On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 04:27:51PM +0200, Stephan Jaensch wrote:
> did something change regarding fonts with the last update in unstable? The
> standard arial font now appears almost as if it was bold, which is quite
> annoying... and the same amount of text now takes up much more space on the
On Thursday 17 May 2001 17:26, Ben Burton wrote:
> > > > kpackage. But kpackage fails to start from icon or cmd line.
> > > > Everything
> >
> > I've had this on my system too. It was gone after apt-get install rpm...
>
> Hi Mike.. someone else has had the same problem that was solved by
> installi
I'm not yet an everyday user of KDE, but I've been following the
progress on Debian unstable and I'm getting very close to making KDE my
everyday environment. I also follow this list closely. I have the
latest stuff from unstable as of yesterday.
So, does anybody else see toolbars that include t
I am trying to compile a non-debian kde package called kblade. The configure
script to build the package depends on kde headers containing a file called
"ksock.h". I can't seem to find this anywhere. What package (if any)
includes this header file ?
P.S.
I am using Debian/unstable and have
James D. Freels wrote:
I am trying to compile a non-debian kde package called kblade. The configure
script to build the package depends on kde headers containing a file called
"ksock.h". I can't seem to find this anywhere. What package (if any)
includes this header file ?
P.S.
I am using Deb
Hi -- I just "upgraded" to the latest Konqueror from 2.1.1-6 to
2.1.1.0-0.potato3. Is this an upgrade? The version numbers are
confusing.
(In /etc/apt/sources.list, I have:
deb http://kde.tdyc.com/ potato main crypto optional
Here are excerpts from running "apt-get install konqueror":
# apt
> I tested this on one of my Debian systems and removing rpm caused the crash
> of kpackage.After reinstalling rpm , kpackage started up fine. So it
> appears that with Debian, rpm is a Depends.
Thanks for that. I've filed a bug report asking for rpm to be listed as a
dependency which should so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
Has KDE made it into testing yet?
Thanks.
Stephen.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7BYh9Pmm0AnNwb5MRAtnMAJ9IFEs67sfrg7Y84/hqQBMF/l30bACeKSFi
Jf6DOXmH2Bd5SX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, 18. May 2001 22:39, Stephen J. Thompson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello all,
>
> Has KDE made it into testing yet?
yes.
HS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info
9 matches
Mail list logo