On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> To put my example for an "ugly problem" in words:
> A program links with two libraries. One of them has an inter-library
> dependency on libpng2, the other one has an inter-library dependency on
> libpng3. AFAIR the -dev packages of the
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > What? That means that you can't have a libpng3 program on a machine with
> > > libqt2-dev installed ... icky.
> >
> > Yes, but that's the only way I see to ensure that there aren't some ugly
> > problems like e.g.
>
> No, completely wrong. You want to k
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > > > How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also link
> > > > with libpng3 ? Manual check ?
> > >
> > > Another possiblility is the following (only the new dependencies are
> > > listed):
>
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:12:45 +1100
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
>
> KDE packages for libpng2 will be uploaded today.
>
Can these KDE packages coexist with the self-rebuilt (from Ivan's last
uploads [sigh!]) qt, kdebase, etc, I already have. These have been
debuilt against png3. Or
Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> No it is not the case. Libpng-dev provides libpng2-dev (both are
> source-compatible). Libqt-dev should depend on libpng2-dev
> (<<1.2.0). That should work.
That sounds wrong.
libpng3 is not binary compatible with libpng2.
Silently bei
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also link
> > > with libpng3 ? Manual check ?
> >
> > Another possiblility is the following (only the new dependencies are
> > listed):
> >
> > Package: libqt2-dev
> > Conflicts: libpng3
> >
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:21:34AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:07:13AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > >
> > > > > It's only the -dev package, which is only
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:07:13AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> >
> > > > It's only the -dev package, which is only required
> > > > for the compile time, and I believe it is quite small, only
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:56:48AM +, John Gay wrote:
(sorry for the delay; this message was lost in the mists of time).
> So, if I understand you correctly, you are going to revert qt back to the
> old libpng2 rather than keep it at the new one, which Daniel is planning to
> re-compile the res
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:11:40AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On 7 Jan 2002, Philippe Troin wrote:
> > How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also link
> > with libpng3 ? Manual check ?
>
> Another possiblility is the following (only the new dependencies are
> listed):
>
>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:07:13AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > > It's only the -dev package, which is only required
> > > for the compile time, and I believe it is quite small, only
> > > with the symlinks and the static link files..
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:00:39 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 03:15:00AM +, Nick wrote:
>> Can Chris or anyone else who Understands please give a corresponding
>> comment about testing ?I believe the standard wisdom is that
>> testing KDE has been less useful than unstab
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > It's only the -dev package, which is only required
> > for the compile time, and I believe it is quite small, only
> > with the symlinks and the static link files...
> >
> > Or better, libqt2-dev depend on libpng2-dev.
>
> They generall
On 7 Jan 2002, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:06:27AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
> > -snip-
> > >
> > > Sounds good to fix all the current problems... however how are we
> > > going to handle the libpng2 -> libpng3 conversion ? Y
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:27:04AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > > How about libqt2-dev conflicting with libpng3-dev, or something like that.
> >
> > That's a bit obnoxious. Some folks might like to be developing code
> > that use
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > How about libqt2-dev conflicting with libpng3-dev, or something like that.
>
> That's a bit obnoxious. Some folks might like to be developing code
> that uses libqt2 and *other code* tha uses libpng3, on the same debian
> box.
It'
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:11:49PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > > How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also link
> > > with libpng3 ? Manual check ?
> >
> > yes manual check
>
>
> How about libqt2-dev confli
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also link
> > with libpng3 ? Manual check ?
>
> yes manual check
How about libqt2-dev conflicting with libpng3-dev, or something like that.
regards,
junichi
--
[
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 03:15:00AM +, Nick wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:42:55 -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
>
> >> On Monday 07 January 2002 07:22, Chris Cheney wrote:
> >
> >> > Hopefully unstable kde will be working good within 10 days (time for
> >> > buildds to catch up)
> >
> >After talkin
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:42:55 -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
>> On Monday 07 January 2002 07:22, Chris Cheney wrote:
>
>> > Hopefully unstable kde will be working good within 10 days (time for
>> > buildds to catch up)
>
>After talking to one of the buildd guys I think the estimate will probably
>be bum
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:04:27PM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:07:23AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
> > -snip-
> > >
> > > Sounds good to me.
> > >
> > > How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:07:23AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
> -snip-
> >
> > Sounds good to me.
> >
> > How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also link
> > with libpng3 ? Manual check ?
>
> yes manual check
Ok. Excellent.
W
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:07:23AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
-snip-
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also link
> with libpng3 ? Manual check ?
yes manual check
pgp3Az1eSA42r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:06:27AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
> -snip-
> >
> > Sounds good to fix all the current problems... however how are we
> > going to handle the libpng2 -> libpng3 conversion ? Your solution just
> > seems to postpone the proble
After talking to one of the buildd guys I think the estimate will probably
be bumped out to about 14 days, due to the time to build some of the key
packages.
Chris
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:07:48AM +, John Gay wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2002 07:22, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > Hopefully unstab
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:06:27AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
-snip-
>
> Sounds good to fix all the current problems... however how are we
> going to handle the libpng2 -> libpng3 conversion ? Your solution just
> seems to postpone the problem.
libqt 3.x already uses libpng3 so that looks like
On Monday 07 January 2002 07:22, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Hopefully unstable kde will be working good within 10 days (time for
> buildds to catch up).
Thanks for the estimate! I'll be sure to hold you to that : )
And thanks for the detailed explanation of where you and Daniel are going
from here! A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 January 2002 6:56 am, John Gay wrote:
...
> At the moment, I've only got problems with kmail missing icons. konq has
> its icon, unless I start it from the command line and I'm missing the KDE
> splash screen when I log in. I have not chec
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:56:48AM +, John Gay wrote:
> So, if I understand you correctly, you are going to revert qt back to the
> old libpng2 rather than keep it at the new one, which Daniel is planning to
> re-compile the rest of kde to?
Yes, I am sponsoring Daniel so I will be compiling kd
So, if I understand you correctly, you are going to revert qt back to the
old libpng2 rather than keep it at the new one, which Daniel is planning to
re-compile the rest of kde to?
This is just a temperary measure to fix the current majorly broken state of
KDE for the moment, right?
Are you and
I think that the best solution to the problem would be for me to upload a
new version of libqt2 2.3.1 compiled against libpng2. Due to the potential
problems with upgrading from stable (potato) to the future new stable
(woody). I will do this tomorrow morning. After I upload the new version of
lib
31 matches
Mail list logo
