I use a free pop email service and am finding that this address is
continually bombarded by swen virus spam because the debian servers do not
munge addresses.
Is this going to be implemented anytime soon? My pop server only has a 6mb
limit and since I leave messages on the server for pseudo-IMA
A Dilluns 06 Octubre 2003 10:15, Antiphon va escriure:
> I use a free pop email service and am finding that this address is
> continually bombarded by swen virus spam because the debian servers do not
> munge addresses.
Try this,
http://www.hashref.com/prj/swendeleter/
maybe it can help you.
Re
Hi all,
I've following problem: I'm using kppp to connect to internet. It works
perfectly when logged as root. But when I'm logged in as normal user, pppd
dies with exit status 16 (modem hanged up) when checking username and
password. I suppose, there's some problem with access permissions, but I'
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 07:46:22PM -0700, Hereon wrote:
>
> So, it seems you are saying that there are some extra steps (besides what
> Paul indicated) that are _required_ to be done to get KDE installed on Sid,
> in consideration of these problems in kdebase & kdemultimedia. If that is
> true, w
Hello,
I cleaned up my kde menu a few days ago but I was too good ;-) now several
entries like Office (OO+Koffice) dissappeared totaly.
How do I obtain these entries again? Adding own subfolders and inserting
packages with the appropriate command? or is there a more "sophisticated"
way?
I thi
On Monday 06 October 2003 13:37, Martin Wegmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I cleaned up my kde menu a few days ago but I was too good ;-) now several
> entries like Office (OO+Koffice) dissappeared totaly.
> How do I obtain these entries again? Adding own subfolders and inserting
> packages with the appro
Hi,
I have an up to date woody with kde 3.1.0 (is there a newer one for
woody, where would I get it?).
With the last security update I continue to have truetype fonts
available for kde applications, but no longer for non kde applications
(like mozilla). Indeed, xlsfonts doesn't show any truetype
Thanks for that but I haven't had problems deleting the messages since KMail
has some POP3 filters that provide for this. The thing is, I do not have
access to a machine that can run 24/7 and delete them for me, either through
something like this or spamassasin or through mail client filtering.
On Monday 06 October 2003 09:19, Antiphon wrote:
> It is bad practice that the Debian listservs do not munge addresses. I
> realise that munging may not be implemented because people like to be able
> to respond to old threads privately but simply providing a mechanism as
> simple as spelling out
> I disagree with this idea and I don't want the addresses munged. It is
> very useful being able to reply to someone and I will just hit reply to
> reply to someone.
Well, that doesn't neccesarily mean that the email-addresses must not be
munged. I don't know if this is supported by any mailin
Munging does not mean only removing the domain. It can be simply a matter of
making [EMAIL PROTECTED] into joe at user dot or dot jp. That's not too hard
for
someone to figure out.
On Monday 06 October 2003 13:16, kosh wrote:
> On Monday 06 October 2003 09:19, Antiphon wrote:
> > It is bad prac
I have the same problem, and doesn't seem to be getting any better. Are there
really that many infected computers out there???
I'm having to leave my computer on all day to run swendleter every three
hours, otherwise my mailbox also overfills!
Chris
On Monday 06 October 2003 11:48, Leopold Pa
On Monday 06 October 2003 11:47, Antiphon wrote:
> Munging does not mean only removing the domain. It can be simply a matter
> of making [EMAIL PROTECTED] into joe at user dot or dot jp. That's not too
> hard for someone to figure out.
If I have to figure it out then I won't reply. I get thousands
Your example undermines your argument since no script could be written to get
around all of the possible variations on the simple way I outlined.
Good munging uses HTML entities to encode the relevant addresses so that each
person's address is never actually displayed inside the HTML which is w
On Monday 06 October 2003 12:26, Antiphon wrote:
> Your example undermines your argument since no script could be written to
> get around all of the possible variations on the simple way I outlined.
>
> Good munging uses HTML entities to encode the relevant addresses so that
> each person's address
It looks like you're misunderstanding me. I am only talking about when posting
the archives on the Web, not via e-mail. With email, you'd be able to hit
your reply just the same.
