Hi all,
I have been working 12/7 for 2 weeks and 5 days on this problem with the
help of #debian irc chat. My problem is I can't get my server ( HP DL140)
with Broadcom BCM1504 nics to work with a 2.6 kernel of any kind. It is a
dual XEON 2.4 with 2 gig of ddr ecc ram (if that matters). I h
Accepted:
initrd-tools_0.1.70.dsc
to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.70.dsc
initrd-tools_0.1.70.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.70.tar.gz
initrd-tools_0.1.70_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.70_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists
tag 249641 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 13:28:50 -0300
Source: initrd-tools
Binary: initrd-tools
Architecture: source all
initrd-tools_0.1.70_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initrd-tools_0.1.70.dsc
initrd-tools_0.1.70.tar.gz
initrd-tools_0.1.70_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Adam Majer wrote:
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Adam Majer wrote:
As to the non-free binary blobs, these are to be moved to non-free.
There should be an automatic 'non-free removal patches' (not part of
the actual debian source).
To follow the X Strike Force model (which seems to work) I suggest
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > No, theres lots of code in kernelspace that assumes a partitioned disk
>> > has a block of minors. Use a volume manager instead
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No, theres lots of code in kernelspace that assumes a partitioned disk
> > has a block of minors. Use a volume manager instead of traditional
> > partitions if you need more th
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:11:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> As for 3 this is a general problem of scsi disks. Wouldn't it be
>> possible for the code that scans partitions to allocate device nodes
>> dynamically for partitions >15 so tha
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:11:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> As for 3 this is a general problem of scsi disks. Wouldn't it be
> possible for the code that scans partitions to allocate device nodes
> dynamically for partitions >15 so that users with devfs or udev active
> would get additi
Hi,
recently we (debian-amd64) have gotten some problem reports for SATA.
Depending on the kernel version, how it is configured and how the
initrd is build an SATA disk shows up as /dev/hde or /dev/sda.
This has three consequences:
1. going back and forth between an old and new kernel means chan
10 matches
Mail list logo
