Am Dienstag, 30. März 2010 schrieb Michael Schuerig:
> Now, I'm wondering, is this something I ought to report as a bug against
> strigi or is the problem with Nepomuk for not logging abnormal
> termination of child processes? Or is it pdftotext for apparently
> producing invalid UTF-8 from a PDF
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:25:16PM +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> On sekmadienis 28 Kovas 2010 21:40:40 Marc Haber wrote:
> > > KDE SC 4.4.2 packages have been uploaded to the repository at http://qt-
> > > kde.debian.net/. KDE SC 4.4.1 users, who set up /etc/apt/preferences
> > > properly, shoul
Hello,
On trečiadienis 31 Kovas 2010 10:53:35 Marc Haber wrote:
> > /etc/apt/preferences snippet on http://qt-kde.debian.net/
>
> Are you talking about 4.4.2 release, or 4.4.2rc1?
>
> $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/qt-kde-experimental.list
> deb http://qt-kde.debian.net/debian experimental-snapsh
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:27:53AM +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> I really don't get the question. -0rcX is debian revision, not upstream
> revision. revision is -0rcX in order to be lower than the future official -1.
You are correct. Next time I'll try to actually wake up before asking
stupid
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 08.19:37 Sune Vuorela wrote:
[packaging kde api docs]
> Patches will be considered
JFTR: Since the API docs is easily downloadable (in contrast to the docs for
some Python based software, which is only online but not as zip/tar), I'm
happy with the status quo and won't
Am Mittwoch, 31. März 2010 schrieb Adrian von Bidder:
> The KDE API documentation is currently not provided in Debian packages but
> is available for both download and on-line browsing at http://api.kde.org/.
> ===
>
> Either this is enough (for people like me) or it will spark a wishlist bug
> w
On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Carsten Pfeiffer wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 30. März 2010 schrieb Michael Schuerig:
> > Now, I'm wondering, is this something I ought to report as a bug
> > against strigi or is the problem with Nepomuk for not logging
> > abnormal termination of child processes? Or is it pdf
Am Dienstag 30 März 2010 schrieb Michael Schuerig:
> On Sunday 28 March 2010, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> > Apparently, a new
> > /usr/bin/nepomukservicestub nepomukstrigiservice
> > is started every 8 or 9 minutes. from ~/.xsession-errors I can't see
> > anything that indicates that these processes
On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag 30 März 2010 schrieb Michael Schuerig:
> > On Sunday 28 March 2010, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> > > Apparently, a new
> > > /usr/bin/nepomukservicestub nepomukstrigiservice
> > > is started every 8 or 9 minutes. from ~/.xsession-erro
Am Mittwoch 31 März 2010 schrieb Michael Schuerig:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Carsten Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 30. März 2010 schrieb Michael Schuerig:
> > > Now, I'm wondering, is this something I ought to report as a bug
> > > against strigi or is the problem with Nepomuk for not loggin
Am Mittwoch 31 März 2010 schrieb Michael Schuerig:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Dienstag 30 März 2010 schrieb Michael Schuerig:
> > > On Sunday 28 March 2010, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> > > > Apparently, a new
> > > > /usr/bin/nepomukservicestub nepomukstrigiservice
11 matches
Mail list logo
