I continue to be stumped by USB storage devices in KDE. Only once with some
older version of Knoppix did a USB stick appear automatically on the desktop
when plugged in. I don't need this, but I do need at least to know under
which name the device can be mounted. Even without other SCSI devices,
I continue to be stumped by USB storage devices in KDE. Only once with some
older version of Knoppix did a USB stick appear automatically on the desktop
when plugged in. I don't need this, but I do need at least to know under
which name the device can be mounted. Even without other SCSI devices,
> I continue to be stumped by USB storage devices in KDE. Only once with some
> older version of Knoppix did a USB stick appear automatically on the desktop
> when plugged in. I don't need this, but I do need at least to know under
> which name the device can be mounted. Even without other SCSI
Well, I have done lots of Googling myself for the last few months. Most
post started ok, but has no solution to it. Some post has no reply. I
have tried all sorts of thing, I have also libdvdcss, but nothing
worked (for all types of DVD). I have a feeling it is a faulty drive.
Is there a way to
On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 20:25 +1000, larinia wrote:
> Well, I have done lots of Googling myself for the last few months.
OK, that's great!
> Most post started ok, but has no solution to it. Some post has no
> reply.
Yeah I noticed. But - several of the posts that I saw led to faulty
hardware.
Am Sonntag, 18. September 2005 11:03 schrieb Theo Schmidt:
> I continue to be stumped by USB storage devices in KDE. Only once with some
> older version of Knoppix did a USB stick appear automatically on the
> desktop when plugged in. I don't need this, but I do need at least to know
> under which
Thanks Dave, I'll give them a try and see how it goes, otherwise I will
re-install wondows (last resort). The next computer I buy won't be a
laptop for sure!
Larinia
Is there a way to prove it is the drive that is faulty?
There probably is, cos I use a desktop pc, and
On Sunday 18 September 2005 07:39, larinia was heard to say:
> Thanks Dave, I'll give them a try and see how it goes,
> otherwise I will re-install wondows (last resort). The next
> computer I buy won't be a laptop for sure!
>
> Larinia
Mine, also, is a laptop. Unless I can get the problem to reoc
On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 08:11 -0400, Curt Howland wrote:
> On Sunday 18 September 2005 07:39, larinia was heard to say:
> > Thanks Dave, I'll give them a try and see how it goes,
> > otherwise I will re-install wondows (last resort). The next
> > computer I buy won't be a laptop for sure!
> >
> > La
I had a similar question maybe ten days ago and it is now working
flawlessly. I have:
Linux 2.6.12
udev
pmount
hal
KDE 3.4.2
All I had to do was configure the desktop and select Behavior then the
Device icons tab and enable Show device icons. From there I selected
the ones I want to show. My C
Am Sonntag, 18. September 2005 14:11 schrieb Curt Howland:
> Worse, the warrantee specifies that if I install anything over
> the WinXP that the laptop came with, my hardware warrantee is
> void.
Hmm, vendors often write things that are not compliant with local law (they
try anyway), e.g. the abo
On Sunday 18 September 2005 08:53, Hendrik Sattler was heard to
say:
> Am Sonntag, 18. September 2005 14:11 schrieb Curt Howland:
> > Worse, the warrantee specifies that if I install anything
> > over the WinXP that the laptop came with, my hardware
> > warrantee is void.
>
> Hmm, vendors often wr
On Sunday 18 September 2005 15:26, Curt Howland wrote:
> > Hmm, vendors often write things that are not compliant with
> > local law (they try anyway), e.g. the above statement would
> > probably be meaningless in Germany.
>
> Quite likely. Governments do tend to interfere with freedom of
> contrac
Am Sonntag, 18. September 2005 12.32 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> > I continue to be stumped by USB storage devices in KDE...
>
> That's how I currently do this (Debian Etch with X and KDE from Sid):
> $ cat /proc/partitions
> [...]
>8 0 256000 sda
>8 1 255984 sda1
Thank you
Good sir, please, don't misunderstand me. I agree with you
completely, in theory.
However, just like people choosing to publish their works under
the GPL, the hardware manufacturer may specify any limitations
they wish. Opening the case, dropping it in water, for that
matter dropping it at all
On Sunday 18 September 2005 17:36, Curt Howland wrote:
> Good sir, please, don't misunderstand me. I agree with you
> completely, in theory.
Sorry. It is easy to get the wrong idea in a written discussion.
