Re: testing KDE3 (was: anti-aliasing is *NOT* supported!)

2002-01-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:50:48AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > "When it's ready". Bear in mind, however, that KDE has the fastest > release team/whatever known to man. Any chance of getting them to work on Debian instead/as well :-) . -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydrea

Re: testing KDE3 (was: anti-aliasing is *NOT* supported!)

2002-01-08 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:11:28PM +0100, Jeppe Buk wrote: > On Tuesday 08 January 2002 21:50, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:44:13PM +0200, Jarno Elonen wrote: > > > > > > + How smoothly does the CVS version of KDE 3 beta coexist on the > > > same computer with current 2.2 deb

Re: testing KDE3 (was: anti-aliasing is *NOT* supported!)

2002-01-08 Thread Jarno Elonen
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 23:06, Chris Cheney wrote: > > > :) If you say so.. > > > > Well, by all means fix it in Qt 2.2 and KDE2.2 upstream if you want. :) > > Sound like a plan to me. ;) Don't push me.. I just might! :P (if I knew what there is to fix, that is..) - Jarno

Re: testing KDE3 (was: anti-aliasing is *NOT* supported!)

2002-01-08 Thread Jeppe Buk
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 21:50, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:44:13PM +0200, Jarno Elonen wrote: > > > > + How smoothly does the CVS version of KDE 3 beta coexist on the > > same computer with current 2.2 debian packages? I would very much > > like to test it already but haven

Re: testing KDE3 (was: anti-aliasing is *NOT* supported!)

2002-01-08 Thread Chris Cheney
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:50:48AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:44:13PM +0200, Jarno Elonen wrote: > > > It will be quite important as an interface option in KDE3, but I think > > > > Great! Now that we are on it, btw, do you know: > > > > + How smoothly does the CVS v

Re: testing KDE3 (was: anti-aliasing is *NOT* supported!)

2002-01-08 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:44:13PM +0200, Jarno Elonen wrote: > > It will be quite important as an interface option in KDE3, but I think > > Great! Now that we are on it, btw, do you know: > > + How smoothly does the CVS version of KDE 3 beta coexist on the same >computer with current 2.2 de

testing KDE3 (was: anti-aliasing is *NOT* supported!)

2002-01-08 Thread Jarno Elonen
> > I don't think AA on KDE is particularily buggy and should, instead, be > > considered quite an important feature if we want to eventually build a > > desktop UI that can seriously compete with the commercial one(s). Look & > > feel and usability are one of the areas we are most likely to fail i