Re: konqueror java support fails again - suggestion

2003-05-24 Thread Simon Hepburn
Mauro Darida wrote: > I have read somewhere about two fixes in java support. Maybe they can > explain my failure to make java working in konqueror: > 1. conflicts with the compiler: is kde 3.1.1 for woody compiled with > gcc2.95? Java must be compiled with the same gcc version...is my blackdown >

Re: konqueror java support fails again - suggestion

2003-05-24 Thread Mauro Darida
I have read somewhere about two fixes in java support. Maybe they can explain my failure to make java working in konqueror: 1. conflicts with the compiler: is kde 3.1.1 for woody compiled with gcc2.95? Java must be compiled with the same gcc version...is my blackdown j2re1.3 for woody compiled w

Re: konqueror java support fails again

2003-05-23 Thread Mauro Darida
On Saturday 17 May 2003 13:43, Simon Hepburn wrote: > Did you check the other java related symlinks in /etc/alternatives? I Checked: everything comes from j2re or j2se 1.3 debs. I enclose my update-alternatives --display java output... > working again, mc is a godsend for this sort of stuff. Als

Re: konqueror java support fails again

2003-05-17 Thread Hendrik Sattler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag, 17. Mai 2003 02:50 schrieb Patrick Dreker: > Am Samstag, 17. Mai 2003 02:13 schrieb Hendrik Sattler > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> zum Thema Re: konqueror java support fails again: > > On debian-java, someone posted a

Re: konqueror java support fails again

2003-05-17 Thread Simon Hepburn
Mauro Darida wrote: > Ehm, maybe you didn't read my msg entirely...I say, I CHANGED java machine > and installed the one from BLACKDOWN Apologies, I was up at 5am with my 2yr old yesterday and by the time I got to read my mail late last night my brain was a bit stale. > If it works, it should w

Re: konqueror java support fails again

2003-05-17 Thread Mauro Darida
On Saturday 17 May 2003 00:47, Simon Hepburn wrote: > Simon Hepburn wrote: > Sorry, upon rereading your original post I realised that you are using the > tarball from sun. The Debian alternatives system will only work if you use > the blackdown .debs. You can add one of these to /etc/apt/sources.l

Re: konqueror java support fails again

2003-05-16 Thread Patrick Dreker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag, 17. Mai 2003 02:13 schrieb Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> zum Thema Re: konqueror java support fails again: > On debian-java, someone posted a nice debian subdir to package the > blackdown tarball release of a mor cur

Re: konqueror java support fails again

2003-05-16 Thread Hendrik Sattler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag, 17. Mai 2003 00:47 schrieb Simon Hepburn: > Simon Hepburn wrote: > > With Debian you do not need to set an absolute path, "java" will suffice. > > /usr/bin/java is a symlink to /etc/alternatives/java which in turn points > > to the real loc

Re: konqueror java support fails again

2003-05-16 Thread Simon Hepburn
Simon Hepburn wrote: > With Debian you do not need to set an absolute path, "java" will suffice. > /usr/bin/java is a symlink to /etc/alternatives/java which in turn points > to the real location of your java vm. When you change/update your java vm > the debian install scripts should take care of

Re: konqueror java support fails again

2003-05-16 Thread Simon Hepburn
Mauro Darida wrote: > hello all, > thanks for your answers on my problem. I put in Konqueror: > path to java executable: /usr/local/j2re1.4.1/bin/java > and the previous error disappeared, but when trying a java application I > only got :' loading applet ' and nothing more. With Debian you do not

konqueror java support fails again

2003-05-16 Thread Mauro Darida
hello all, thanks for your answers on my problem. I put in Konqueror: path to java executable: /usr/local/j2re1.4.1/bin/java and the previous error disappeared, but when trying a java application I only got :' loading applet ' and nothing more. I tried a different java machine, installing debian