6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
Or has it been replaced by something else ?
Thank you,
Michal
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:39:12 +0100
Antoine Pardigon wrote:
Hello Antoine,
what's the status now ? (not frozen anymore ?)
6.4.0 entered unstable today.
On 17/02/2020 10:30, Michal BULIK wrote:
>
> 6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
> Or has it been replaced by something else ?
>
> Thank you,
> Michal
They were split to a new source by KDE, and made part of KDE
applications/release-service.
The new source
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:30:12AM +0100, Michal BULIK wrote:
>
> 6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
> Or has it been replaced by something else ?
Separate kipi-plugins 4:19.12.2-1 source package is in NEW.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 11:30:12 +0100
Michal BULIK wrote:
Hello Michal,
>6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared
>? Or has it been replaced by something else ?
You don't need kipi-plugins any more, also, kipi-plugins-common can go,
too. In fact, upgrading (here, at
Rik Mills ha scritto:
> On 17/02/2020 10:30, Michal BULIK wrote:
>>
>> 6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
>> Or has it been replaced by something else ?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Michal
>
> They were split to a new source by KDE, and made part of KDE
> applications
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:55:27AM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> You don't need kipi-plugins any more, also, kipi-plugins-common can go,
> too. In fact, upgrading (here, at least) required its removal. A log
> out and back in and all the export options still exist.
Do you mean one should install di
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:05:01PM +0100, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Also, please note that they have been kept around after digikam totally
> dropped them just for compatibility purpose, but they are basically replaced
> by the Purpose framework also in the other projects. See also:
>
> https://mail.
Thanks Rik,
I see they're now optional (digikam 6.4 depends no more on them)
and hopefully they'll land in sid in a not so distant future ...
Michal
On 17/02/2020 10:30, Michal BULIK wrote:
6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
Or has it been replaced by s
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:12:26 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
Hello Andrey,
>Do you mean one should install digikam instead of kipi-plugins now if
>they need export from KDE apps?
All I see here is that, despite the removal of kipi-plugins, digikam
still has the export options.
Others have more
Brad Rogers - 17.02.20, 12:40:42 CET:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:12:26 +0500
> Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
[…]
> >Do you mean one should install digikam instead of kipi-plugins now if
> >they need export from KDE apps?
>
> All I see here is that, despite the removal of kipi-plugins, digikam
> still h
Hi,
I read many times "the Debian KDE"-packaging team to be short of resources.
Being a KDE-fan I am very much willing to help and started to lean about
Debian packaging.
While I am studying Debian packaging I like to understand why KDE packaging
needs so much effort. For example the LibreOffice
Hi Luc!
El lun., 17 feb. 2020 09:54, Luc Castermans
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I read many times "the Debian KDE"-packaging team to be short of
> resources. Being a KDE-fan I am very much willing to help and started to
> lean about Debian packaging.
>
Great!
While I am studying Debian packaging I l
> Since their usage in a 5.14.x environment is not
> a tested scenario, and thus they might cause issues, my recommendation
> is to avoid upgrading them for few days (so together with the rest of
> Plasma 5.17).
Would it be better then to make them as a tied migration to avoid
regressions in testi
13 matches
Mail list logo
