[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:39:46AM -, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:02:59AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > >> I am currently following the testing distribution and getting KDE
> > >> from kde.tdyc.com.
> > it is NOT becuase of it being updated so often. The problem has
> > been that it is not built for the alpha due to problems with that
> > port. Once that is solved it will go into testing.
>
> Ok, excuse my ignorance here, but is it "close" to being
> solved or is development on
On Feb 19 2001, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> it is NOT becuase of it being updated so often. The problem has
> been that it is not built for the alpha due to problems with that
> port. Once that is solved it will go into testing.
Ok, excuse my ignorance here, but is it "close" to being
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:39:46AM -, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:02:59AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> I am currently following the testing distribution and getting KDE from
> >> kde.tdyc.com. I was just curious as to why KDE is not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:02:59AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I am currently following the testing distribution and getting KDE from
>> kde.tdyc.com. I was just curious as to why KDE is not in the testing
>> distribution when it has been in unstable for so long
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:02:59AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am currently following the testing distribution and getting KDE from
> kde.tdyc.com. I was just curious as to why KDE is not in the testing
> distribution when it has been in unstable for so long.
because it doesn't meet the re
I am currently following the testing distribution and getting KDE from
kde.tdyc.com. I was just curious as to why KDE is not in the testing
distribution when it has been in unstable for so long.
Regards,
John Travers
7 matches
Mail list logo