Reported to listmaster and Debian CT.
Enjoy
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Marco Valli wrote:
> > not ignoring getting called Nazi and white supremacist
>
> https://archive.org/details/dont_get_mewrongim_notanazi
>
> rotfl
>
> --
> Marco Valli
--
PREINING Norbert https://w
+1 Luigi
Op ma 24 jan. 2022 11:58 schreef Luigi Toscano :
> Marco Valli ha scritto:
>
> Marco, please stop.
>
> This is beyond the point of whether your starting point may have had some
> merit if expressed differently or not.
>
> --
> Luigi
>
>
Marco Valli ha scritto:
Marco, please stop.
This is beyond the point of whether your starting point may have had some
merit if expressed differently or not.
--
Luigi
> not ignoring getting called Nazi and white supremacist
https://archive.org/details/dont_get_mewrongim_notanazi
rotfl
--
Marco Valli
On Sun, 23 Jan 2022, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
> Debian like most human groups has rules on how to become and stay a member of
Like
* "not complaining when getting bullied and publicily thrown mud at" or
* "not daring to criticize the oligarchs" or
* "not expecting fair treatment when one is not bu
You:
> It is sad to see what is happening from within Debian to Debian, but I
> see myself not in a position to do much about it.
I second that.
Kindest regards,
Dietz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
per status from
someone who contributed a lot to KDE packages in Debian, it is fair
enough for users to express their frustration with that.
Muting discussion is a pattern I have seen so often in Debian that I
meanwhile unsubscribed from various development related mailing lists of
Debian. Al
Dear all,
please consider that events being commented here have already happened, had
consequences and it’s not like you can go back in time.
Debian like most human groups has rules on how to become and stay a member of
the community. If you’re interested in them you can find pointers at :
http
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:18:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I can NOT follow this removal suggestions.
>
> Both kmag and kmousetool work in my environment.
You may be misunderstanding what does autoremove do. It's simply removes
packages that are not marked as installed manually and are not
dep
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 2:01 PM Luigi Toscano wrote:
>
> Sedat Dilek ha scritto:
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:05 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >>
> >> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to this ML ]
> >
> libreoffice-kde5 is a metapackage that can be safely removed.
> >
> >> Removing libreoffice-
Sedat Dilek ha scritto:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:05 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>
>> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to this ML ]
>
libreoffice-kde5 is a metapackage that can be safely removed.
>
>> Removing libreoffice-kde5 now shows...
>>
>>libreoffice-kf5 (1:6.4.5~rc1-1)
>>libre
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:05 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to this ML ]
> >> libreoffice-kde5 is a metapackage that can be safely removed.
> Removing libreoffice-kde5 now shows...
>
>libreoffice-kf5 (1:6.4.5~rc1-1)
>libreoffice-qt5 (1:6.4.5~rc1-1)
>
> ...as
[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to this ML ]
In data sabato 20 giugno 2020 11:18:53 CEST, Sedat Dilek ha scritto:
> How can I see from where this removal suggestion is coming from?
Thanks for your feedback Marco.
>> Reinstall kdeaccessibility, the metapackage that keep installed kmag e
>> kmo
In data sabato 20 giugno 2020 11:18:53 CEST, Sedat Dilek ha scritto:
> How can I see from where this removal suggestion is coming from?
Reinstall kdeaccessibility, the metapackage that keep installed kmag e
kmousetools.
libreoffice-kde5 is a metapackage that can be safely removed.
regards
--
Hi,
I am here on Debian/testing AMD64.
IMPORTANT: This system was dist-upgraded from buster > stretch > bullseye.
I have disabled all old releases in APT and sources.lists.
Yesterday, I removed some relicts:
-ii apper 1.0.0-2+b2
-ii apper-data 1.0.0-2
-ii kdeaccessibility 4:17.08.3+5.104
-ii p
The access denied error was resolved with a reboot.
Now upgrade and dist-upgrade completed! Thank you Andrey!!
Marco
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:35 PM Marco Paolieri wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I kept adding the dependencies to the command line, and this worked:
>
> $ LANG=C sudo dpkg -r libkf5ldap5 li
Thanks!
