them.
There is a bug report open, requesting that it is at least possible to disable
this behaviour from the settings dialog. If you don't like the access
key "feature" either, I humbly suggest that you go and vote for this bug
report.
Use this link to see the bug report:
http
my network snafu I ended up being a day behind in uploads for
> woody..
> which actually ends up being a good thing. :) (at least IMO)...in the 24hrs
> to follow beta1 a bunch of bug fixes have been made including one very
> annoying
> one with email configuration. (plus 24hrs more
option 3: wait for 2.1's release to do potato debs
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:03:11PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
>option 3: wait for 2.1's release to do potato debs
this option!
:-)
best regards
--
~~~ /* |
QLIVER / | / | ~
~~/| / | ~Marcin Landowski
In case the polls are still open
I vote for 2.
KDE is the best work environment I can have. I feel that option 2 will leave
me with a working system more likely than 3.
--
Did you know that if you play a Windows 2000 cd backwards, you
will hear the voice of Satan?
That's nothing
option 1: upgrade potato .deb's to 2.1-beta1+ (ie..move from stable
to cvs snapshots as I am doing with woody)
Ivan,
I agree that Option 3 seems most fitting (in accord with the stable
status of potato). Option 2 would certainly be acceptable though it
would be more demanding of your time -- a quantity with which you are
already all too generous.
By the way -- add my name to the list of folks who greatly
Ivan,
I think we have been test dummies for kde as it is now - so I guess I would
vote for option 1 as long as it doesn't complete wipe out kmail - :)
Thank you
On Thursday 14 December 2000 22:03, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> ok... Potato users be heard (woody users are stuck with wha
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: vote
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 10:05:52 +0100
From: Pablo de Vicente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Myles Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
El Vie 15 Dic 2000 07:39, Myles Green escribió:
>On Thursday 14 December 2000 23:03, Ivan E. Moore
t;>
>>
>>
>>> so..your choice.
>>
>> I would prefer option 3: wait for 2.1's release to do potato debs, but
>> would settle for otion 2.
>
>
> I like this proposal. I vote for it.
>
> Pablo
Agree.
Sönke
--
Ping Netzwerksysteme
I vote for option 3 because the other two would not be stable. Potato
implies stable (I think *is* very stable). Would be have 2.0.1
maintainence?
>Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 23:03:11 -0700
>Resent-from: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
>From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL PROT
My choice:
> option 3: wait for 2.1's release to do potato debs
Thanks & greetings,
Hanno
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:03:11PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> ok... Potato users be heard (woody users are stuck with what I give you) :)
>
>option 1: upgrade potato .deb's to 2.1-beta1+ (ie..move from stable to
> cvs snapshots as I am doing with woody)
>
>option 2:
On Friday 15 December 2000 00:39, Myles Green wrote:
> On Thursday 14 December 2000 23:03, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > ok... Potato users be heard (woody users are stuck with what I give
> > you) :)
>
>
>
> > so..your choice.
>
> I would prefer option 3: wait for 2.1's release to do potato debs,
7;s release to do potato debs, but
>would settle for otion 2.
I like this proposal. I vote for it.
Pablo
--
_
Pablo de Vicente ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.oan.es (Spain
I vote for option 2, out of conservative fear.
Quim
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jan Warnking wrote:
>
> If I have a coice, I prefer stable packages over new features (within
> reasonable limits - I guess you could argue that I really should be
> running KDE1 then...). After all, th
be
> running KDE1 then...). After all, that's why I'm running Potato, not
> Woody.
> I'd vote for option 2, if (or once) Ivan got the impression that the 2.0.x
> packages have settled down completely, and there is nothing more to fix
> there from a packaging point of vie
>option 3: wait for 2.1's release to do potato debs
If I have a coice, I prefer stable packages over new features (within
reasonable limits - I guess you could argue that I really should be
running KDE1 then...). After all, that's why I'm running Potato, not
Woody.
I'
> > > I would prefer option 3: wait for 2.1's release to do potato debs, but
> > > would settle for otion 2.
> >
> > I vote for this too.
> Anyway I think 2.1 is not going to include things 2.0.1 (like kde pim for
> example) so I think it would be a
;
> >
> > > so..your choice.
> >
> > I would prefer option 3: wait for 2.1's release to do potato debs, but
> > would settle for otion 2.
>
> I vote for this too.
Anyway I think 2.1 is not going to include things 2.0.1 (like kde pim for
example) so I t
2.1's release to do potato debs, but
> would settle for otion 2.
I vote for this too.
--
__
Daniel de los Reyes
S2-Selling Soluciones
Valencia Spain
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by Debian GNU-Linux 2.2r2
__
On Thursday 14 December 2000 23:03, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> ok... Potato users be heard (woody users are stuck with what I give
> you) :)
> so..your choice.
I would prefer option 3: wait for 2.1's release to do potato debs, but
would settle for otion 2.
--
Myles Green Calgary AB Canada
http
ok... Potato users be heard (woody users are stuck with what I give you) :)
option 1: upgrade potato .deb's to 2.1-beta1+ (ie..move from stable to
cvs snapshots as I am doing with woody)
option 2: create a seperate repository on kde.tdyc.com for kde 2.1 potato
23 matches
Mail list logo
