On Monday, April 3, 2017 1:07:31 PM CEST fradev wrote:
> These are the effects of having non essential packages listed as
> dependencies in general-desktop-environment-oriented-meta-packages. IMHO
> it is not good for the users and it is not good for the sysadmins.
I, of course, agree with the ab
On 03/04/17 13:07:31 CEST, fradev wrote:
> >$ sudo apt autoremove kmail
Sorry, there is a typo. The output that I posted was generated by
"$ sudo apt remove kmail", not "autoremove".
On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 3:10:55 PM PDT fradev wrote:
> On 03/04/17 13:07:31 CEST, fradev wrote:
> > >$ sudo apt autoremove kmail
>
> Sorry, there is a typo. The output that I posted was generated by
> "$ sudo apt remove kmail", not "autoremove".
I agree, but the original topic was about whic
On 05/04/17 11:43:55 CEST, Shawn Sörbom wrote:
> > Sorry, there is a typo. The output that I posted was generated by
> > "$ sudo apt remove kmail", not "autoremove".
>
> I agree, but the original topic was about which packages shouldn't be
> included by default. Couldn't this be solved by changing
On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 11:56:43 PM CEST fradev wrote:
> On 05/04/17 11:43:55 CEST, Shawn Sörbom wrote:
> > > Sorry, there is a typo. The output that I posted was generated by
> > > "$ sudo apt remove kmail", not "autoremove".
> >
> > I agree, but the original topic was about which packages sh
5 matches
Mail list logo
