> Since Ivan has already said he is not intending to back port KDE 2.2 to
> potato, it would be nice if we maintained versions of KOffice that use
> 2.1.2 libs (at least for those of us who haven't moved beyond potato yet).
Cool. Btw, this won't affect the KOffice upload schedule because the pot
When I launch konqueror with kdesu, the progress dialogs don't appear.
--
Sylvain Joyeux (5895)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:26:06AM +0800, Debian User wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2001 08:43, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > the quick and dirty:
> >
> > cd kdelibs (for example)
> > debuild
> >
> >
> > that's what I do to build all the packages... debuild is part
> > of the devscripts package. I *be
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:25:53PM -0400, Christopher Molnar wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> Would you consider applying the following patch to kdebase/debian/rules?
> It makes things compile much better here.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
> ==
>
> 22:23:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:01:38AM -0700, David Bishop wrote:
>
> Yep, my pluginviewer works great now (using Jen's recompiled qt package).
> Now I'm curious, what debian/kde apps *use* qt-gl? Is it more common than I
> know? 'Cuz I'm not thinking of anything off the top of my head. Dagg
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 11:15, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> To be truthfull I don't think the problem is the GL support of QT...it's
> the linkage to libpthreads by libGL. If you notice in the backtrace:
>
> #3 0x40e43dd4 in pthread_sighandler () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
It may be related to t
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Jens Hoffmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 June 2001 11:15, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > To be truthfull I don't think the problem is the GL support of QT...it's
> > the linkage to libpthreads by libGL. If you notice in the backtrace:
> >
> > #3 0x40e43dd4 i
Ok...so with kde 2.2 mostly uploaded (some bits already installed) to sid I
turned focus to QT again especially since I've personally had many crashes
of konsole due to the whole GL bit.
so this lead me to a immediate solution. I still do not like this solution
however this is one that I am comfo
Ivan --
Thanks a lot for fixing the libqt3 bugs I posted. I've installed the new
packages and they work -- well, almost .. :)
I have a couple of issues:
* qmake does not seem to be included in qt3-tools. Perhaps a separate
package would be justified?
* The new Designer allows you to build
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:27:35PM -0400, Data wrote:
>
> Ivan --
>
> Thanks a lot for fixing the libqt3 bugs I posted. I've installed the new
> packages and they work -- well, almost .. :)
>
> I have a couple of issues:
>
> * qmake does not seem to be included in qt3-tools. Perhaps a separa
This has been mentioned a few times, but I haven't seen any solution, or plan,
or recognition that it is a bug.
I've upgraded from 2.1.1 with working AA Fonts to the recent 2.2 alpha release,
and Anti-Aliased fonts have stopped working. Yes, if I, from a Konsole, set
QT_XFT to 1 and then run apps,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:42:06AM +0800, Trevor Phillips wrote:
> This has been mentioned a few times, but I haven't seen any solution, or plan,
> or recognition that it is a bug.
>
> I've upgraded from 2.1.1 with working AA Fonts to the recent 2.2 alpha
> release,
> and Anti-Aliased fonts have
Sounds great. Though I'm sure you've thought of it, maybe have one of those
"notes" that dpkg uses when a user install libqt-gl, saying VERY LOUDLY that
they'll have to change the linking option for any qt-gl apps, and emails it
to them if they have their priority level too high. Other than t
well..doing a debconf warning won't do any good for the maintainers of
the packages. It'll only annoy any users who install the library. I'm
expecting that people will file bug reports rather quickly that apps fail and
the maintainers will come yell at me and all will eventually be good.
new ma
14 matches
Mail list logo