I kept adding the dependencies to the command line, and this worked:
$ LANG=C sudo dpkg -r libkf5ldap5 libkf5libkdepim-plugins
libkf5libkdepim-plugins libkf5mailimporter5 libkf5libkdepim-plugins
kontact libkf5mailimporterakonadi5
Package libkf5libkdepim-plugins:amd64 listed more than o
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:05:02PM -0700, Marco Paolieri wrote:
> Is there a different way I should remove the libkf5ldap5 package?
Try dpkg -r. Though if something depends on it, and it probably does,
you'll need either ask dpkg to ignore deps, or remove all deps too.
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11
Is there a different way I should remove the libkf5ldap5 package?
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:03 PM Marco Paolieri wrote:
> Thank you very much for the suggestion... What I get is:
>
> $ LANG=C sudo apt-get remove libkf5ldap5
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading st
Thank you very much for the suggestion... What I get is:
$ LANG=C sudo apt-get remove libkf5ldap5
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
You might want to run 'apt --fix-broken install' to correct these.
The following packages have unmet dependenci
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:18:54PM -0700, Marco Paolieri wrote:
> dpkg: errore nell'elaborare l'archivio
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libkf5ldap-data_19.08.3-1_all.deb (--unpack):
> tentata sovrascrittura di "/usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/libkldap5.mo"
> presente anche nel pacchetto libkf5ldap5:am
I got caught in a broken install during a dist-upgrade in sid (I knew the
risks, no complaints).
Is it possible to remove (from the CTRL-ALT-F1 login terminal) all KDE
related packages and then reinstall KDE? (I suspect the problem is there.)
I include my output in case it's useful to describe the
Hi Rubin,
On Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2016 12:35:28 CEST Rubin Abdi wrote:
> I just realized that none of my KDE or KDE related packages on Debian Sid
> have gotten updated in a few months. Trying to determine if something I did
> in the past broke something with apt. Here's a list of what I've currently
I just realized that none of my KDE or KDE related packages on Debian Sid
have gotten updated in a few months. Trying to determine if something I did
in the past broke something with apt. Here's a list of what I've currently
got installed...
http://paste.debian.net/680790/
http://paste.debian.net/
Hi,
could anybody point me to a Debian repository with packages for Python KDE
for the current version of KDE (which is 3.4.1 here with packages from
alioth)?
Thanks a lot,
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
Th
Alex Nordstrom schrieb:
> /usr/bin/kwrite is part of the kate package.
That's true.
> kdegraphics was apparently removed "as part of the tiff/libexif
> transition" according to
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=268966 (it's always
> good to check the BTS before asking about a su
On Thursday, 2 Sep 2004 17:12, Hannes Kuhnert wrote:
> Since Tuesday some KDE packages aren't anymore contained in Sarge.
>
> Some Examples:
>
> kwrite
> kdegraphics
> kuickshow
> kpdf
> kviewshell
> ^ don't know the exact name
>
> Has anyone els
Since Tuesday some KDE packages aren't anymore contained in Sarge.
Some Examples:
kwrite
kdegraphics
kuickshow
kpdf
kviewshell
^ don't know the exact name
Has anyone else noticed it? I think that's a bug.
Hannes
On Wednesday July 17 2002 6:21 pm, Severin Greimel wrote:
> Hi everbody,
>
> first of all let me apologize for not presenting a real problem... :)
>
> But I've wondered if anybody could explain to me why the KDE2 lib
> package is named kdelibs3 and the KDE3 counterpart ist named
> kdelibs4? I'm sur
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:57:56PM +0100, Peter Nuttall wrote:
>
> 1. should you run apt-get dist-upgrade as well as apt-get upgrade?
In normal use, you should run just use apt-get upgrade. This will cause
apt to upgrade any packages which it can without installing new packages
or removing old on
On 10.Sep 2003 - 23:57:56, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 Sep 2003 11:09 pm, Paul Cupis wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 September 2003 22:59, Peter Nuttall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > When I have been runnig apt-get upgrade on my sid box I have noticed
> > > that som
On Wednesday 10 Sep 2003 11:09 pm, Paul Cupis wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 September 2003 22:59, Peter Nuttall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I have been runnig apt-get upgrade on my sid box I have noticed
> > that some of the packages are not being upgraded. Can some one tell
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 22:59, Peter Nuttall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I have been runnig apt-get upgrade on my sid box I have noticed
> that some of the packages are not being upgraded. Can some one tell
> me why?
