micro HOWTO: Upgrading to KDE2.2 beta1

2001-07-10 Thread exa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi people, Here is a rough description of what I did to upgrade to KDE2.2 beta1 I had previously played around with the alpha so I knew at once that there were major configuration incompatibilities. Surely rm -rf .kde isn't a good idea. I go

Re: KDE2.2 Beta1, terminal emulation

2001-06-30 Thread David Bishop
On Saturday 30 June 2001 18:30, Dan Berdine wrote: > On Saturday 30 June 2001 07:37 pm, David Bishop wrote: > > Haven't tried noatun yet, and with most everything else, I've been > > seeing speedups, but as for the x-terminal-emulator, try looking in > > /etc/alternatives for x-terminal-emulator an

Re: KDE2.2 Beta1, terminal emulation

2001-06-30 Thread David Bishop
Haven't tried noatun yet, and with most everything else, I've been seeing speedups, but as for the x-terminal-emulator, try looking in /etc/alternatives for x-terminal-emulator and seeing if 1) it is there and 2) that it's pointing to konsole. However, I just looked and on my box it's pointin

KDE2.2 Beta1, terminal emulation

2001-06-30 Thread Dan Berdine
Been using the beta a while, mostly really nice, but of course I have noticed a few minor bugs... I set Konsole to be used as the default terminal emulator, but every app I try to launch which should run in a terminal still complains that it can't find x-terminal-editor. Also some things tend

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-29 Thread Ben Burton
> Hm, I was too slow. Just tried to get kdelibs3 and kdebase from > http://incoming.debian.org, but they are not there anymore! They also are > not in ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kdelibs, so where are they now? Oops, ignore the last post. It seems Ivan has simply uploaded newer versions;

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-29 Thread Ben Burton
> Hm, I was too slow. Just tried to get kdelibs3 and kdebase from > http://incoming.debian.org, but they are not there anymore! They also are > not in ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kdelibs, so where are they now? They got picked up by the server yesterday afternoon and should show up after t

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-29 Thread Stephan Jaensch
On Friday, 29. June 2001 01:16, Ben Burton wrote: > > Well, I'm wondering how you did this. :-) I'm running Debian unstable too > > and when I update I get a whole slew of dependency problems because > > kdelibs3 is still 2.1.2-3 on my system (other packages like kmail are > > already 2.2-cvs). Sin

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-28 Thread David Bishop
On Thursday 28 June 2001 18:28, Jens Hoffmann wrote: > On Friday 29 June 2001 01:37, David Bishop wrote: > > Let me be so crass as to follow-up my own email, "initializing" .kde > > didn't fix anything. I was able to goto debian.org from the splash page > > link, tried to type in slashdot.org, and

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-28 Thread Jens Hoffmann
On Friday 29 June 2001 01:37, David Bishop wrote: > Let me be so crass as to follow-up my own email, "initializing" .kde didn't > fix anything. I was able to goto debian.org from the splash page link, > tried to type in slashdot.org, and immediately got the "http protocol > unexpectedly died" erro

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-28 Thread Ben Burton
> Well, I'm wondering how you did this. :-) I'm running Debian unstable too > and when I update I get a whole slew of dependency problems because > kdelibs3 is still 2.1.2-3 on my system (other packages like kmail are > already 2.2-cvs). Since it worked for you I am obviously doing something > wro

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-28 Thread David Bishop
Suprising nobody, that didn't help. Aargh. I can almost *taste* the desktop nirvana that is kde 2.2 *grin*. On Thursday 28 June 2001 03:44 pm, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > i doubt it..you can grab the new libqt packages out of incoming and find > out. > > Ivan > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:37:37

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-28 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
i doubt it..you can grab the new libqt packages out of incoming and find out. Ivan On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:37:37PM -0700, David Bishop wrote: > On Thursday 28 June 2001 04:23 pm, David Bishop wrote: > > > Yes, let me reiterate that everything else is going swimmingly (my > > respect-o-meter f

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-28 Thread Stephan Jaensch
On Friday, 29. June 2001 00:28, David Bishop wrote: > So, I'm now running beta-1 on my box, and enjoying the hell out of all the > nifty new options (and speedups, thanks!). Well, I'm wondering how you did this. :-) I'm running Debian unstable too and when I update I get a whole slew of dependen

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-28 Thread David Bishop
On Thursday 28 June 2001 04:23 pm, David Bishop wrote: > Yes, let me reiterate that everything else is going swimmingly (my > respect-o-meter for all kde hackers is shooting through the roof). > However, please note when you set up the proxy, make sure it's > authenticating, that seems to trigger

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-28 Thread David Bishop
On Thursday 28 June 2001 02:40 pm, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > So, I'm now running beta-1 on my box, and enjoying the hell out of all > > the nifty new options (and speedups, thanks!). All of the crash bugs I > > was having with alpha2 in the kcontrol panel are gone, they all work > > (pretty much

Re: kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-28 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
> So, I'm now running beta-1 on my box, and enjoying the hell out of all the > nifty new options (and speedups, thanks!). All of the crash bugs I was > having with alpha2 in the kcontrol panel are gone, they all work (pretty > much, I have a reproducible bug I'll be filing in a minute) flawless

kde2.2-beta1

2001-06-28 Thread David Bishop
So, I'm now running beta-1 on my box, and enjoying the hell out of all the nifty new options (and speedups, thanks!). All of the crash bugs I was having with alpha2 in the kcontrol panel are gone, they all work (pretty much, I have a reproducible bug I'll be filing in a minute) flawlessly. Ho