Anders
--
- Debian/Unstable - KDE 3.4.2 - KMail 1.8.2 -
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Sunday 18 September 2005 11:25, larinia wrote:
> Well, I have done lots of Googling myself for the last few months. Most
> post started ok, but has no solution to it. Some post has no reply. I
> have tried all sorts of thing, I have also libdvdcss, but nothing worked
> (for all types of DVD). I
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pmount -d /dev/sda1
> resolved /dev/sda1 to device /dev/sda1
> mount point to be used: /media/sda1
> no iocharset given, current locale encoding is ISO-8859-15
> Cleaning lock directory /var/lock/pmount/_dev_sda1
> device_whitelist: checking /etc/pmount.allow...
> device_whit
I've had a bunch of problems with Quanta in testing (etch), and have
learned that some of them may be solved in later versions. So I'm
interested in running Quanta 3.4, or even the soon to be 3.5 in
testing, which is currently at KDE 3.3.
There were messages about backports recently, but they, an
Ross Boylan wrote:
> Does it make any sense to think about building Quanta (or other KDE
> apps) in an earlier KDE environment, or is that just a bad idea?
The most simple way is to update to KDE 3.4.1 from this repository (add this
to /etc/apt/sources.list and then aptitude update;aptitude dist-u
I'm currently running kde 3.3.2 and XF86 on sid, and am planning on upgrading
to X.org. Is this safe to do now? Would it be better to first upgrade to kde
3.4 and then do the migration to X.org? (I've been delaying my kde upgrade
until koffice is available.) I also have installed ati's fglrx dri
> I'm currently running kde 3.3.2 and XF86 on sid, and am planning on upgrading
> to X.org. Is this safe to do now?
If there's not any untransitioned application that you _need_...
> Would it be better to first upgrade to kde
> 3.4 and then do the migration to X.org?
I'd upgrade to X.org f
If you plan to upgrade to x.org be sure to first uninstall fglrx driver
(it's for xfree), then install xorg, and last install fglrx driver for
xorg.
I use packages from
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
A last note: with my mobile radeon 9700 fglrx 8.16.20
Am Sonntag, 18. September 2005 21:34 schrieb Petr Baláš:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pmount -d /dev/sda1
> > resolved /dev/sda1 to device /dev/sda1
> > mount point to be used: /media/sda1
> > no iocharset given, current locale encoding is ISO-8859-15
> > Cleaning lock directory /var/lock/pmount/_dev_s
On Sunday 18 September 2005 21:44, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I'm currently running kde 3.3.2 and XF86 on sid, and am planning on
> > upgrading to X.org. Is this safe to do now?
>
> If there's not any untransitioned application that you _need_...
>
> > Would it be better to first upgrade to kde
> >
Op zondag 18 september 2005 14:47, schreef Nate Bargmann:
> I had a similar question maybe ten days ago and it is now working
> flawlessly. I have:
>
> Linux 2.6.12
> udev
> pmount
> hal
> KDE 3.4.2
>
> All I had to do was configure the desktop and select Behavior then the
> Device icons tab and e
On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 13:09 -0600, Tim Folger wrote:
> I'm currently running kde 3.3.2 and XF86 on sid, and am planning on upgrading
> to X.org. Is this safe to do now? Would it be better to first upgrade to kde
> 3.4 and then do the migration to X.org? (I've been delaying my kde upgrade
> until
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 01:04 +1000, Theo Schmidt wrote:
>
> Thanks, David.
>
> Could the uhci problems below be part of my problems?
>
> Sep 18 09:50:58 tbox pci.agent[543]: eepro100: already loaded
> Sep 18 09:50:58 tbox pci.agent[543]: e100: can't be loaded
> Sep 18 09:50:59 tbox pc
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 18. September 2005 14:11 schrieb Curt Howland:
>
>>Worse, the warrantee specifies that if I install anything over
>>the WinXP that the laptop came with, my hardware warrantee is
>>void.
>
>
> Hmm, vendors often write things that are not compliant with local l
> I'd upgrade to X.org first, and then KDE.
>If you plan to upgrade to x.org be sure to first uninstall fglrx driver
(it's for xfree), then install xorg, and last install fglrx driver for xorg.
I use packages from
> I second this.
Thanks very much for the advice.
Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
* Henk Loke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Sep 18 15:28 -0500]:
> There is no need to right click, (double) left click and it gets mounted and
> opened automagical...
True, but I don't normally use Konquerer. I'm still a Midnight
Commander fan.
- Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB
31 matches
Mail list logo
