On Sunday 01 April 2001 12:02, paul taylor wrote:
> I am new to debian. I originally got potato with gnome and now have KDE2
> which is my window of choice.
> From what I can see if I delete gnome I no longer have midnight commander.
> I used to use mc with kde when I ran suse 6.1.
> I want to run
On Sunday 01 April 2001 09:50, Chris L. Mason wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's a couple sites that konqueror is having problems with:
>
> http://www.ati.com/
Works fine here (KDE2.1.1). Do you have Java and Java script turned on?
On Sunday 01 April 2001 11:35, Chris L. Mason wrote:
> No I had javascript turned off. I had tried it previously with Javascript
> on (at work) and it still doesn't display properly. With javascript on,
> there are a bunch of short black bars at the left with no text. Also, the
> main page is m
On Sunday 01 April 2001 12:13, Chris L. Mason wrote:
> Okay, at work I have a laptop running at 1024x768 using 16 bits of colour.
> At home I'm running at 1600x1200 also 16 bits. I tried running 1280x1024
> at 24 bits, same problem on all configurations.
>
> Also, at home I have the latest Debian
On Sunday 01 April 2001 12:32, Jon Pennington wrote:
> How do you have your browser identifier strings set?
I don't undersstand. Could you be more specific?
On Thursday 05 April 2001 11:34, Shawn Garbett wrote:
> I've just got KDE 2.1.1 up and working. I keep here the buzz about
> TrueType fonts.
>
> deselect's only complaint is that xfs-tt is not configured properly.
>
> First off, how do I determine if my video card supports this.
Go to the manufact
On Thursday 05 April 2001 14:21, Rogerio Brito wrote:
> As far as I understand, anti-aliasing only works with scalable
> fonts in general and true type fonts in particular. This I can
> understand and is acceptable.
>
> What *is* a problem in my eyes, though is that if you
On Tuesday 10 April 2001 18:29, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> As it stands now I
> have alot on my plate with new X4.0.3 packages that require an update
> to how QT is built
Which QT will you be targeting first off for this? Qt 2.3 or 3.0? Just
curious as I know 3.0 was just announced yesterday, no
On Tuesday 10 April 2001 19:18, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > Which QT will you be targeting first off for this? Qt 2.3 or 3.0?
> > Just curious as I know 3.0 was just announced yesterday, not trying
> > to be pushy. TIA.
>
> probably 2.3 to begin with as it's been doing pretty good and 3.0
> last I
On Tuesday 10 April 2001 19:24, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > Which QT will you be targeting first off for this? Qt 2.3 or 3.0?
> > Just curious as I know 3.0 was just announced yesterday, not trying
> > to be pushy. TIA.
>
> ok...I didn't think I saw the announcement...where did you see this?
Sorr
On Tuesday 10 April 2001 20:20, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> ahhhok...well 3.0 was not announced...qt 3.0 preview seems to
> have been. that's another term for beta. :)
>
> either way...it's not on their ftp site. so I guess it's just
> "announced" and not "released"... :)
I've really got to slo
On Saturday 14 April 2001 01:36, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> Ok...just got done uploading the latest -pretty-much-alpha1-packages-
Just to confirm, which kdevelop would be appropriate to use with this
almost alpha 2.2? I was thinking of getting today's kdevelop snapshot
from kdevelop.org, but was
On Saturday 14 April 2001 01:36, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> Ok...just got done uploading the latest -pretty-much-alpha1-packages-
> to
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/%7Erkrusty/ kde2.2/$(ARCH)/
> deb http://pandora.debian.org/%7Erkrusty/ kde2.2/$(ARCH)/
I'm a bit concerned about the fact that
On Saturday 14 April 2001 12:09, David Bishop wrote:
> > I'm a bit concerned about the fact that 55 packages are not
> > upgraded and nothing seems to have been done.
>
> Take any one of those and do a apt-get install packagename. That
> will bring up apt and it will go out and either install wh
On Sunday 22 April 2001 11:50, John Gay wrote:
> On Sunday 22 April 2001 13:20, Regnat Nikolaus wrote:
> > I´m also searching for the C++ reference which is missing. Someone
> > out there who solved this problem?
>
> You need to get the C/C++ reference from somewhere. I've got a copy,
> but it's 1.
Could someone please tell me if the iso's on ftp://kde.tdyc.com contain
full source code as well as binaries? If they do, it would be
worthwhile to dl and burn to cd as a reference. If not, apt-get is fine
for updates. TIA.
On Tuesday 24 April 2001 17:55, Rick Cook wrote:
> Enclosed is a copy of the announcement for the latest image. It
> includes source packages.
Thanks, Rick. The list looks pretty complete. CDRs are cheap these
days, so I'll get it.
> If you are wanting to save download time,
Not so much: more
On Monday 21 May 2001 19:40, Robert Tilley wrote:
> A few days ago it seemed that kde.tdyc.com fell off the internet. My
> sources.list had to be changed to mirrors.
>
> What happened?
Do you have a url for the mirror list? Thanks.
Thanks, Jan, I've passed on the mirror list to the Libranet (Debian
Linux) user's mailing list as several people have been asking for
mirror sites.
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 01:30, Jan Heyelmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 May 2001 05:12, Doug Byfield wrote:
> > Do you have a url
John Gay wrote:
I realise this is probably a stupid question, but . . .
I just installed Kylix on my system but it refuses to start with the
following error:
LC_ALL is set to C. Can't start Kylix.
This is a fairly common question on newsgroups.borland.com kylix install
group. Just add the follow
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 07:55 pm, Philippe Plamondon wrote:
> Could some people try to access www.distrowatch.com with konqueror
> 2.2.2-14 (the latest). It crashes every time on my up-to-date woody.
I just installed kde and konqueror from sid 10 minutes ago (8:43 PM PST) and
have no trouble
21 matches
Mail list logo
