Package: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.6-1-686-smp
Severity: normal
I run Debian Sarge with 2.6.6 on a 3GHz P4. The method used was
"apt-get install" and all dependencies were automatically resolved.
The kernel boots fine, but the session only lasts from 1 to 48 hours.
After that, w
Per Olofsson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 08:58 -0300, Robin Blondon wrote:
Under 2.6, when I have i82365 and orinoco_cs in /etc/modules,
yenta_socket is not loaded and it doesn't look like it tries to load it
(I checked boot messages, dmesg, and syslog) but it does attempt to load
memory_c
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 19:57:01 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Package: kernel Severity: normal
> To my understanding, kernel-headers are to be used in compiling
> kernel modules. However, quite a few modules require
> $KERNELSOURCE/drivers, others try to execute `make modules` i
Package: kernel-source-2.6.7
Version: 2.6.7-2
Severity: important
During compilation (with make-kpkg) I got this error:
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/i386/power
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:57:01 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
[...]
>
> Either I am doing something wrong, or the kernel-headers packages
> are really not needed anymore.
>
They most certainly are needed. Modules should be unpacked in
/usr/src/modules, and then one can do a `make-kpkg
--append_to
package: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686
version: 2.6.6-1
package: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686
version: 2.6.6-2
package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686
version: 2.6.7-1
hi,
when i try to load the module speedstep_centrino it fails with a segmentation
fault. the kernel versions prior and including kernel-image
#include
* martin f krafft [Mon, Jul 05 2004, 07:57:01PM]:
> To my understanding, kernel-headers are to be used in compiling
> kernel modules. However, quite a few modules require
> $KERNELSOURCE/drivers,
If they don't describe it in the manual, file bugs.
> others try to execute `make modules
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 07:57:01PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Severity: normal
>
> To my understanding, kernel-headers are to be used in compiling
> kernel modules. However, quite a few modules require
> $KERNELSOURCE/drivers, others try to execute `make modules` in the
> KS
Dear Matthew
Thank you very much! You where right, I had a fault in one of the memory
blocks.
Kim
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Kernel fault
> On Mon, Jul 05, 200
Package: kernel
Severity: normal
To my understanding, kernel-headers are to be used in compiling
kernel modules. However, quite a few modules require
$KERNELSOURCE/drivers, others try to execute `make modules` in the
KSRC directory, and yet others only work with make-kpkg, which
requires the kerne
Hi All
I am sorry but I am not quite sure if this is the
right list.
I have been runing a debian system for about two
years. There has never been any problems with stability. In the last month or so
I keep getting bugs. Sometimes when transfering big files to the debian system
via samba,
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 10:29:34PM +0200, Kim wrote:
> eax: 014c ebx: c130aaf0 ecx: 1000 edx: 0001038f
Single bit set.
> Does anyone know what this is?
Bad RAM. Run memtest86 to confirm, but you've got all the classic
symptoms of a
Hi All
I am sorry but I am not quite sure if this is the
right list.
I have been runing a debian system for about two
years. There has never been any problems with stability. In the last month or so
I keep getting bugs. Sometimes when transfering big files to the debian system
via samb
tags 257373 + pending
thanks
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-02 17:26]:
> This trivial patch adds support for user mode linux ubd devices to mkinitrd.
Applied in SVN, thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 257373 + pending
Bug#257373: Support for UML ubd devices
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.7-1
Severity: normal
During the installion I get this message:
Setting up kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp (2.6.7-1) ...
cpio: /etc/modprobe.conf: No such file or directory
cpio: /lib/modules/modprobe.conf: No such file or directory
In mid june there
Sorry to insist, but don't anybody know if it's difficult to include
the patch I sent to the current debian 2.6 kernel? I think it's not a
big issue, since the patch is tiny and localized. What's wrong with
it?
Anybody has something to say?
Thanks,
Bruno.
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:13:28 -0300, Bruno
On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 22:43 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> I would suggest a solution as follows :
>
> 1) the XF86Config file is debconf managed : We query the database, inform
> the user with a low priority debconf question if it is set to psaux,
> and change it for him. This means a prior
Package: kernel-source-2.6.7
Version: 2.6.7-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
There's a bug n the kernel that doesn't permit the correct
identification of the chipset used by the AGPGART driver if this is a
VIA chipset. (fo example KT600 identified as CLE266 )
This bug is solved in a newer version
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 12:19:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 22:43 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > I would suggest a solution as follows :
> >
> > 1) the XF86Config file is debconf managed : We query the database, inform
> > the user with a low priority debconf qu
It is probably nothing. Still, when compiling 2.6.7-2, I get:
drivers/char/istallion.c: In function `istallion_module_exit':
drivers/char/istallion.c:854: warning: too few arguments for format
I believe that with earlier 2.6 sources there was a similar message, and
maybe some other warn
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 10:32:21AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > This means that 2.6 could be made the default on :
> >
> > alpha, i386, ia64, powerpc and sparc64 (mmm, do we have sparc64
> > kernels ?) and amd64. And the de
Will the kernel-patch-debian package restored to what it used to be,
at least until sarge release?
--
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then
you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I
have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then e
23 matches
Mail list logo
