrides as unstable. Packages
al
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:28:46PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Note that one thing I'm concerned about (and probably should've mentioned
> in my original post) is ia64 and alpha; getting 2.6.8 into sarge will be
> tight. Assume that i386 and powerpc will be thrown in w/ kernel-source,
> as thos
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:52:17 +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Andres Salomon writes:
>>
>>> There has been some talk on IRC about what kernel to release sarge
>>> with; some people would prefer 2.6.8 (which hasn't been released
>>> yet).
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:52:17 +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andres Salomon writes:
>
>> There has been some talk on IRC about what kernel to release sarge
>> with; some people would prefer 2.6.8 (which hasn't been released
>> yet). If we want to do that, I would suggest getting a jump
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 04:57:40AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> At some point in the past, I wrote:
>> >> The 2.6.8 release has been almost exclusively focused on stabilization.
>> >> I highly recommend adopting as much of 2.6.8 as possible if no
Hi!
This is my correct e-mail address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist.
--
Joosep-Georg Järvemaa
Package: kernel
Version: 20040801
Severity: normal
Setting up kernel-image-2.4.18-1-686-smp (2.4.18-13.1) ...
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: /dev/vg0/lv1: Unknown root device
Please refer to the manual page.
Failed to create initrd image.
dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.4.18-1-686
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.4.26-1_2.4.26-3_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.26-alpha/kernel-build-2.4.26-1_2.4.26-3_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.26-1-generic_2.4.26-3_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.26-alpha/kernel-headers-2.4.26-1-generic_2.4.26-3_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-powerpc
Version: 2.6.7-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
The radeonfb driver on my iBook does not bring the display back properly
after sleeping. After sleep the backlight turns back on but the display
remains completely dark. I have had this problem with the old and the
new ra
kernel-image-2.4.26-alpha_2.4.26-3_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4.26-alpha_2.4.26-3.dsc
kernel-image-2.4.26-alpha_2.4.26-3.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.4.26-1_2.4.26-3_alpha.deb
kernel-image-2.4-generic_2.4.26-3_alpha.deb
kernel-headers
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 04:57:40AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> At some point in the past, I wrote:
> >> The 2.6.8 release has been almost exclusively focused on stabilization.
> >> I highly recommend adopting as much of 2.6.8 as possible if not the
> >> whole delta between 2.6.7 and 2.6.8
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
kernel-image-2.4.26-alpha_2.4.26-3.dsc
kernel-image-2.4.26-alpha_2.4.26-3.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives w
(attached are lsmod's and dmesg's after the file in rcS.d was execed)
(by the way it looks like yenta is the pooee module)
-- lsmod --
Module Size Used by
af_packet 22376 1
eepro100 30700 0
snd_intel8x0m 20264 0
snd_intel8x0 3646
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686
Version: 2.6.7-2
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages kernel-image-
At some point in the past, I wrote:
>> The 2.6.8 release has been almost exclusively focused on stabilization.
>> I highly recommend adopting as much of 2.6.8 as possible if not the
>> whole delta between 2.6.7 and 2.6.8. If not incrementing the version
>> number after freeze is the primary constra
kernel-headers-2.6-generic_2.6.7-1_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.7-alpha/kernel-headers-2.6-generic_2.6.7-1_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-smp_2.6.7-1_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.7-alpha/kernel-headers-2.6-smp_2.6.7-1_alpha.deb
(new) kernel-headers-2.6.7-1-generic_2.6.
kernel-image-2.6.7-alpha_2.6.7-1_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.7-alpha_2.6.7-1.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.7-alpha_2.6.7-1.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.7-1_2.6.7-1_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-generic_2.6.7-1_alpha.deb
kernel-image-2.6-gene
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
kernel-image-2.6.7-alpha_2.6.7-1.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.7-alpha_2.6.7-1.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives withi
Hi,
just for info: I had exactly the same CRC errors, using a stock
(non-Debian) 2.6.7 kernel.
With a 2.6.8-rc2-bk9 kernel things work fine right now, no CRC
errors so far.
I attached some current config info.
Greetings, Bastian
--
,''`.Bastian Kleineidam . calvin (at) debian.org
: :' :
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386
Version: 2.6.7-2
Severity: minor
The conf file /etc/kernel-img.conf has this inside by default:
# Do not create symbolic links in /
do_symlinks = yes
As you can see, the comment says the symbolic links are not created but
the option below says they are crea
Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:50:02AM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
> > Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Would it be sufficient to provide the Makefile and
> > > kernel-headers.revision as sumlinks back to ../kernel-headers-2.4.26-1.
> >
> > I did that and i
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 11:13:23AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 06:02:19PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> > Package: kernel-source-2.4.26
> > Version: 2.4.26-4
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Subject says it all. The apply and unapply scripts doesn't work at
> > all.
Oing debian-release, as to get them in the loop of this discussion.
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 11:33:42AM +, Thomas Skybakmoen wrote:
> >> Like that the base freeze is today?
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 02:10:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, the fact that the kernels are or not part of
23 matches
Mail list logo
