On Wednesday 12 January 2005 15:20, Derek Broughton wrote:
> Here's a suggestion to people defending him. Just ignore the whole
> waste of bandwidth.
I am not defending one particular person, I am defending the right to
be allowed to ask simple questions. Debian-kde is not a hacker
centric mail
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 17:19, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Are your packages still built with gcc 2.95, or have you moved to gcc
> 3.2?
Excuse my ignorance, but is it not possible to recompile a successful run for
2.95 under 3.2 for somebody with "lisence to sid"? I have myself been in
agony due t
On Thursday 13 March 2003 01:08, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 March 2003 21:27, Randy Kramer wrote:
...
> > I'm going on record here saying I don't want to be part of that
> > statistic. If you tell me what your agenda is, I might or might not be
> > willing to support it.
>
> You're a
On Friday 14 March 2003 09:44, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> For KDE surveys, debian is probably
> one of the best platforms due to that, and you can also further elaborate
> on the problems that users experience with debian as a desktop system.
Amen to that, /except/ the problem that some of the important
On Friday 14 March 2003 09:47, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> No, but you're running into a different type of problem. KDE 1 was using Qt
> 1 which is not free software, hence the reason why KDE 1 wasn't part of
> debian.
Now that is an argument I understand. Limited by the freedom of the tools you
are usi
On Saturday 15 March 2003 16:51, Thomas Fiedler wrote:
> OK, dann werd ich dann mal loslegen.
> Rein theoreitisch dürfte das ja ziemlich leicht gehen.
> Eine paar kleinere Fragen noch. --sorry.
Please Thomas, how about subscribing to debian-user-german maillist on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-
On Saturday 15 March 2003 20:19, Thomas Fiedler wrote:
> HEY Muß das sein? -Bleib mal cool -OK
> Wo steht das das ne englische Liste ist.
> Mag sein, das dort englisch geschrieben wird aber deswegen wird es wohl
> keine wirklich stören wenn ich da nun mal auf Deutsch schreibe -- Ich kann
> nich
On Friday 21 March 2003 00:14, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> What about copying and pasting the question into
> http://babelfish.altavista.com into English, responding in English, and
> offering a link to translate?? Or try to post in both English and the
> language of the questioner?
This isn't abo
Hi,
My kmail use 5 lines of uninteresting info that it can not verify the key of
this email. I have no interest in the identity of the message author and
would like to turn off these messages.
--
Svenn
On Thursday 03 July 2003 19:53, Andre Schaefer wrote:
> Especially try to spot nautilus, as this draws the desktop background,
> doesn't it? At least it was resposible for similar effects on my system
> recently.
Ok, I have nautilus in very many copies even after a normal reboot. What did I
do th
On Sunday 06 July 2003 10:15, Peter Nome wrote:
> when I issue "kfmclient openProfile webbrowsing" I get "ERROR: Couldn't
> start konqueror from konqueror.desktop: KDEInit could not launch 'kfmexec'"
> -- any suggestions?
Reporting that trying to start konqueror from button menu give following err
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 13:55, Randy Kramer wrote:
> Couldn't help but comment -- that's the kind of answer I like, one that
> takes you to a good source of information and helps people get at least one
> idea of what wikis are good for.
The wiki is good, but they notoriously edit the page so
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 19:09, Mickael Marchand wrote:
> we are on the way to add kvim in vim's sources package.
A very wise desicion, kind thoughts coming your way. I have always had lots of
extra work with dpkg --force-all with kvim and vim on my computers, and this
now will have an end.
-
On Monday 06 October 2003 19:16, kosh wrote:
> I disagree with this idea and I don't want the addresses munged. It is very
> useful being able to reply to someone and I will just hit reply to reply to
> someone. If the mail bounces I won't waste any more time contacting them.
> Overall not one list
On Monday 06 October 2003 19:46, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> Well, that doesn't neccesarily mean that the email-addresses must not be
> munged. I don't know if this is supported by any mailing-list software,
> but how about just munging the addresses in the archive? I guess
> address-collectors don't su
On Monday 06 October 2003 19:47, Antiphon wrote:
> Munging does not mean only removing the domain. It can be simply a matter
> of making [EMAIL PROTECTED] into joe at user dot or dot jp. That's not too
> hard for someone to figure out.
A proper regular expression can recognize the dots and ats and
On Monday 06 October 2003 20:00, kosh wrote:
> If I have to figure it out then I won't reply. I get thousands of email a
> day and reply to some of them to help people. There are so many that I
> could reply to anyone that makes my life just a little more difficult will
> not get a reply. Also do y
On Monday 06 October 2003 20:26, Antiphon wrote:
> You could also munge the @ sign and around it as I said in the previous
> example. However, using only the entity way I outlined above would be more
> convenient for someone like you who wants clickability.
It would be even better to use java.grap
On Monday 06 October 2003 21:12, kosh wrote:
> As I already pointed out the existing email harvesters already do this by
> default. You are not defeating anything. I think you overestimate how much
> time it takes to parse stuff like that. It problems takes more time to
> gather the data over the n
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 17:18, David Bishop wrote:
> So, if you think kate's code folding abilities leave something to be
> desired, or kdevelop would be a lot nicer with objc support, or k3b could
> use a way to automatically convert videos for vcds, then go forth and do!
> And absolutely the
Hi,
I dist-upgraded my sid about the time when the first kde 3.3 packages showed
up and I noted a dramatic reduction in speed when browsing the internet with
konqueror. I first expected it to be something wrong with my dns, but a
windows and macos machine on the same net had no problem.
With t
On Monday 30 August 2004 21:32, Felix Homann wrote:
> I've already filed a bug report, see
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266742
>
> Maybe you would like to comment on it.
I read the bug report and did not understand very much about it other than the
fact that there is a swi
On Monday 30 August 2004 21:32, Felix Homann wrote:
> Maybe you would like to comment on it.
I find that knode also use very long time to get articles from a server after
a time has passed. (Seems to be some kind of a time out on the IP number it
got from the dns.) If I take my time to write an
On Friday 07 January 2005 17:28, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> Haven't been able to locate anything useful. Also not on
> bugs.kde.org. If it was happening more often (regularly), I'd think
> it might be related to name resolution in some manner. But since I
> see it so seldomly, I don't think this i
On Thursday 06 January 2005 10:24, jianan wrote:
> After visiting some sensitive sites, you are advised to 'clear the
> cache' for security reason. In IE, this involves clearing files in
> a folder, and there's a button for that
>
> How is this handle in Konqueror?
This was a very simple question
25 matches
Mail list logo