While it is possible to get around encoding, since few sites do it, it is not
worth it for spammers to try to get ar
Here's a URL for those interested in other techniques to encode addresses:
http://www.robertgraham.com/tools/mailtoencoder.html
On Monday 06 October 2003 14:26, Antiphon wrote:
> Your example undermines your argument since no script could be written to
> get around all of the possible variations o
On Monday 06 October 2003 12:59, Antiphon wrote:
> It looks like you're misunderstanding me. I am only talking about when
> posting the archives on the Web, not via e-mail. With email, you'd be able
> to hit your reply just the same.
>
> While it is possible to get around encoding, since few sites
The same problem here :(
Iknatius
Christof Hurschler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have the same problem, and doesn't seem to be getting any better. Are there
really that many infected computers out there???
I'm having to leave my computer on all day to run swendleter every three
hours,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:16:57AM -0600, kosh wrote:
> On Monday 06 October 2003 09:19, Antiphon wrote:
>
> > It is bad practice that the Debian listservs do not munge addresses. I
> > realise that munging may not be implemented because people like to be able
> > to respond to old threads private
> I've following problem: I'm using kppp to connect to internet. It works
> perfectly when logged as root. But when I'm logged in as normal user, pppd
> dies with exit status 16 (modem hanged up) when checking username and
> password. I suppose, there's some problem with access permissions, but I'v
On Monday 06 October 2003 13:03, Zbynek Vrastil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've following problem: I'm using kppp to connect to internet. It works
> perfectly when logged as root. But when I'm logged in as normal user, pppd
> dies with exit status 16 (modem hanged up) when checking username and
> passwo
Wow, I didn't know that this list is also a newsgroup. Are saying then
that nothing should be done? That seems rather defeatist. Google Groups
makes some efforts with partial hex encoding (move your mouse over the
mailto links) and I believe they also take steps to limit large numbers of
reques
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:07:31PM -0400, Antiphon wrote:
> Wow, I didn't know that this list is also a newsgroup. Are saying then
> that nothing should be done? That seems rather defeatist. Google Groups
> makes some efforts with partial hex encoding (move your mouse over the
> mailto links) an
On Mon 06 Oct 2003 2:15 am, Antiphon wrote:
> I use a free pop email service and am finding that this address is
> continually bombarded by swen virus spam because the debian servers do not
> munge addresses.
>
> Is this going to be implemented anytime soon? My pop server only has a 6mb
> limit and
Andreas Goesele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have an up to date woody with kde 3.1.0 (is there a newer one for
> woody, where would I get it?).
Reading around, I found it:
deb http://download.kde.org/stable/3.1.4/Debian stable main
> With the last security update I continue to have truetype
Again, as mentioned by many people, if you don't want Spam, use and ISP
service that provides Spam blocking.. If you can't use an ISP with that
service, buy a POP address from any of the ISP's that sell just POP mailboxes
with full Anti-Spam features.. (Usually about $5/month) This is an issue
Well, I'm kind of bummed out about the whole thing now. Chris's point is
correct that there are other places where debian-kde is archived and that
getting everyone to change en masse would be difficult to do.
I don't have any faith in anti-spam legislation. There's no way laws can stop
spam. It
Any way to get a spam filter into kmail like Thunderbird has? I have
tried Spam Assassin, but it takes forever to download mail. Thunderbird
does this much quicker.
Is there something else out there that I can use other than Spam
Assassin in kmail?
Thanks!
Am Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2003 03:30 schrieb Antiphon:
> I don't have any faith in anti-spam legislation. There's no way laws can
> stop spam. It's like pornography, religions, drugs and guns. The more you
> try to regulate it, the less you'll succeed at stopping it. Spam is a
> problem created by te
You prove my point :-D Enough people will always want drugs, pr0n, guns,
religion, and spam products that you'll never be able to stop them from
getting (or attempting to get) it, including money from former Nigerian vice
presidents.
None of which is to say that these five things are similar i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 07. Oktober 2003 03:34 schrieb Jose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> zum Thema
Kmail+SPAM:
> Any way to get a spam filter into kmail like Thunderbird has? I have
> tried Spam Assassin, but it takes forever to download mail. Thunderbird
> does this muc
On October 6, 2003 21:34, Jose wrote:
> Any way to get a spam filter into kmail like Thunderbird has? I have
> tried Spam Assassin, but it takes forever to download mail.
> Thunderbird does this much quicker.
>
> Is there something else out there that I can use other than Spam
> Assassin in kmail?
33 matches
Mail list logo
