Re: Kvim broken in alioth

2005-05-30 Thread Rigo Wenning
I agree, that making yet another editor looks like more balkanization. I already use kate most of the time as starting up gvim in KDE takes a lot of time and editing large files makes a lot of probs. The only thing missing in Kate is the ex-functionality, kind of integrated sed being able to ad

Photoshop, Windows, Office. CHEAP.

2005-05-30 Thread Josephine
75% Off for All New Software. http://dshti.2roh5j2dhck9hl2.whuzgdaid.com The effect of one upright individual is incalculable. It is easier to forgive an enemy than to forgive a friend. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Re: Kvim broken in alioth

2005-05-30 Thread Matej Cepl
Rigo Wenning wrote: > And no, I can't maintain it, as I'm not a programmer nor do I have > sufficient time. So I was just looking for a qt-GUI for vi. But it > seems that editor-maintainers are more attracted by gnome. To be fair to KVim developers please read threads "Why lua? or questions about

Re: Kvim broken in alioth

2005-05-30 Thread Rigo Wenning
Am Monday 30 May 2005 12:22 verlautbarte Matej Cepl : > and Bram was > unsupportive to the whole idea of KVim. That's what I meant. KVim had to re-engineer too many things because of the lack of support from upstream. So I will have to wait for kate to get more regex-support. What is a bit sad i

Re: KDE on Sarge

2005-05-30 Thread Martin Atukunda
On Saturday 28 May 2005 04:04, justme wrote: > I installed KDE on sarge debian > > It does not start automaticaly > > when I do: startX it says: > > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Xinit/Xserverrc: line 2: /usr/bin/X11/X: Onknown > > directory or file > > Xinit: no such file or directory (errno2): unable to

Re: Kvim broken in alioth

2005-05-30 Thread cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
On Monday 30 May 2005 14:26, Rigo Wenning wrote: > Am Monday 30 May 2005 12:22 verlautbarte Matej Cepl : > What is a bit sad is that efforts are now split between yzis and kate > instead of championing one editor. But this is how the world works today. yes and no: - yes there both editors, so in

Re: Kvim broken in alioth

2005-05-30 Thread Isaac Clerencia
On Monday, 30 de May de 2005 16:04, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Monday 30 May 2005 14:26, Rigo Wenning wrote: > > Am Monday 30 May 2005 12:22 verlautbarte Matej Cepl : > > > > What is a bit sad is that efforts are now split between yzis and kate > > instead of championing one editor. But

Re: Kvim broken in alioth

2005-05-30 Thread cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
On Monday 30 May 2005 16:13, Isaac Clerencia wrote: > Just now Kate and Kyzis developers are talking about how to share as most > code as possible, in fact, the next step is being to be able to use the > Yzis component inside Kate :) interesting, how exactly will that work? I'm not sure how to pic

Re: Kvim broken in alioth

2005-05-30 Thread cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
On Monday 30 May 2005 16:42, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Monday 30 May 2005 16:13, Isaac Clerencia wrote: > > Just now Kate and Kyzis developers are talking about how to share as > > most code as possible, in fact, the next step is being to be able to > > use the Yzis component inside Ka

Re: Kvim broken in alioth

2005-05-30 Thread Isaac Clerencia
On Monday, 30 de May de 2005 16:42, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Monday 30 May 2005 16:13, Isaac Clerencia wrote: > > Just now Kate and Kyzis developers are talking about how to share as most > > code as possible, in fact, the next step is being to be able to use the > > Yzis component in

amaroK crashes on startup

2005-05-30 Thread Nick Vanderweit
Hello, everyone. Upon starting amaroK 1.2.3-1 on Debian PPC/sid, the program segfaults after a few seconds. When I try to get a backtrace, there are no debug symbols in the binaries. Unfortunately, I cannot compile from Debian source package in order to get debug symbols because "de

Re: amaroK crashes on startup

2005-05-30 Thread Björn Krombholz
On 5/30/05, Nick Vanderweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Nick, > Upon starting amaroK 1.2.3-1 on Debian PPC/sid, the program segfaults > after a few seconds. When I try to get a backtrace, there are no debug > symbols in the binaries. Unfortunately, I cannot compile from Debian > source