Re: links not launching Konqueror

2001-08-03 Thread Philipp Schmid
On Friday, 3. August 2001 02:03, Michael Dickey wrote: i have the same problem but i'm running debian unstable with kde2.2beta1 > reason for this to be happening. Any suggestions? sorry no... greets philipp

Compile small KDE application

2001-08-03 Thread Emil Wilmanski
Hello I'm using Debian with KDE v.2.1.1 and i try compile some programs. In fiew ones I have problem to do it: checking for KDE... libraries /usr/local/kde/lib, headers /usr/local/kde/include checking for extra includes... no checking for extra libs... no checking for KDE headers installed... c

Re: Compile small KDE application

2001-08-03 Thread David Bishop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 you need not only the libs, but the dev stuff. Easiest thing to do is just apt-get install task-kde-devel. That will give you all you need. On Friday 03 August 2001 08:37 am, Emil Wilmanski wrote: > Hello > > I'm using Debian with KDE v.2.1.1 and

Re: Compile small KDE application

2001-08-03 Thread Kolja Brix
Hello! Am Freitag, 3. August 2001 18:54 schrieb David Bishop: > you need not only the libs, but the dev stuff. Easiest thing to do is just > apt-get install task-kde-devel. That will give you all you need. I tried this on my Debian potato using deselect. Result: task-kde-devel not installed

Re: Compile small KDE application

2001-08-03 Thread David Bishop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 03 August 2001 09:34 am, Kolja Brix wrote: > Hello! > > Am Freitag, 3. August 2001 18:54 schrieb David Bishop: > > you need not only the libs, but the dev stuff. Easiest thing to do is > > just apt-get install task-kde-devel. That will giv

Re: Compile small KDE application

2001-08-03 Thread Kolja Brix
Hello David! Am Freitag, 3. August 2001 20:00 schrieb David Bishop: > > I tried this on my Debian potato using deselect. Result: > > task-kde-devel not installed ; install (was: install). Optional > > task-kde-devel recommends kdesdk > > kdesdk does not appear to be available > Probably depen

Re: Shared libs, moduledir

2001-08-03 Thread Andy Saxena
On Thursday August 02 2001 11:24, Michael Schuerig wrote: > I'm somewhat confused by all the places where shared libs (can) go. The > KDE debs put some (all? or only "modules"?) shared libs in > /usr/lib/kde2. KDE tarballs and projects created with KDevelop to put > them in /usr/local/lib/kde2. > >

Re: Shared libs, moduledir

2001-08-03 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
I can easily sum most if not all of this up. According to FHS and all a distribution is not supposed to touch anything in /usr/local. /usr/local is meant for use by enduser's. The reason why the KDE tarballs and projects created by KDevelop put things in /usr/local/xxx is because these are thin

Re: Shared libs, moduledir

2001-08-03 Thread Michael Schuerig
On Friday 03 August 2001 20:46, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: [shared lib locations, ld.so, ldconfig, KDE modules] > I can easily sum most if not all of this up. Ivan, thanks for replying. > According to FHS and all a distribution is not supposed to touch > anything in /usr/local. /usr/local is meant

Re: Shared libs, moduledir

2001-08-03 Thread exa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 04 August 2001 12:05 am, Michael Schuerig wrote: > > ...while KDE does indeed find modules installed in /usr/lib/kde2, it > apparently doesn't find modules in /usr/local/lib/kde2, even though my > KDEDIRS is set to /usr/local:/usr/. Appare

KDEDIRS (was: Shared libs, moduledir)

2001-08-03 Thread Michael Schuerig
On Saturday 04 August 2001 00:53, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > On Saturday 04 August 2001 12:05 am, Michael Schuerig wrote: > > ...while KDE does indeed find modules installed in /usr/lib/kde2, > > it apparently doesn't find modules in /usr/local/lib/kde2, even > > though my KDEDIRS is set to /usr/l

Re: Shared libs, moduledir

2001-08-03 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:05:35PM +0200, Michael Schuerig wrote: > On Friday 03 August 2001 20:46, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > [shared lib locations, ld.so, ldconfig, KDE modules] > > I can easily sum most if not all of this up. > > Ivan, thanks for replying. > > > According to FHS and all a di