Re: KDE 4.10

2013-04-17 Thread Aribert Biel
On Tuesday 16 April 2013 14:44:52 Diane Trout wrote: > Try running akonadiconsole and looking at the > > On the agents tab make sure there's an Akonadi Nepomuk Feeder, that its > online and says something about indexing completed. > > I find that it sometimes disables itself. > > The Error mess

Re: Back to KDEPIM 1 and KDE SC 4.8.4 due to repeated mail data loss

2013-04-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Diane Trout: > On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 00:07:40 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I am back to KDEPIM 1 aka 4.4.11 and KDE SC 4.8.4 from Sid. > > > > Reason? Data losses. > > > > [Akonadi] [Bug 318227] New: Data loss on restarting Akonadi to get i

Re: Back to KDEPIM 1 and KDE SC 4.8.4 due to repeated mail data loss

2013-04-17 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Wednesday, 2013-04-17, Diane Trout wrote: > Did you check to see if the message was still on the server after it > vanished locally? > > I wonder if they started assuming local is a cache? All caching is handled by Akonadi server, all content in file based resources, e.g. maildir resource, is

Re: KDE 4.10

2013-04-17 Thread Aribert Biel
Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013, 07:43:18 schrieb Aribert Biel: > On Tuesday 16 April 2013 14:44:52 Diane Trout wrote: > > Try running akonadiconsole and looking at the > > > > On the agents tab make sure there's an Akonadi Nepomuk Feeder, that its > > online and says something about indexing complet

Re: KDE 4.10

2013-04-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2013-04-17, Aribert Biel wrote: > I downgraded kdepim 4:4.10.2-1 from experimental back to kdepim > 4:4.10.2-0ubuntu3 from ubuntu raring. Sorry, you just voided your warranty. Do *not* mix debian and ubuntu packages. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: Back to KDEPIM 1 and KDE SC 4.8.4 due to repeated mail data loss

2013-04-17 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi, Alle mercoledì 17 aprile 2013, Martin Steigerwald ha scritto: > I am back to KDEPIM 1 aka 4.4.11 and KDE SC 4.8.4 from Sid. Not that I'm asking you to try again, but at least reading the bug reports you opened I see things like: | kmail 4:4.10.2-0r4 newer than version in archive so the versi

Re: Back to KDEPIM 1 and KDE SC 4.8.4 due to repeated mail data loss

2013-04-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2013-04-17, Pino Toscano wrote: >| kmail 4:4.10.2-0r4 newer than version in archive In this case, it is packages provided by me for early testing. They don't differ except a bit of typos (and workarounds for a well known aptitude vs sbuild issue) from the packages I later pushed to experimenta

Re: Back to KDEPIM 1 and KDE SC 4.8.4 due to repeated mail data loss

2013-04-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > On Wednesday, 2013-04-17, Diane Trout wrote: > > Did you check to see if the message was still on the server after it > > vanished locally? > > > > I wonder if they started assuming local is a cache? > > All caching is handled by Akonadi server

Re: KDE 4.10

2013-04-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Sune Vuorela: > On 2013-04-17, Aribert Biel wrote: > > I downgraded kdepim 4:4.10.2-1 from experimental back to kdepim > > 4:4.10.2-0ubuntu3 from ubuntu raring. > > Sorry, you just voided your warranty. Do not mix debian and ubuntu > packages. While I agree

Re: KDE 4.10

2013-04-17 Thread Diane Trout
> BUT: I noticed the Language package kde-l10-de was still from experimental > and lacked the translations for kmail to german, So kmail menues were in > English. > > So I downgraded also the language pack to the version from ubuntu > containing the German translations for kmail. And after a r

unsuscribe

2013-04-17 Thread Jesús Benjamin Yam Aguilar
  Informatica Plus software libre, diseño y mas www.informaticaplus.com.mxDiseño web, alojamiento y registro de dominios www.informaticaplus.mx

Re: Back to KDEPIM 1 and KDE SC 4.8.4 due to repeated mail data loss

2013-04-17 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Wednesday, 2013-04-17, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > > On Wednesday, 2013-04-17, Diane Trout wrote: > > > Did you check to see if the message was still on the server after it > > > vanished locally? > > > > > > I wonder if they started assuming

Re: KDE SC 4.10

2013-04-17 Thread Markus Raab
Hello! Julian wrote: > Having a stable and tested operating system and its core packages is > important and packages end up in stable that have gone through the > rigmarole. I fully agree! > Rolling releases of individual packages are everywhere (downloadable > .deb packages or little source rep

Re: KDE SC 4.10

2013-04-17 Thread Julian
On 18/04/13 02:46, Markus Raab wrote: > Hello! > > Julian wrote: >> Having a stable and tested operating system and its core packages is >> important and packages end up in stable that have gone through the >> rigmarole. > > I fully agree! > >> Rolling releases of individual packages are everywh

Re: KDE SC 4.10

2013-04-17 Thread Diane Trout
> People desperate for 4.10 are installing experimental, which is crazy, > experimental is the crucible of package pain and will always be that > way, but it is unnecessary for alot of applications out there, including > KDE. > > I'd rather test application bugs than package dependency bugs in >