They are pro
Hi,
When I have been runnig apt-get upgrade on my sid box I have noticed that some
of the packages are not being upgraded. Can some one tell me why?
pete
ps: list of the packages:
cervisia
kbabel
kdemultimedia
kompare
kspy
kvlc
libqt3-compat-headers
libqt3-headers
libqt3-mt-dev
libqt3-plu
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:41:46PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Looks like it is related to the QT 3.1 -> 3.2 upgrade. Some
> kde libs may require recompile against qt 3.2? Try downloading
> libqt3c102 from testing.
Oh, I did not notice, that Qt3.2 is in SID now. This might indeed be
the problem.
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Michael Thaler wrote:
> Hello,
> after updating KDE today, all toolbars show strange graphics
> errors.
Looks like it is related to the QT 3.1 -> 3.2 upgrade. Some
kde libs may require recompile against qt 3.2? Try downloading
libqt3c102 from testing.
Hello,
after updating KDE today, all toolbars show strange graphics
errors. Does anyone else have this error? (I purged KDE and
reinstalled it to make sure it was not something with my
configuration, I also removed .kde, but these errors do remain). I
attached a screenshot of kate where you can se
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 00:24, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hello!
If you are (co-)maintining a testing installation ;-), then you have gcc 2.95,
3.0, 3.2 and probably 3.3. Kde Debian Packages are compiled with gcc 2.95 and
the libraries compiled with this version are incompatible with gcc 3.2,
Looks like you need to install libqt3-mt-dev
Chris
Hello!
I'm (co-)maintaining a Debian i386 testing installation. We've most
recently upgraded the box at last Sunday (no changes to today), and
replaced the KDE2 packages with kde3 packages from
deb http://download.kde.org/stable/3.1.3/Debian stable main
Now, I was trying to compile a package na
Hello,
Recently I checked the popularity contest's result and found the
following:
There is not a single KDE package in the top 200 votes...
The first KDE packages were kdelibs-bin (221), Konqueror (243th), kdm
(248) and kicker (261)...
I know that KDE is relatively new (at least in D
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 10:26:13AM -0300, Rogerio Acquadro wrote:
> Walking around at apt-get.org I found this address for the lastest
> KDE packages for Woody
>
> deb http://download.us.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/latest/Debian/ woody main
>
> has anybody teste
Hi everybody!
Walking around at apt-get.org I found this address for the lastest KDE
packages for Woody
deb http://download.us.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/latest/Debian/ woody main
has anybody tested this address yet and upgraded from KDE 2.2 to KDE
3.1? It works?
I am really concerned at
Hi everybody!
Walking around at apt-get.org I found this address for the lastest KDE
packages for Woody
deb http://download.us.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/latest/Debian/ woody main
has anybody tested this address yet and upgraded from KDE 2.2 to KDE
3.1? It works?
I am really concerned at
deb http://download.us.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/latest/Debian/ woody main
--
::: .''`. ::: Rogerio Acquadro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
::: : :' : ::: ICQ UIN: 6543753
::: `. `'` ::: Administrador de rede - CCS - UNICAMP
::: `-::: http://gulf.tripod.com.br
!! FREE SOFTWARE MEANS
dpkg --purge --force-depends kdelibs4 kdelibs4-dev
apt-get -f install
Dne st 26. března 2003 18:20 L. A. Linden Levy napsal(a):
> I ran into the same problem, and all I had to do was un-install kde and
> then reinstall all the 3.1.1 packages (this will kill kdm and X so do
> it from one of your v
To: "julien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Problems with KDE Packages after 3.1.0 => 3.1.1
> I ran into the same problem, and all I had to do was un-install kde and
> then reinstall all the 3.1.1 packages (this will kill kdm
I ran into the same problem, and all I had to do was un-install kde and
then reinstall all the 3.1.1 packages (this will kill kdm and X so do
it from one of your virtual terminals). I think that a better tool to
use is dselect because you can see the versions when you pick the
packages and it also
Hi,
First of all, I apologize for my very poor english. I'm also a new user of
Debian...
