Re: kmail corrupts emails [solved]

Derek Broughton wrote: > Randy Kramer wrote: > > >>On Tuesday 27 September 2005 09:27 am, Derek Broughton wrote: >> >>>Why do you think Maildir would perform worse for folders with thousands >>>of >>>emails? Everything I've read suggests it will perform better - and more >>>reliably. >> >>First

Re: kmail corrupts emails [solved]

Randy Kramer wrote: > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 01:44 pm, Pete Jewell wrote: > >>However, ReiserFS is *much* more efficient when you have thousands of >>files in one directory, because it uses a hashing algorithm to determine >>where the required file is (or starts) in

Re: kmail corrupts emails [solved]

Derek Broughton wrote: > Pete Jewell wrote: > > >>However, ReiserFS is *much* more efficient when you have thousands of >>files in one directory, because it uses a hashing algorithm to determine >>where the required file is (or starts) in the filesystem. This

Re: KDE 3.4.2 backport now?

Klaus Becker wrote: > Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 22:49, Mikhail Ramendik a écrit : > >>Klaus Becker wrote: >> http://mirror.debianforum.de/kde-3.4.2/ >>> >>>I tried it and I got: >> >>This is the output of what? >> >> >>>grave bugs of kdm (4:3.4.1-1 -> 4:3.4.2-2) >>> #324018 - kdm does not ha