On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 7:01:42 PM CEST you wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 6:10:56 PM CEST you wrote:
> > Looking at: [1](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Rng-tools), and then
> > following to: [2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> > Hardware_random_number_generator), one can think t
On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 6:10:56 PM CEST you wrote:
> Looking at: [1](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Rng-tools), and then
> following to: [2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Hardware_random_number_generator), one can think that rng-tools uses: [3]
> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RdRand)
Looking at: [1](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Rng-tools), and then
following to: [2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Hardware_random_number_generator), one can think that rng-tools uses: [3]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RdRand).
But it might not be so, since [2] says: "The RdRand opcode w
On Friday, July 27, 2018 7:19:05 PM CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> El miércoles, 25 de julio de 2018 11:48:55 -03 Andy G Wood escribió:
> > On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 15:01:37 BST inkbottle wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > Also, introducing Haveged could lead to sensitive application
El miércoles, 25 de julio de 2018 11:48:55 -03 Andy G Wood escribió:
> On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 15:01:37 BST inkbottle wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Also, introducing Haveged could lead to sensitive application using
> > "questionable" entropy.
> >
> >
> > HAVEGE is a random number generator that explo
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 15:01:37 BST inkbottle wrote:
[...]
> Also, introducing Haveged could lead to sensitive application using
> "questionable" entropy.
>
>
> HAVEGE is a random number generator that exploits the modifications of the
> internal CPU hardware states (caches, branch predictors
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 9:14:40 AM CEST Sander van Grieken wrote:
> I did some digging, as I was a bit surprised QHash needs (secure) randomness
> at all.
>
> Turns out, reading http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qhash.html#qhash , that QHash has
> an inbuilt protection against hashtable bucket bias attack
On maandag 23 juli 2018 08:01:36 CEST Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hello inkbottle.
>
> inkbottle - 22.07.18, 23:42:
> > As some of you already know, since *completely uneventful* upgrade of
> > Friday, July 20, 2018, "sddm" does not start automatically anymore,
> > whether because something goes w
On Monday, July 23, 2018 8:01:36 AM CEST Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hello inkbottle.
>
> inkbottle - 22.07.18, 23:42:
> > As some of you already know, since *completely uneventful* upgrade of
> > Friday, July 20, 2018, "sddm" does not start automatically anymore,
> > whether because something goe
El lunes, 23 de julio de 2018 19:01:11 -03 Martin Steigerwald escribió:
[snip]
> > Some people even found this bug with kernel 4.16, it seems that
> > something in the kernel is changing.
>
> AFAIR kernel developers changed that the kernel is now more honest about
> when it has gathered enough ent
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer - 23.07.18, 15:21:
> El lunes, 23 de julio de 2018 03:01:36 -03 Martin Steigerwald
escribió:
> > Hello inkbottle.
> >
> > inkbottle - 22.07.18, 23:42:
> > > As some of you already know, since *completely uneventful* upgrade
> > > of
> > > Friday, July 20, 2018,
El lunes, 23 de julio de 2018 03:01:36 -03 Martin Steigerwald escribió:
> Hello inkbottle.
>
> inkbottle - 22.07.18, 23:42:
> > As some of you already know, since *completely uneventful* upgrade of
> > Friday, July 20, 2018, "sddm" does not start automatically anymore,
> > whether because somethin
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 01:33:46AM +0200, inkbottle wrote:
> No I was rather meaning, where, during the boot process, it is invoked.
It is a service so it is invoked by the init system.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello inkbottle.
inkbottle - 22.07.18, 23:42:
> As some of you already know, since *completely uneventful* upgrade of
> Friday, July 20, 2018, "sddm" does not start automatically anymore,
> whether because something goes wrong at some point or because it
> doesn't start at all, meaning it is not e
de mine, I discarded that eventuality. "Well, what do you know!"
What tty login process are you referring to, specifically? What command did
you type? Plain user or "su"?
I've tried "systemctl restart sddm" as "su", with mixed results (not sure if
it
On Sunday, July 22, 2018 11:50:51 PM CEST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 11:42:32PM +0200, inkbottle wrote:
> > As some of you already know, since *completely uneventful* upgrade of
> > Friday, July 20, 2018, "sddm" does not start automatically anymore,
> > whether because some
; offending kernel is currently 4.17.8-1.
Wow, I'm impressed. I've thought about that, but since I've seen no complain,
beside mine, I discarded that eventuality. "Well, what do you know!"
What tty login process are you referring to, specifically? What command did
you ty
On 7/22/18 5:42 PM, inkbottle wrote:
As some of you already know, since *completely uneventful* upgrade of Friday,
July 20, 2018, "sddm" does not start automatically anymore, whether because
something goes wrong at some point or because it doesn't start at all, meaning
it is not even invoked in t
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 11:42:32PM +0200, inkbottle wrote:
> As some of you already know, since *completely uneventful* upgrade of Friday,
> July 20, 2018, "sddm" does not start automatically anymore, whether because
> something goes wrong at some point or because it doesn't start at all,
> mean
As some of you already know, since *completely uneventful* upgrade of Friday,
July 20, 2018, "sddm" does not start automatically anymore, whether because
something goes wrong at some point or because it doesn't start at all, meaning
it is not even invoked in the first place, that I know not ;)
20 matches
Mail list logo