I tried last week to "upgrade" from kde 3.1.0 to 3.1.1 on a woody (stable), by
"apt-getting" packages.
Now, I have many versions problems (some packages are 3.1.0, others 3.1.1),
because I got an error wh
Paul Scott wrote:
James D. Freels wrote:
Hello Debian-KDE users !
For the sid users here, I get the following message on a
(not all may be kde, but most are)
"apt-get -d -y dist-upgrade"
I get this too. A new version is clearly being uploaded and isn't
quite all there yet. See the just previous
James D. Freels wrote:
Hello Debian-KDE users !
For the sid users here, I get the following message on a
(not all may be kde, but most are)
"apt-get -d -y dist-upgrade"
The following packages will be REMOVED:
kdebase ksysguard
The following packages have been kept back
ark kamera kappfinder kate
Hello Debian-KDE users !
For the sid users here, I get the following message on a
(not all may be kde, but most are)
"apt-get -d -y dist-upgrade"
The following packages will be REMOVED:
kdebase ksysguard
The following packages have been kept back
ark kamera kappfinder kate kcalc kcharselect k
hello,
for me the policy of the official kde packages is a bit confusing. but anyway.
it would be nice to know the apps which will be available in sid in the future.
is there a list somewhere with apps planned to be in sid?
thnx wolfgang
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:17:24PM -0500, Jeff Tranter scrawled:
> I'm curious why the KDE 3.1 Debian packages have a build dependency on
> g++-3.2 when they build just fine with older versions of g++? Is it just
> to make sure no one runs them on a system with the older compiler? For
> those of
I'm curious why the KDE 3.1 Debian packages have a build dependency on
g++-3.2 when they build just fine with older versions of g++? Is it just
to make sure no one runs them on a system with the older compiler? For
those of us building packages on a system based on Debian Woody, the
dependency
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 16:50, Mark Purcell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 03:05, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > a) Sorry
> > ...for the inconvenience about the Packages.gz file on the ftp server. I
> > didn't know why I should create 8 subdirectories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 03:05, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> a) Sorry
> ...for the inconvenience about the Packages.gz file on the ftp server. I
> didn't know why I should create 8 subdirectories in a row just for a beta
> build and that I should have regenerate
Ralf Nolden wrote:
Hi,
three things :-)
a) Sorry
...for the inconvenience about the Packages.gz file on the ftp server. I
didn't know why I should create 8 subdirectories in a row just for a beta
build and that I should have regenerated the Packages.gz file. As said, the
KDE 3.1 beta2 was no
On Sunday 06 October 2002 19:05, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> three things :-)
>
> a) Sorry
> ...for the inconvenience about the Packages.gz file on the ftp server. I
> didn't know why I should create 8 subdirectories in a row just for a beta
> build and that I should have regenerated the Packa
Hi,
three things :-)
a) Sorry
...for the inconvenience about the Packages.gz file on the ftp server. I
didn't know why I should create 8 subdirectories in a row just for a beta
build and that I should have regenerated the Packages.gz file. As said, the
KDE 3.1 beta2 was not correct anyway
> The maintainer of the above packages has compiled his own 3.0.3 packages from
> CVS and built these new kde packages against 3.0.3.
More or less. I've just left the country for a week and a half and so I
did the upload the day before. This problem should only last until
kdelibs/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 16 August 2002 09:12, Doug Holland wrote:
> For some reason, dselect and apt-get are refusing to upgrade my KDE
> packages to 3.0.3. When I try to upgrade one of the packages, I get the
> following error.
>
> # apt-get u
Hi Doug,
> # apt-get upgrade kdelibs4
You want 'apt-get install kdelibs4'. See 'man apt-get', the sections on
'install' and 'upgrade'.
Regards,
Manuel
For some reason, dselect and apt-get are refusing to upgrade my KDE packages
to 3.0.3. When I try to upgrade one of the packages, I get the following
error.
# apt-get upgrade kdelibs4
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back
Hi everbody,
first of all let me apologize for not presenting a real problem... :)
But I've wondered if anybody could explain to me why the KDE2 lib package is
named kdelibs3 and the KDE3 counterpart ist named kdelibs4? I'm sure there is
some reasonable explanation for this, but unfortunately n
On Sun 21 Apr 2002 16:16, Magnus von Koeller wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 21 April 2002 16:59, John Gay wrote:
> > I.E. get a list of packages that depend on kdelibs3 and pass that
> > to apt-get or dpkg in some way?
>
> How do you like the attached script?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 21 April 2002 16:59, John Gay wrote:
> I.E. get a list of packages that depend on kdelibs3 and pass that
> to apt-get or dpkg in some way?
How do you like the attached script?
- --
- -M
- --- Magnus von Koeller ---
email:[EMAIL PROT
On Wed 17 Apr 2002 11:42, Hans Aschauer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a feasible way to show all KDE packages that I have
> > installed?
>
> [...]
>
> I use dpkg-awk for this task; the following command shows all debian
> packages which depend on kde
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
>> is there a feasible way to show all KDE packages that I have
>> installed?
>
> *grin*
>
> You could try removing kdelibs3 and see what gets taken along with it.
>
> Seriously, I would use the search criteri
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 11:48 am, Ben Burton wrote:
> > is there a feasible way to show all KDE packages that I have
> > installed?
>
> *grin*
>
> You could try removing kdelibs3 and see what gets taken along with it.
>
> Seriously, I would use the search crit
> is there a feasible way to show all KDE packages that I have
> installed?
*grin*
You could try removing kdelibs3 and see what gets taken along with it.
Seriously, I would use the search criteria "installed and depends on
kdelibs3" rather than grepping descriptions, though I
> Hi,
>
> is there a feasible way to show all KDE packages that I have
> installed?
[...]
I use dpkg-awk for this task; the following command shows all debian
packages which depend on kdelibs3, and which have a Status of "install
ok installed".
dpk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
is there a feasible way to show all KDE packages that I have
installed? apt-cache search KDE shows all packages, not only those
that I have installed. dpkg -l '*kde*' doesn't work because lots of
KDE packages (kmail, knode,
I believe a better audience for you question is the debian-kde list.
I have reformatet your message for better readability and sent it
there.
[Juha Jäykkä]
> What is wrong with the various woody kde packages (knode,
> kdebase3, keystone, kdebase3-bin...), since almost every
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:06:27PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> The autobuilders seem to fail for all KDE packages. The problem seem
> to be related to kdebase and kdelibs. Checking
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=koffice&ver=1%3A1.1.1-6&arch=arm&
The autobuilders seem to fail for all KDE packages. The problem seem
to be related to kdebase and kdelibs. Checking
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=koffice&ver=1%3A1.1.1-6&arch=arm&stamp=1014541962&file=log&as=raw>,
I see this:
The following informat
On Monday 21 January 2002 04:37, fl ² wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A couple of months ago, Ivan said prelinking would be available for KDE
> packages once upstream changes are made to binutils & glibc
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2001/debian-kde-200110/msg00269.html
&
Hello,
A couple of months ago, Ivan said prelinking would be available for KDE
packages once upstream changes are made to binutils & glibc
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2001/debian-kde-200110/msg00269.html
As I am not a glibc insider, I'd like to know how things are progressing a
Am Samstag, 19. Januar 2002 19:54 schrieb John Dalbec:
> I'm trying to upgrade my KDE packages to 2.2.2. I cannot find 2.2.2
> versions of kaiman, keystone, ksysctrl, libminimagick5, and pixie. Are
> these packages obsolete?
If you liked pixie you can get a (still work needing)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 January 2002 11:54 am, John Dalbec wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade my KDE packages to 2.2.2. I cannot find 2.2.2
> versions of kaiman, keystone, ksysctrl, libminimagick5, and pixie. Are
> these packages obsolete?
> Th
I'm trying to upgrade my KDE packages to 2.2.2. I cannot find 2.2.2
versions of kaiman, keystone, ksysctrl, libminimagick5, and pixie. Are
these packages obsolete?
Thanks,
John
> I'm running the kde packages for potato from kde.debian.net and found that
> the kivio line connector tool does not work at all. I searched the archives
> to see this mentioned back in April so why is this still broken?
The connector tool was broken in one of the KOffice bet
I'm running the kde packages for potato from kde.debian.net and found that
the kivio line connector tool does not work at all. I searched the archives
to see this mentioned back in April so why is this still broken?
Will it eventually be fixed so us potato users can enjoy this package?
A
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 02:12:57AM -0500, Alex Jacques wrote:
> What happened to the task-kde* packages?
>
> These were very useful, but now it seems that you have to order everything
> ala carte. This seems to have happened to other things too, like
> task-x-window-system.
>
> What happened to the task-kde* packages?
They are now called kde* instead.
Ben.
What happened to the task-kde* packages?
These were very useful, but now it seems that you have to order everything
ala carte. This seems to have happened to other things too, like
task-x-window-system.
What's up with this?
aded.
>
> When I install the kde-packages, the opposite is the case: my
> ~/.Xresources settings aren't loaded, but xrdb -query shows a lot of
> entries that i suspect to come from app-defaults.
There's an control center item 'Apply fonts and colors to non-KDE apps&
I'm running sid.
When I use window managers like icewm, fvwm etc., the x-resources i have
in ~/.Xresources are loaded properly on Xserver startup. The resources
in /etc/X11/app-defaults don't seem to be loaded.
When I install the kde-packages, the opposite is the case: my
~/.Xresource
> I just did a dselect update/install on my machine, which is running potato
> plus several extra apt sources. Here is my sources.list; note especially
> the XFree86 4.02 packages and the 2.4 kernel support packages:
>
[...]
> dpkg: /home/wichert/debian/dpkg-1.6.15/main/packages.c:191: process_
http://people.debian.org/~bunk/debian potato main
deb http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/ xf402_potato/i386/
deb http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/ xf402_potato/all/
deb http://www.winehq.com/~ovek/ stable/
Updated KDE packages were downloaded and unpacked. However, the configure
step failed with the
On Tuesday 27 February 2001 17:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 30 megs is not a pretty thought since I am lucky to connect at 28.8
> here in bad-copper-wire-country, rural Central Florida.
I can certainly sympathize. I'm in rural Oklahoma, with about six
miles of copper between my modem and th
?
I live in Titusville, FL (on the east coast) and Central Florida had Road
Runner access before we did!
If you don't have broadband, you're hatin' life.
Robert
> 30 megs is not a pretty thought since I am lucky to connect at 28.8 here
> in bad-copper-wire-country,
> rural Central Florida.
Title: Re: New KDE Packages
> > > I'm trying to update my kde (to 2.1) for my potato, but it seems
that
> > > most packages cannot be installed.
> > >
> > > apt-get update
> > > apt-get upgrade
> > > give me:
> > >
> > &
> > > > I'm trying to update my kde (to 2.1) for my potato, but it seems that
> > > > most packages cannot be installed.
> > > >
> > > > apt-get update
> > > > apt-get upgrade
> > > > give me:
> > > >
> > > > The following packages have been kept back
for this, someone needs to use dselect to find
er kview libkonq3 libminimagick5
> > > libqt2.2 secpolicy 8 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to
> > > remove and 36 not upgraded. Need to get 3840kB of archives. After
> > > unpacking 65.5kB will be us
ck5
> > libqt2.2 secpolicy 8 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to
> > remove and 36 not upgraded. Need to get 3840kB of archives. After
> > unpacking 65.5kB will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
>
> I got the same thing, so I tried apt-get dist-upgrade.
s of stuff, starting with abbrowser and going right down
the alphabetical list of kde packages.
--
Bud Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.sirinet.net/~budr
All things in moderation. And not too much moderation either.
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:56:15 +0100."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Try apt-get dist-upgrade. That should get most if not all of
those packages installed. At least, it did for me.
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to update my kd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to update my kde (to 2.1) for my potato, but it seems that most
> packages cannot be installed.
They are not installed, rather than "they cannot".
> The following packages have been kept back
Exactly.
> Any idea ?
apt-get install
--
Alessio F. Bragadin
Hello all,
I'm trying to update my kde (to 2.1) for my potato, but it seems that most
packages cannot be installed.
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
give me:
The following packages have been kept back
abbrowser ark kab karm kcalc kcharselect kcron kdebase kdebase-libs kdelibs3
kdepasswd kdm k
100 matches
Mail list logo
